首页 > 最新文献

Records Management Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Records management compliance: a case study of Kuwait’s College of Basic Education 记录管理合规性:科威特基础教育学院案例研究
IF 1.4 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-09-2023-0050
Sakena A. Al-Alawi

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the compliance of Kuwait’s College of Basic Education (CBE) with records management standards (RMS), legislation and regulations.

Design/methodology/approach

This case study collects data from semi-structured interviews and a thorough internet search of relevant records management (RM) policies and procedures.

Findings

The findings reveal the shortcomings of the bottom-up approach to RM, which poses significant risks due to inadequate management and monitoring; lack of compliance with local or national records and archives regulations; and a general unawareness of RMS and best practices among interviewees.

Research limitations/implications

This study focuses on CBE, potentially limiting generalizability to other academic institutions in Kuwait, but offers valuable insights for polities that similarly lack records legislation and wish to improve their RM practices and comply with international standards.

Practical implications

This study proposes a more top-down approach to RM with the adoption of international RMS to improve practices, minimize risks and reduce legal liabilities. Positive outcomes will support the case for records and archives legislation (RAL) in Kuwait and provide the framework for its establishment.

Social implications

The study argues that the passage of RAL and the subsequent implementation of RMS will improve citizens’ Right to Access Information.

Originality/value

This study initiates a pioneering effort in understanding Public Authority for Applied Education and Training and CBE’s level of compliance with RMS, legislation and regulations and their challenges.

目的本研究旨在调查科威特基础教育学院(CBE)遵守记录管理标准(RMS)、法律和法 规的情况。研究结果研究结果揭示了自下而上的记录管理方法的不足之处,由于管理和监督不力、不遵守地方或国家记录和档案法规以及受访者普遍不了解记录管理系统和最佳实践,这种方法带来了巨大风险。研究的局限性/启示本研究以 CBE 为重点,可能限制了对科威特其他学术机构的推广,但为同样缺 乏记录立法、希望改进其记录管理实践并遵守国际标准的国家提供了宝贵的启示。研究认为,《记录和档案法》的通过以及随后《记录和档案管理制度》的实施将改善公 民获取信息的权利。原创性/价值这项研究开创性地了解了应用教育和培训公共机构以及中央广播电视机 构遵守《记录和档案管理制度》、法律法规的程度及其面临的挑战。
{"title":"Records management compliance: a case study of Kuwait’s College of Basic Education","authors":"Sakena A. Al-Alawi","doi":"10.1108/rmj-09-2023-0050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-09-2023-0050","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This study aims to investigate the compliance of Kuwait’s College of Basic Education (CBE) with records management standards (RMS), legislation and regulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This case study collects data from semi-structured interviews and a thorough internet search of relevant records management (RM) policies and procedures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The findings reveal the shortcomings of the bottom-up approach to RM, which poses significant risks due to inadequate management and monitoring; lack of compliance with local or national records and archives regulations; and a general unawareness of RMS and best practices among interviewees.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\u0000<p>This study focuses on CBE, potentially limiting generalizability to other academic institutions in Kuwait, but offers valuable insights for polities that similarly lack records legislation and wish to improve their RM practices and comply with international standards.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Practical implications</h3>\u0000<p>This study proposes a more top-down approach to RM with the adoption of international RMS to improve practices, minimize risks and reduce legal liabilities. Positive outcomes will support the case for records and archives legislation (RAL) in Kuwait and provide the framework for its establishment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Social implications</h3>\u0000<p>The study argues that the passage of RAL and the subsequent implementation of RMS will improve citizens’ Right to Access Information.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This study initiates a pioneering effort in understanding Public Authority for Applied Education and Training and CBE’s level of compliance with RMS, legislation and regulations and their challenges.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142214380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategy for auditing investigation records and information: a case study of records and information management in the Royal Malaysian Police 审计调查记录和信息的战略:马来西亚皇家警察记录和信息管理案例研究
IF 1.4 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-11-2023-0068
Widura Abd Kadir, Umi Asma’ Mokhtar, Zawiyah M. Yusof

Purpose

This study aims to conduct an analysis of the strategy used by Royal Malaysian Police in auditing investigation records and information.

Design/methodology/approach

Qualitative methodologies were used based on the pragmatic philosophy and a case study approach.

Findings

This paper discusses the strategy for auditing the investigation records and information (AIRI), which includes the pre-auditing (input), auditing (process) and post-auditing (output) phases that will be used to develop the AIRI framework.

Research limitations/implications

This study focuses on auditing investigative records and information that may not be universally applicable to all organisations.

Practical implications

The implications arising from this paper are those related to the need to understand, promote and implement auditing of records and information in organisations.

Originality/value

This study presents an opportunity and establishes the foundation for enhancing and broadening the scope of information auditing, a crucial component within the records and information management (RIM) life cycle.

