Archives in Portuguese public policies: a steady place

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Records Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1108/rmj-06-2022-0014
Carlos Guardado da Silva, L. Corujo, Maria Miguel Duque Perdigão
{"title":"Archives in Portuguese public policies: a steady place","authors":"Carlos Guardado da Silva, L. Corujo, Maria Miguel Duque Perdigão","doi":"10.1108/rmj-06-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to examine the archives’ role in Portuguese public policies from 1976 to 2021, based on an analysis of decision-making and support mechanisms, as well as other legal and normative instruments (diplomas) associated with relevant policies and legal actions in government programs, major planning options, sectoral programs and legislation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe investigation was based on a qualitative methodological framework that follows the document analysis method, consisting of four phases: research; first reading; critical reading and data collection; and analysis and interpretation.\n\n\nFindings\nSurvey results identified the presence of the archives on government agendas and supported tracing an evolution in the development and application of measures in this area. Additionally, it was possible to relate these measures to socioeconomic and political contexts and to previously identified reference studies. The conclusion is that the place of archives in Portuguese public policies between 1976 and 2021 was still based in historical and heritage dimensions, excluding the aspect of information management, which was not even included within the concept of archives.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is an original case study of the state of Portuguese archive policies, compared against reference works such as Couture(1998) and more recent national developments as considered in the works of Silva(2019).","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-06-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the archives’ role in Portuguese public policies from 1976 to 2021, based on an analysis of decision-making and support mechanisms, as well as other legal and normative instruments (diplomas) associated with relevant policies and legal actions in government programs, major planning options, sectoral programs and legislation. Design/methodology/approach The investigation was based on a qualitative methodological framework that follows the document analysis method, consisting of four phases: research; first reading; critical reading and data collection; and analysis and interpretation. Findings Survey results identified the presence of the archives on government agendas and supported tracing an evolution in the development and application of measures in this area. Additionally, it was possible to relate these measures to socioeconomic and political contexts and to previously identified reference studies. The conclusion is that the place of archives in Portuguese public policies between 1976 and 2021 was still based in historical and heritage dimensions, excluding the aspect of information management, which was not even included within the concept of archives. Originality/value This is an original case study of the state of Portuguese archive policies, compared against reference works such as Couture(1998) and more recent national developments as considered in the works of Silva(2019).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙公共政策档案:一个稳定的地方
本研究旨在通过对决策和支持机制的分析,以及与政府计划、主要规划方案、部门计划和立法中的相关政策和法律行动相关的其他法律和规范性文书(文凭),研究1976年至2021年葡萄牙公共政策中档案馆的作用。设计/方法学/方法本调查采用定性方法学框架,遵循文献分析法,包括四个阶段:研究;首先阅读;批判性阅读和数据收集;分析和解释。调查结果调查结果确定了档案在政府议程上的存在,并支持追踪这方面措施的发展和应用的演变。此外,还可以将这些措施与社会经济和政治背景以及先前确定的参考研究联系起来。结论是,1976年至2021年间,档案在葡萄牙公共政策中的地位仍然基于历史和遗产维度,而不包括信息管理方面,这甚至不包括在档案的概念中。原创性/价值这是对葡萄牙档案政策状况的原始案例研究,与参考作品如Couture(1998)和Silva(2019)中考虑的近期国家发展进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Records Management Journal
Records Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: ■Electronic records management ■Effect of government policies on record management ■Strategic developments in both the public and private sectors ■Systems design and implementation ■Models for records management ■Best practice, standards and guidelines ■Risk management and business continuity ■Performance measurement ■Continuing professional development ■Consortia and co-operation ■Marketing ■Preservation ■Legal and ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Records management compliance: a case study of Kuwait’s College of Basic Education Strategy for auditing investigation records and information: a case study of records and information management in the Royal Malaysian Police Electronic records management amidst the seismic shift in the dynamic infosphere Insights into the current state of electronic health records adoption and utilisation in Tanzanian public primary healthcare facilities: a survey study Conceptual framework to explore artificial intelligence technology (AIT) readiness and adoption intention in records and information management (RIM) practices: a proposal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1