Genre Effect on L2 Syntactic Complexity and Holistic Rating for Writing Quality of Intermediate EFL Learners

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1515/CJAL-2021-0029
Lili Zhang, Haitao Liu
{"title":"Genre Effect on L2 Syntactic Complexity and Holistic Rating for Writing Quality of Intermediate EFL Learners","authors":"Lili Zhang, Haitao Liu","doi":"10.1515/CJAL-2021-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This exploratory study examines whether genre has an impact on syntactic complexity and holistic rating in EFL writing. Over 300 sample texts produced by intermediate learners were collected from a test and some regular after-class assignments for English writing courses. Each participant completed two writing tasks, one argumentative and the other narrative. Results show that genre type has a significant impact on L2 syntactic complexity. Genre effect is found stronger with timed writing tasks. L2 holistic ratings show correlation with syntactic complexity on the different measure(s) depending on genre type and planning conditions. Regression analyses reveal that for timed writing tasks, clausal density (clauses per sentence) is a reliable predictor for holistic assessment on intermediate EFL learners’ writing quality. It is found to account for 6% of the score variance for timed writing and 10% for timed argumentative writing. Genre is evidenced to be related to EFL writing holistic ratings. Closer examination indicates that while syntactic complexity is predictive of holistic writing scores for argumentative writing, it does not correlate with holistic scores for narrative writing. Other linguistic features rather than syntactic complexity may be accountable. Overall, the study lends support to genre effect in the relationship between syntactic complexity and L2 writing quality holistic rating.","PeriodicalId":43185,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"451 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2021-0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This exploratory study examines whether genre has an impact on syntactic complexity and holistic rating in EFL writing. Over 300 sample texts produced by intermediate learners were collected from a test and some regular after-class assignments for English writing courses. Each participant completed two writing tasks, one argumentative and the other narrative. Results show that genre type has a significant impact on L2 syntactic complexity. Genre effect is found stronger with timed writing tasks. L2 holistic ratings show correlation with syntactic complexity on the different measure(s) depending on genre type and planning conditions. Regression analyses reveal that for timed writing tasks, clausal density (clauses per sentence) is a reliable predictor for holistic assessment on intermediate EFL learners’ writing quality. It is found to account for 6% of the score variance for timed writing and 10% for timed argumentative writing. Genre is evidenced to be related to EFL writing holistic ratings. Closer examination indicates that while syntactic complexity is predictive of holistic writing scores for argumentative writing, it does not correlate with holistic scores for narrative writing. Other linguistic features rather than syntactic complexity may be accountable. Overall, the study lends support to genre effect in the relationship between syntactic complexity and L2 writing quality holistic rating.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体裁对二语句法复杂性的影响及对中级英语学习者写作质量的整体评价
摘要本研究旨在探讨体裁对英语写作中句法复杂性和整体评分的影响。本文收集了300多篇由中级学习者编写的样本文本,这些样本文本来自英语写作课程的一次测试和一些常规的课后作业。每位参与者完成两项写作任务,一项是议论文,另一项是叙事性写作。结果表明,文体类型对二语句法复杂性有显著影响。体裁效应在定时写作任务中更强。第二语言整体评分在不同的体裁类型和规划条件下与句法复杂性存在相关性。回归分析表明,对于限时写作任务,小句密度(每句从句数)是全面评估中级英语学习者写作质量的可靠预测指标。研究发现,它在定时写作和定时议论文写作中分别占6%和10%的分数差异。体裁与英语写作的整体评分有关。更仔细的研究表明,虽然句法复杂性预测了议论文写作的整体写作分数,但它与叙事写作的整体得分无关。其他语言特征而不是句法复杂性可能是负责任的。总体而言,本研究支持体裁效应在句法复杂性与二语写作质量整体评分关系中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
377
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (CJAL) (formerly known as Teaching English in China – CELEA Journal) was created in 1978 as a newsletter by the British Council, Beijing. It is the affiliated journal of the China English Language Education Association (founded in 1981 and now the Chinese affiliate of AILA [International Association of Applied Linguistics]). The Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics is the only English language teaching (ELT) journal in China that is published in English, serving as a window to Chinese reform on ELT for professionals in China and around the world. The journal is internationally focused, fully refereed, and its articles address a wide variety of topics in Chinese applied linguistics which include – but also reach beyond – the topics of language education and second language acquisition.
期刊最新文献
Metadiscourse in MOOC Video Lectures: Comparison with University Lectures and Disciplinary Variation “Here, We Investigate If There Is …”: A Functional Investigation of Self-Mentions in Research Article Abstracts Building Successful Communication in EMI Contexts: A Multimodal Approach to Organizational Metadiscourse in Intercultural Lectures One Journal, Different Practices: A Corpus-Based Study of Interactive Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics Digesting Psychology: Metadiscourse as a Recontextualising Tool in the Digital Communication of Disciplinary Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1