研究结果本文讨论了调查记录和信息(AIRI)的审计策略,包括审计前(输入)、审计(过程)和审计后(输出)阶段,这些阶段将用于制定 AIRI 框架。研究局限性/影响本研究侧重于调查记录和信息的审计,可能无法普遍适用于所有组织。原创性/价值本研究为加强和扩大信息审计的范围提供了机会并奠定了基础,信息审计是记录和信息管理(RIM)生命周期中的一个重要组成部分。
{"title":"Strategy for auditing investigation records and information: a case study of records and information management in the Royal Malaysian Police","authors":"Widura Abd Kadir, Umi Asma’ Mokhtar, Zawiyah M. Yusof","doi":"10.1108/rmj-11-2023-0068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-11-2023-0068","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This study aims to conduct an analysis of the strategy used by Royal Malaysian Police in auditing investigation records and information.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>Qualitative methodologies were used based on the pragmatic philosophy and a case study approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>This paper discusses the strategy for auditing the investigation records and information (AIRI), which includes the pre-auditing (input), auditing (process) and post-auditing (output) phases that will be used to develop the AIRI framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\u0000<p>This study focuses on auditing investigative records and information that may not be universally applicable to all organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Practical implications</h3>\u0000<p>The implications arising from this paper are those related to the need to understand, promote and implement auditing of records and information in organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This study presents an opportunity and establishes the foundation for enhancing and broadening the scope of information auditing, a crucial component within the records and information management (RIM) life cycle.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142214381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electronic records management amidst the seismic shift in the dynamic infosphere 电子档案管理在动态信息圈的地震转变中的作用
IF 1.4 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-04-2023-0022
Mpubane Emanuel Matlala, Thandukwazi Richman Ncube

Purpose

The study aims to investigate the current electronic records management practices in government departments of South Africa to establish the extent to which they foster service delivery in public service reform programmes.

Design/methodology/approach

This study applied a systematic literature review approach to critically appraise the published literature on the status of records management in South Africa, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Findings

The findings indicate that the South African public sector encounters challenges such as a lack of skills in managing electronic records, management support, resources and legislative frameworks and policies. The study’s findings revealed that although electronic records are essential for service delivery in South Africa, the existing records management programme is not efficient and effective and does not sufficiently comply with legislative and statutory requirements.

Research limitations/implications

This study was limited to the public sector of South Africa.

Practical implications

This study recommends the development of policy frameworks and strategies aligned with the organisational goals and facilitation of professional training for all staff, including attendance of seminars, workshops and workplace training.

Social implications

The research demonstrates the need for a comprehensive legislative and policy framework, robust integration of electronic records practices in government e-government efforts, and adequate technological infrastructure support.

Originality/value

This study offers informed recommendations to address the challenges of managing electronic records in South African public sector organisations that continue to be a cause for concern.

研究目的本研究旨在调查南非政府部门当前的电子记录管理实践,以确定它们在多大程度上促进了公共服务改革计划中的服务交付。研究结果研究结果表明,南非公共部门面临着各种挑战,如缺乏管理电子记录的技能、管理支持、资源以及立法框架和政策。研究限制/影响本研究仅限于南非的公共部门。实际意义本研究建议制定与组织目标相一致的政策框架和战略,并促进对所有员工的专业培训,包括参加研讨会、讲习班和工作场所培训。社会影响本研究表明,有必要建立一个全面的立法和政策框架,将电子记录实践有力地融入到政 府的电子政务工作中,并提供充足的技术基础设施支持。
{"title":"Electronic records management amidst the seismic shift in the dynamic infosphere","authors":"Mpubane Emanuel Matlala, Thandukwazi Richman Ncube","doi":"10.1108/rmj-04-2023-0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-04-2023-0022","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>The study aims to investigate the current electronic records management practices in government departments of South Africa to establish the extent to which they foster service delivery in public service reform programmes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This study applied a systematic literature review approach to critically appraise the published literature on the status of records management in South Africa, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The findings indicate that the South African public sector encounters challenges such as a lack of skills in managing electronic records, management support, resources and legislative frameworks and policies. The study’s findings revealed that although electronic records are essential for service delivery in South Africa, the existing records management programme is not efficient and effective and does not sufficiently comply with legislative and statutory requirements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\u0000<p>This study was limited to the public sector of South Africa.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Practical implications</h3>\u0000<p>This study recommends the development of policy frameworks and strategies aligned with the organisational goals and facilitation of professional training for all staff, including attendance of seminars, workshops and workplace training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Social implications</h3>\u0000<p>The research demonstrates the need for a comprehensive legislative and policy framework, robust integration of electronic records practices in government e-government efforts, and adequate technological infrastructure support.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This study offers informed recommendations to address the challenges of managing electronic records in South African public sector organisations that continue to be a cause for concern.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142214384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Insights into the current state of electronic health records adoption and utilisation in Tanzanian public primary healthcare facilities: a survey study 坦桑尼亚公立基层医疗机构采用和使用电子病历的现状透视:一项调查研究
IF 1.4 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-04-2023-0023
Augustino Mwogosi, Cesilia Mambile

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the adoption and use of electronic health record systems (EHRS) in Tanzanian public primary healthcare institutions. The study’s objectives include understanding the factors that affect EHRS adoption, identifying implementation challenges and evaluating the effect of EHRS usage on healthcare delivery. By addressing these research goals, the study aims to contribute insightful information on the current level of EHRS adoption in Tanzanian primary healthcare facilities and contribute to developing strategies to improve EHRS deployment and healthcare in the nation.

