Inequality and Frailty in Older Adults: a Comparison Among Four European Countries with Different Ageing Context

IF 1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Ageing International Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s12126-022-09493-7
Sara Zella, Simone Sarti, Daniele Zaccaria
{"title":"Inequality and Frailty in Older Adults: a Comparison Among Four European Countries with Different Ageing Context","authors":"Sara Zella,&nbsp;Simone Sarti,&nbsp;Daniele Zaccaria","doi":"10.1007/s12126-022-09493-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the association between work trajectories and frailty in later life in four ageing contexts (AAI index): Czech Republic, Denmark, Italy and Poland.</p><p>Data of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) is used to create the frailty index and linear regression models are applied to assess the association between frailty condition and work trajectories of 6187 women and men, aged between 50 and 74 years old.</p><p>The findings underline that women experience worse frailty than men in all countries. Having precarious work trajectories is detrimental to individuals’ health everywhere, but it becomes even worse for Danish men and Polish men and women. The ageing context (AAI index) is not associated with health inequalities in older people.</p><p>We suggest that further research should explore more in detail the mechanisms linking job insecurity to psycho-social risks as possible determinants of frailty, taking into account differences at the national level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-022-09493-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper investigates the association between work trajectories and frailty in later life in four ageing contexts (AAI index): Czech Republic, Denmark, Italy and Poland.

Data of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) is used to create the frailty index and linear regression models are applied to assess the association between frailty condition and work trajectories of 6187 women and men, aged between 50 and 74 years old.

The findings underline that women experience worse frailty than men in all countries. Having precarious work trajectories is detrimental to individuals’ health everywhere, but it becomes even worse for Danish men and Polish men and women. The ageing context (AAI index) is not associated with health inequalities in older people.

We suggest that further research should explore more in detail the mechanisms linking job insecurity to psycho-social risks as possible determinants of frailty, taking into account differences at the national level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人的不平等和虚弱:四个欧洲国家不同老龄化背景的比较
本文研究了捷克共和国、丹麦、意大利和波兰四个老龄化背景(AAI指数)中工作轨迹与晚年虚弱之间的关系。利用欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的数据编制脆弱性指数,并应用线性回归模型评估6187名50至74岁男女的脆弱性状况与工作轨迹之间的关系。研究结果强调,在所有国家,女性都比男性更脆弱。不稳定的工作轨迹对任何地方的个人健康都是有害的,但对丹麦男性和波兰男性和女性来说,情况更糟。老龄化背景(AAI指数)与老年人的健康不平等无关。我们建议,考虑到国家层面的差异,进一步的研究应该更详细地探索将工作不安全感与心理社会风险联系起来的机制,作为脆弱的可能决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Price- and Services-Related Preferences for Nursing Homes in Japan Using a Nested Logit Model in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Identification of Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of a New Pain Assessment Mobile Health Application by Family Carers of People with Dementia: A Qualitative Study Factors Affecting Hypertension among Middle and Old Aged People in Northern Region of India: A Cross-Sectional Study Using LASI Wave-1 Data Influence of Individual and Contextual Variables on Negative Stereotypes of Ageing in a Spanish Sample Incidental Physical Activity and Physical Fitness Associate with Sustained Attention and Impulse Control in Older Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1