Deviant Motherhood

IF 1.2 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Social Text Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1215/01642472-7971103
Leyla Savloff
{"title":"Deviant Motherhood","authors":"Leyla Savloff","doi":"10.1215/01642472-7971103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses two intertwined forms of care that engage with incarcerated women in Argentina. First, it examines the consequences of a policy change that allows incarcerated women who are pregnant and/or caregivers of small children to serve their time at home. Institutional confinement extends beyond the prison and has taken various forms, such as the shelter, the asylum, relocation centers, and prison camps. Inspired by recent prison studies that disrupt the prison as a fixed and hardened site, this article contends that house arrest is far from a benefit. Rather, home confinement constitutes a site of neglect where women must fend for themselves to perform reproductive labor as a way to complete their sentence. This practice reveals new forms of social control and state surveillance in which judges, social workers, and penitentiaries determine which women are appropriate for house arrest while policing the terms of their confinement. Second, this article presents the author’s fieldwork involving a women’s collective that offers art-related workshops to encourage incarcerated women to develop a different understanding of their agency and potential. Institutions such as neighborhood and women’s collectives offer new forms of sociality that redefine imprisonment. As women under house arrest are expected to provide for themselves and their children, it is important to understand how they meet such challenges, considering how gender norms and institutional violence impact women’s lives today.","PeriodicalId":47701,"journal":{"name":"Social Text","volume":"38 1","pages":"67-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Text","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7971103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses two intertwined forms of care that engage with incarcerated women in Argentina. First, it examines the consequences of a policy change that allows incarcerated women who are pregnant and/or caregivers of small children to serve their time at home. Institutional confinement extends beyond the prison and has taken various forms, such as the shelter, the asylum, relocation centers, and prison camps. Inspired by recent prison studies that disrupt the prison as a fixed and hardened site, this article contends that house arrest is far from a benefit. Rather, home confinement constitutes a site of neglect where women must fend for themselves to perform reproductive labor as a way to complete their sentence. This practice reveals new forms of social control and state surveillance in which judges, social workers, and penitentiaries determine which women are appropriate for house arrest while policing the terms of their confinement. Second, this article presents the author’s fieldwork involving a women’s collective that offers art-related workshops to encourage incarcerated women to develop a different understanding of their agency and potential. Institutions such as neighborhood and women’s collectives offer new forms of sociality that redefine imprisonment. As women under house arrest are expected to provide for themselves and their children, it is important to understand how they meet such challenges, considering how gender norms and institutional violence impact women’s lives today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不正常的母亲
本文讨论了阿根廷监禁女性所面临的两种相互交织的护理形式。首先,它审查了一项政策变化的后果,该政策允许怀孕和/或照顾小孩的被监禁妇女在家服刑。机构禁闭超出了监狱的范围,采取了各种形式,如收容所、收容所、安置中心和战俘营。受最近监狱研究的启发,这篇文章认为,将监狱作为一个固定的、坚固的场所,而不是一个好处。相反,在家坐月子是一种被忽视的场所,妇女必须自己照顾自己,进行生育劳动,作为完成刑期的一种方式。这种做法揭示了社会控制和国家监督的新形式,法官、社会工作者和监狱决定哪些妇女适合软禁,同时监督她们的监禁条件。其次,本文介绍了作者的实地工作,涉及一个妇女集体,该集体提供与艺术有关的讲习班,以鼓励被监禁的妇女对她们的代理和潜力有不同的理解。社区和妇女集体等机构提供了新的社会形式,重新定义了监禁。由于被软禁的妇女要为自己和子女提供生活所需,考虑到性别规范和机构暴力如何影响当今妇女的生活,了解她们如何应对这些挑战是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Text
Social Text CULTURAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Photo of Palestinian refugees in Hebron, 1950 Border Abolitionism Objective Vision Playing and Hiding Joyfully in the Rubble To See in the Dark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1