Design/methodology/approach

This study combined quantitative and qualitative data using a mixed-methods methodology. Both data types were collected and analysed concurrently using a concurrent triangulation approach. The study aimed to comprehend the variables that affect the adoption and use of EHRS in Tanzanian public primary healthcare institutions. Eleven regions spanning various geographic locations and urban–rural dynamics were chosen as research sites. A survey of 122 healthcare employees was conducted with a sample of 31 healthcare facilities. The questionnaire had closed-ended and open-ended questions to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used in data analysis. Throughout the investigation, ethical standards and confidentiality precautions were observed.

Findings

Several factors affect the adoption and use of EHRS. Perceived usefulness and use, support and training, interoperability, data security and privacy, business culture and leadership are all factors. Inadequate infrastructure, power interruptions, duplication of effort and a lack of data analytic expertise were among the difficulties. Among the effects were improvements in data management, service delivery and coordination, productivity and efficiency, medical supply inventory control, billing and revenue collection.

Originality/value

This study, which complements earlier research that has concentrated chiefly on specialised healthcare settings, gives new insights by investigating the adoption and utilisation of EHRS, especially in primary healthcare institutions. The findings give policymakers and healthcare professionals in Tanzania and other nations vital information to help them decide whether to embrace and use EHRS in primary healthcare.

目的 本研究旨在调查坦桑尼亚公立初级医疗机构采用和使用电子健康记录系统(EHRS)的情况。研究目标包括了解影响采用电子病历系统的因素、确定实施挑战以及评估使用电子病历系统对医疗服务的影响。通过实现这些研究目标,本研究旨在就坦桑尼亚初级医疗机构目前采用电子病历系统的水平提供有见地的信息,并为制定改善电子病历系统部署和国家医疗保健的策略做出贡献。两类数据均采用并行三角测量法同时收集和分析。研究旨在了解影响坦桑尼亚公立初级医疗机构采用和使用电子病历系统的变量。研究选取了 11 个跨越不同地理位置和城乡动态的地区作为研究地点。对 31 家医疗机构的 122 名医护人员进行了抽样调查。调查问卷包括封闭式问题和开放式问题,以收集定量和定性数据。数据分析采用了描述性统计和主题分析。在整个调查过程中,遵守了道德标准和保密预防措施。认为有用和使用、支持和培训、互操作性、数据安全和隐私、企业文化和领导力都是影响因素。基础设施不足、电力中断、工作重复和缺乏数据分析专业知识也是困难之一。这项研究是对先前主要集中于专业医疗机构的研究的补充,通过调查电子病历系统的采用和使用情况,尤其是在基层医疗机构的采用和使用情况,提出了新的见解。研究结果为坦桑尼亚和其他国家的政策制定者和医疗保健专业人员提供了重要信息,帮助他们决定是否在初级医疗保健中接受和使用电子病历系统。
{"title":"Insights into the current state of electronic health records adoption and utilisation in Tanzanian public primary healthcare facilities: a survey study","authors":"Augustino Mwogosi, Cesilia Mambile","doi":"10.1108/rmj-04-2023-0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-04-2023-0023","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This study aims to investigate the adoption and use of electronic health record systems (EHRS) in Tanzanian public primary healthcare institutions. The study’s objectives include understanding the factors that affect EHRS adoption, identifying implementation challenges and evaluating the effect of EHRS usage on healthcare delivery. By addressing these research goals, the study aims to contribute insightful information on the current level of EHRS adoption in Tanzanian primary healthcare facilities and contribute to developing strategies to improve EHRS deployment and healthcare in the nation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This study combined quantitative and qualitative data using a mixed-methods methodology. Both data types were collected and analysed concurrently using a concurrent triangulation approach. The study aimed to comprehend the variables that affect the adoption and use of EHRS in Tanzanian public primary healthcare institutions. Eleven regions spanning various geographic locations and urban–rural dynamics were chosen as research sites. A survey of 122 healthcare employees was conducted with a sample of 31 healthcare facilities. The questionnaire had closed-ended and open-ended questions to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used in data analysis. Throughout the investigation, ethical standards and confidentiality precautions were observed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>Several factors affect the adoption and use of EHRS. Perceived usefulness and use, support and training, interoperability, data security and privacy, business culture and leadership are all factors. Inadequate infrastructure, power interruptions, duplication of effort and a lack of data analytic expertise were among the difficulties. Among the effects were improvements in data management, service delivery and coordination, productivity and efficiency, medical supply inventory control, billing and revenue collection.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>This study, which complements earlier research that has concentrated chiefly on specialised healthcare settings, gives new insights by investigating the adoption and utilisation of EHRS, especially in primary healthcare institutions. The findings give policymakers and healthcare professionals in Tanzania and other nations vital information to help them decide whether to embrace and use EHRS in primary healthcare.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142214382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Searching for a smoking gun: access to information and release of the John F. Kennedy assassination records 寻找冒烟的枪支:获取信息和公布约翰-肯尼迪遇刺记录
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-12-2023-0082
Amy Howard
PurposeThe records surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) have been subject to unique treatment in their management and opening. The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Records Act) mandated that the records would be opened in full by 2017, unless there was intervention from the sitting president. This study aims to examine the extent to which access to the JFK assassination records has been granted. It evaluates how open the archive is, and the consequences of withholding government records. It examines how the continued non-disclosure of this archive has helped to fuel the controversy and conspiracy theories surrounding Kennedy’s death.Design/methodology/approachThis research was approached as traditional historical document analysis, reviewing the JFK assassination records releases from 2017–2018 and the broader landscape of access to information in America. A random sampling of the open and redacted records was used to undertake a statistical analysis on the amount of information that has been withheld. It was supplemented with freedom of information requests intended to reveal further information on the approach taken to redaction. The work was situated within a broader global literature review.FindingsThe research identified the limits to access to the JFK assassination records that exist because of the continued postponement and redaction of information by US federal government agencies. It found that the ambiguous language used for exemptions in the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the JFK Records Act has allowed agencies the freedom to interpret and limit access to information if they desired. Furthermore, agencies have had the power to hold and sanitise their own records. The work identifies how these approaches have caused questions, inconsistences, a lack of transparency and accountability in the US government. The lack of centralised processes and related explanations can be seen to fuel further controversies and conspiracies.Originality/valueUsing a systematic research methodology, this work presents a careful analysis of the varying processes and their implications for understanding of the events that surrounded Kennedy’s assassination. Lessons learnt can be applied to the general management of freedom of information and access to information.
目的与约翰-肯尼迪总统(JFK)遇刺有关的记录在管理和开放方面一直受到特殊对待。1992 年《约翰-肯尼迪遇刺记录收集法》(《肯尼迪记录法》)规定,除非现任总统干预,否则这些记录将在 2017 年之前全部开放。本研究旨在探讨肯尼迪遇刺档案的开放程度。它评估了档案的开放程度,以及隐瞒政府记录的后果。本研究采用传统的历史文献分析方法,回顾了 2017-2018 年肯尼迪遇刺记录的发布情况以及美国信息获取的更广泛情况。对公开和编辑过的记录进行随机抽样,对被隐瞒的信息量进行统计分析。此外,还提出了信息自由申请,以揭示有关编辑方法的更多信息。研究发现,由于美国联邦政府机构不断推迟和编辑信息,对肯尼迪暗杀档案的获取造成了限制。研究发现,美国《信息自由法》(FOIA)和《肯尼迪档案法》在豁免方面使用了模棱两可的措辞,这使得各机构可以随意解释和限制对信息的获取。此外,各机构还有权保存和消毒自己的记录。这项工作指出了这些方法是如何在美国政府中造成问题、不一致、缺乏透明度和问责制的。原创性/价值通过系统的研究方法,这部作品对围绕肯尼迪遇刺事件的不同过程及其对理解肯尼迪遇刺事件的影响进行了细致的分析。从中汲取的经验教训可用于信息自由和信息获取的一般管理。
{"title":"Searching for a smoking gun: access to information and release of the John F. Kennedy assassination records","authors":"Amy Howard","doi":"10.1108/rmj-12-2023-0082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-12-2023-0082","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The records surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) have been subject to unique treatment in their management and opening. The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Records Act) mandated that the records would be opened in full by 2017, unless there was intervention from the sitting president. This study aims to examine the extent to which access to the JFK assassination records has been granted. It evaluates how open the archive is, and the consequences of withholding government records. It examines how the continued non-disclosure of this archive has helped to fuel the controversy and conspiracy theories surrounding Kennedy’s death.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This research was approached as traditional historical document analysis, reviewing the JFK assassination records releases from 2017–2018 and the broader landscape of access to information in America. A random sampling of the open and redacted records was used to undertake a statistical analysis on the amount of information that has been withheld. It was supplemented with freedom of information requests intended to reveal further information on the approach taken to redaction. The work was situated within a broader global literature review.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The research identified the limits to access to the JFK assassination records that exist because of the continued postponement and redaction of information by US federal government agencies. It found that the ambiguous language used for exemptions in the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the JFK Records Act has allowed agencies the freedom to interpret and limit access to information if they desired. Furthermore, agencies have had the power to hold and sanitise their own records. The work identifies how these approaches have caused questions, inconsistences, a lack of transparency and accountability in the US government. The lack of centralised processes and related explanations can be seen to fuel further controversies and conspiracies.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Using a systematic research methodology, this work presents a careful analysis of the varying processes and their implications for understanding of the events that surrounded Kennedy’s assassination. Lessons learnt can be applied to the general management of freedom of information and access to information.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141919219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of records management systems in Tanzania public sector organisations 坦桑尼亚公共部门机构使用档案管理系统的情况
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-12-2021-0041
Josephine Manase, Kelefa Mwantimwa, Tumpe Ndimbwa
PurposePaper-based records management systems remain dominant in Tanzanian Government organisations despite the increase in digital records management systems adoption across the globe. To create an understanding of this state, this study aims to investigate the use of records management systems in Tanzanian public sector organisations.Design/methodology/approachA descriptive research design was used in this study, alongside quantitative and qualitative approaches. A total of 81 respondents were drawn from three public sector organisations. To get a sample, non-probability (convenience and purposive) sampling techniques were used. A cross-sectional survey questionnaire and interview methods were used to gather quantitative and qualitative data. To analyse quantitative and qualitative data, the researchers used a mixed-methods analysis.FindingsThe study reveals different types of records management systems used in public sector organisations. Besides, the findings suggest that a large proportion of records are created through the digitisation of existing records. Aside from that, the study has revealed different types of records managed in the systems by government organisations. According to the study, there are various factors that determine the effective use of records management systems in public sector organisations.Research limitations/implicationsThe implications of the present study are diverse. Specifically, its findings expand the theoretical body of knowledge by adding new insights regarding records management systems usage in government offices. The findings also provide the government with a basis for formulating and improving legal and regulatory frameworks to enhance records management. Apart from this, the findings are likely to benefit records practitioners by orchestrating inclusive strategies that will promote, not only effectiveness, but also sustainability in records management.Originality/valueIn Tanzania, a few studies have been conducted to examine digital records management practices and systems. These studies have not extensively highlighted the systems used to manage the records. This makes little to be known on the systems used to manage records in government offices. The present study has ascertained records management systems used in public sector organisations.
目的 尽管全球范围内采用数字记录管理系统的机构越来越多,但在坦桑尼亚政府机构中,纸质记录管理系统仍占主导地位。为了了解这种状况,本研究旨在调查坦桑尼亚公共部门组织中记录管理系统的使用情况。 设计/方法/途径 本研究采用了描述性研究设计,同时还使用了定量和定性方法。共有 81 名受访者来自三个公共部门组织。为了获得样本,采用了非概率(方便和有目的)抽样技术。采用横向调查问卷和访谈方法收集定量和定性数据。为了分析定量和定性数据,研究人员使用了混合方法分析。此外,研究结果表明,很大一部分记录是通过现有记录的数字化创建的。除此之外,研究还揭示了政府机构在系统中管理的不同类型的记录。研究限制/影响本研究的影响是多方面的。具体来说,研究结果扩展了理论知识体系,为政府部门使用档案管理系统提供了新的见解。研究结果还为政府制定和改进法律法规框架以加强档案管理提供了依据。除此以外,研究结果还可能使档案从业人员受益,因为他们可以制定包容性战略,不仅能提高档案管理的有效性,还能促进档案管理的可持续性。这些研究并未广泛强调用于管理记录的系统。因此,人们对政府部门使用的档案管理系统知之甚少。本研究确定了公共部门组织使用的记录管理系统。
{"title":"Use of records management systems in Tanzania public sector organisations","authors":"Josephine Manase, Kelefa Mwantimwa, Tumpe Ndimbwa","doi":"10.1108/rmj-12-2021-0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-12-2021-0041","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Paper-based records management systems remain dominant in Tanzanian Government organisations despite the increase in digital records management systems adoption across the globe. To create an understanding of this state, this study aims to investigate the use of records management systems in Tanzanian public sector organisations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A descriptive research design was used in this study, alongside quantitative and qualitative approaches. A total of 81 respondents were drawn from three public sector organisations. To get a sample, non-probability (convenience and purposive) sampling techniques were used. A cross-sectional survey questionnaire and interview methods were used to gather quantitative and qualitative data. To analyse quantitative and qualitative data, the researchers used a mixed-methods analysis.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The study reveals different types of records management systems used in public sector organisations. Besides, the findings suggest that a large proportion of records are created through the digitisation of existing records. Aside from that, the study has revealed different types of records managed in the systems by government organisations. According to the study, there are various factors that determine the effective use of records management systems in public sector organisations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The implications of the present study are diverse. Specifically, its findings expand the theoretical body of knowledge by adding new insights regarding records management systems usage in government offices. The findings also provide the government with a basis for formulating and improving legal and regulatory frameworks to enhance records management. Apart from this, the findings are likely to benefit records practitioners by orchestrating inclusive strategies that will promote, not only effectiveness, but also sustainability in records management.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000In Tanzania, a few studies have been conducted to examine digital records management practices and systems. These studies have not extensively highlighted the systems used to manage the records. This makes little to be known on the systems used to manage records in government offices. The present study has ascertained records management systems used in public sector organisations.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141919160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Searching for a smoking gun: access to information and release of the John F. Kennedy assassination records 寻找冒烟的枪支:获取信息和公布约翰-肯尼迪遇刺记录
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-12-2023-0082
Amy Howard
PurposeThe records surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) have been subject to unique treatment in their management and opening. The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Records Act) mandated that the records would be opened in full by 2017, unless there was intervention from the sitting president. This study aims to examine the extent to which access to the JFK assassination records has been granted. It evaluates how open the archive is, and the consequences of withholding government records. It examines how the continued non-disclosure of this archive has helped to fuel the controversy and conspiracy theories surrounding Kennedy’s death.Design/methodology/approachThis research was approached as traditional historical document analysis, reviewing the JFK assassination records releases from 2017–2018 and the broader landscape of access to information in America. A random sampling of the open and redacted records was used to undertake a statistical analysis on the amount of information that has been withheld. It was supplemented with freedom of information requests intended to reveal further information on the approach taken to redaction. The work was situated within a broader global literature review.FindingsThe research identified the limits to access to the JFK assassination records that exist because of the continued postponement and redaction of information by US federal government agencies. It found that the ambiguous language used for exemptions in the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the JFK Records Act has allowed agencies the freedom to interpret and limit access to information if they desired. Furthermore, agencies have had the power to hold and sanitise their own records. The work identifies how these approaches have caused questions, inconsistences, a lack of transparency and accountability in the US government. The lack of centralised processes and related explanations can be seen to fuel further controversies and conspiracies.Originality/valueUsing a systematic research methodology, this work presents a careful analysis of the varying processes and their implications for understanding of the events that surrounded Kennedy’s assassination. Lessons learnt can be applied to the general management of freedom of information and access to information.
目的与约翰-肯尼迪总统(JFK)遇刺有关的记录在管理和开放方面一直受到特殊对待。1992 年《约翰-肯尼迪遇刺记录收集法》(《肯尼迪记录法》)规定,除非现任总统干预,否则这些记录将在 2017 年之前全部开放。本研究旨在探讨肯尼迪遇刺档案的开放程度。它评估了档案的开放程度,以及隐瞒政府记录的后果。本研究采用传统的历史文献分析方法,回顾了 2017-2018 年肯尼迪遇刺记录的发布情况以及美国信息获取的更广泛情况。对公开和编辑过的记录进行随机抽样,对被隐瞒的信息量进行统计分析。此外,还提出了信息自由申请,以揭示有关编辑方法的更多信息。研究发现,由于美国联邦政府机构不断推迟和编辑信息,对肯尼迪暗杀档案的获取造成了限制。研究发现,美国《信息自由法》(FOIA)和《肯尼迪档案法》在豁免方面使用了模棱两可的措辞,这使得各机构可以随意解释和限制对信息的获取。此外,各机构还有权保存和消毒自己的记录。这项工作指出了这些方法是如何在美国政府中造成问题、不一致、缺乏透明度和问责制的。原创性/价值通过系统的研究方法,这部作品对围绕肯尼迪遇刺事件的不同过程及其对理解肯尼迪遇刺事件的影响进行了细致的分析。从中汲取的经验教训可用于信息自由和信息获取的一般管理。
{"title":"Searching for a smoking gun: access to information and release of the John F. Kennedy assassination records","authors":"Amy Howard","doi":"10.1108/rmj-12-2023-0082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-12-2023-0082","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The records surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) have been subject to unique treatment in their management and opening. The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (JFK Records Act) mandated that the records would be opened in full by 2017, unless there was intervention from the sitting president. This study aims to examine the extent to which access to the JFK assassination records has been granted. It evaluates how open the archive is, and the consequences of withholding government records. It examines how the continued non-disclosure of this archive has helped to fuel the controversy and conspiracy theories surrounding Kennedy’s death.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This research was approached as traditional historical document analysis, reviewing the JFK assassination records releases from 2017–2018 and the broader landscape of access to information in America. A random sampling of the open and redacted records was used to undertake a statistical analysis on the amount of information that has been withheld. It was supplemented with freedom of information requests intended to reveal further information on the approach taken to redaction. The work was situated within a broader global literature review.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The research identified the limits to access to the JFK assassination records that exist because of the continued postponement and redaction of information by US federal government agencies. It found that the ambiguous language used for exemptions in the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the JFK Records Act has allowed agencies the freedom to interpret and limit access to information if they desired. Furthermore, agencies have had the power to hold and sanitise their own records. The work identifies how these approaches have caused questions, inconsistences, a lack of transparency and accountability in the US government. The lack of centralised processes and related explanations can be seen to fuel further controversies and conspiracies.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Using a systematic research methodology, this work presents a careful analysis of the varying processes and their implications for understanding of the events that surrounded Kennedy’s assassination. Lessons learnt can be applied to the general management of freedom of information and access to information.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141919471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of records management systems in Tanzania public sector organisations 坦桑尼亚公共部门机构使用档案管理系统的情况
IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-12-2021-0041
Josephine Manase, Kelefa Mwantimwa, Tumpe Ndimbwa
PurposePaper-based records management systems remain dominant in Tanzanian Government organisations despite the increase in digital records management systems adoption across the globe. To create an understanding of this state, this study aims to investigate the use of records management systems in Tanzanian public sector organisations.Design/methodology/approachA descriptive research design was used in this study, alongside quantitative and qualitative approaches. A total of 81 respondents were drawn from three public sector organisations. To get a sample, non-probability (convenience and purposive) sampling techniques were used. A cross-sectional survey questionnaire and interview methods were used to gather quantitative and qualitative data. To analyse quantitative and qualitative data, the researchers used a mixed-methods analysis.FindingsThe study reveals different types of records management systems used in public sector organisations. Besides, the findings suggest that a large proportion of records are created through the digitisation of existing records. Aside from that, the study has revealed different types of records managed in the systems by government organisations. According to the study, there are various factors that determine the effective use of records management systems in public sector organisations.Research limitations/implicationsThe implications of the present study are diverse. Specifically, its findings expand the theoretical body of knowledge by adding new insights regarding records management systems usage in government offices. The findings also provide the government with a basis for formulating and improving legal and regulatory frameworks to enhance records management. Apart from this, the findings are likely to benefit records practitioners by orchestrating inclusive strategies that will promote, not only effectiveness, but also sustainability in records management.Originality/valueIn Tanzania, a few studies have been conducted to examine digital records management practices and systems. These studies have not extensively highlighted the systems used to manage the records. This makes little to be known on the systems used to manage records in government offices. The present study has ascertained records management systems used in public sector organisations.
目的 尽管全球范围内采用数字记录管理系统的机构越来越多,但在坦桑尼亚政府机构中,纸质记录管理系统仍占主导地位。为了了解这种状况,本研究旨在调查坦桑尼亚公共部门组织中记录管理系统的使用情况。 设计/方法/途径 本研究采用了描述性研究设计,同时还使用了定量和定性方法。共有 81 名受访者来自三个公共部门组织。为了获得样本,采用了非概率(方便和有目的)抽样技术。采用横向调查问卷和访谈方法收集定量和定性数据。为了分析定量和定性数据,研究人员使用了混合方法分析。此外,研究结果表明,很大一部分记录是通过现有记录的数字化创建的。除此之外,研究还揭示了政府机构在系统中管理的不同类型的记录。研究限制/影响本研究的影响是多方面的。具体来说,研究结果扩展了理论知识体系,为政府部门使用档案管理系统提供了新的见解。研究结果还为政府制定和改进法律法规框架以加强档案管理提供了依据。除此以外,研究结果还可能使档案从业人员受益,因为他们可以制定包容性战略,不仅能提高档案管理的有效性,还能促进档案管理的可持续性。这些研究并未广泛强调用于管理记录的系统。因此,人们对政府部门使用的档案管理系统知之甚少。本研究确定了公共部门组织使用的记录管理系统。
{"title":"Use of records management systems in Tanzania public sector organisations","authors":"Josephine Manase, Kelefa Mwantimwa, Tumpe Ndimbwa","doi":"10.1108/rmj-12-2021-0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-12-2021-0041","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Paper-based records management systems remain dominant in Tanzanian Government organisations despite the increase in digital records management systems adoption across the globe. To create an understanding of this state, this study aims to investigate the use of records management systems in Tanzanian public sector organisations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A descriptive research design was used in this study, alongside quantitative and qualitative approaches. A total of 81 respondents were drawn from three public sector organisations. To get a sample, non-probability (convenience and purposive) sampling techniques were used. A cross-sectional survey questionnaire and interview methods were used to gather quantitative and qualitative data. To analyse quantitative and qualitative data, the researchers used a mixed-methods analysis.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The study reveals different types of records management systems used in public sector organisations. Besides, the findings suggest that a large proportion of records are created through the digitisation of existing records. Aside from that, the study has revealed different types of records managed in the systems by government organisations. According to the study, there are various factors that determine the effective use of records management systems in public sector organisations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The implications of the present study are diverse. Specifically, its findings expand the theoretical body of knowledge by adding new insights regarding records management systems usage in government offices. The findings also provide the government with a basis for formulating and improving legal and regulatory frameworks to enhance records management. Apart from this, the findings are likely to benefit records practitioners by orchestrating inclusive strategies that will promote, not only effectiveness, but also sustainability in records management.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000In Tanzania, a few studies have been conducted to examine digital records management practices and systems. These studies have not extensively highlighted the systems used to manage the records. This makes little to be known on the systems used to manage records in government offices. The present study has ascertained records management systems used in public sector organisations.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141919890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conceptual framework to explore artificial intelligence technology (AIT) readiness and adoption intention in records and information management (RIM) practices: a proposal 探索人工智能技术(AIT)在记录和信息管理(RIM)实践中的准备情况和采用意向的概念框架:一项建议
IF 1.4 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-09-2023-0046
Liah Shonhe

Purpose

This research proposal aims to address the growing significance of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the field of records and information management (RIM) within the African context. Despite the increasing prevalence of AI, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the factors influencing AI readiness and adoption in RIM. The primary purpose of this paper is to explore these factors and propose an AI readiness and adoption conceptual framework.

Design/methodology/approach

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the proposed variables and support the hypothesis development. The theoretical foundation of the proposed conceptual framework is based on three theories: the technology acceptance model (TAM), the technology readiness index (TRI) and the cognitive appraisal theory (CAT).

Findings

The literature reveals that there is a lack of empirical investigation of AI readiness and adoption within the RIM context. Through the proposed conceptual model, the researcher anticipates uncovering critical insights into the factors influencing AI readiness and adoption in RIM practices across African nations.

Research limitations/implications

The proposed model is not yet empirically tested and the study's scope is limited to African nations.

Originality/value

The proposed model takes a pioneering approach to empirically investigate AI readiness and adoption within the RIM field, specifically in an African context which is understudied.

目的 本研究提案旨在探讨人工智能(AI)技术在非洲记录和信息管理(RIM)领域日益重要的意义。尽管人工智能日益普及,但对影响人工智能在记录和信息管理领域的准备和采用的因素却缺乏全面的了解。本文的主要目的是探讨这些因素,并提出一个人工智能就绪和采用的概念框架。提出的概念框架的理论基础基于三个理论:技术接受模型(TAM)、技术就绪指数(TRI)和认知评估理论(CAT)。通过提出的概念模型,研究人员预计将揭示影响非洲国家 RIM 实践中人工智能准备和采用情况的关键因素。研究局限性/影响提出的模型尚未经过实证检验,研究范围仅限于非洲国家。
{"title":"Conceptual framework to explore artificial intelligence technology (AIT) readiness and adoption intention in records and information management (RIM) practices: a proposal","authors":"Liah Shonhe","doi":"10.1108/rmj-09-2023-0046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-09-2023-0046","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This research proposal aims to address the growing significance of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the field of records and information management (RIM) within the African context. Despite the increasing prevalence of AI, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the factors influencing AI readiness and adoption in RIM. The primary purpose of this paper is to explore these factors and propose an AI readiness and adoption conceptual framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the proposed variables and support the hypothesis development. The theoretical foundation of the proposed conceptual framework is based on three theories: the technology acceptance model (TAM), the technology readiness index (TRI) and the cognitive appraisal theory (CAT).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The literature reveals that there is a lack of empirical investigation of AI readiness and adoption within the RIM context. Through the proposed conceptual model, the researcher anticipates uncovering critical insights into the factors influencing AI readiness and adoption in RIM practices across African nations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\u0000<p>The proposed model is not yet empirically tested and the study's scope is limited to African nations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The proposed model takes a pioneering approach to empirically investigate AI readiness and adoption within the RIM field, specifically in an African context which is understudied.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141770088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Participatory and proactive: real-time rights-based recordkeeping governance for the alternative care of children 参与性和前瞻性:基于权利的儿童替代照料实时记录管理
IF 1.4 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1108/rmj-11-2023-0069
Joanne Evans, Moira Paterson, Melissa Castan, Jade Purtell, Mya Ballin

Purpose

This study aims to make the case for real-time rights-based recordkeeping governance as a new foundation for the regulation and systemisation of multiple rights in recordkeeping for the Alternative Care of children and young people.

Design/methodology/approach

This article aims to make the case for real-time rights-based recordkeeping governance as a new foundation for the regulation and systemisation of multiple rights in recordkeeping for the Alternative Care of children and young people. It investigates this concept using the Australian context as a critical case study to highlight some of the current limitations in Australian Alternative Care systems in the way recordkeeping rights are represented in existing regulatory frameworks and monitored in practice. This paper will argue for the need for systemic transformations in child protection and information legislation and regulatory systems to better represent and enact alternative care recordkeeping rights.

Findings

This analysis of the legislative provisions for participation in recordkeeping and access to records of Care experiences against the Australian Charter of Lifelong Rights in Childhood Recordkeeping in Out-of-Home Care reveals a number of limitations. While the direct provision of rights to access records and the strengthening of principles of participation in some of the jurisdictions are welcome, it illustrates how the risk-oriented focus of the legislation on child protection investigations and substantiations encodes opaque recordkeeping practices and works against the provision of the full suite of childhood recordkeeping rights envisaged by the charter. Furthermore, without provisions for systemic and dynamic oversight, those with Care experiences are left to pursue individual outcomes against significant bureaucratic odds.

Research limitations/implications

In line with international recognition that active participation and proactive provision of rights are a protective factor, this article contends that governance frameworks need to be proactively designed to respect and enact recordkeeping rights, along with requiring mechanisms for real-time monitoring and oversight if the records problems of the past are not to be perpetuated.

Practical implications

The study’s proposal for the need for a real-time, rights-based recordkeeping governance seeks to address the systemic recordkeeping problems that have been identified in research and public inquiry related to Alternative Care systems in Australia as well as in the UK.

Social implications

Adopting a governance model that prioritises real-time, rights-based principles will ultimately impact how the Alternative Care system approaches records and their value in the processes of care.

×
文献原料 相关产品
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1