Making Love Public: The Paradoxes of Intimacy in Henry James’s The Wings of the Dove

Magda Majewska
{"title":"Making Love Public: The Paradoxes of Intimacy in Henry James’s The Wings of the Dove","authors":"Magda Majewska","doi":"10.18422/71-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the paradoxes pertaining to romantic love in Henry James’ The Wings of the Dove. Drawing on love sociology (Luhmann, Illouz) it explores the ways in which James places the love and courtship of his protagonists Merton Densher and Kate Croy in a complex and shifting relation to the private and the public. As sociologists and cultural historians inform us, “romantic love“—a notion that links love and marriage—emerged only in the late 18th century as an ideal advocated by sentimentalism and romanticism and then gained popularity throughout the 19th century. Its emergence was concomitant with the rise of the middle class, the rise of the novel, and the growing separation of the private and the public spheres. Indeed, as Niklas Luhmann argues in his seminal study Love as Passion, the differentiation of the private or intimate sphere—a sphere defined by personal/intimate relations as opposed to impersonal ones—begins with the cultural codification of love. It was only after love and marriage became linked that marriage gained its status as a private affair and the family came to be regarded as the sphere of privacy. This already suggests a paradox built into the idea of romantic love: while love came to be understood as the most intimate relation between two people and as central for the demarcation of the private sphere, it also needed to be made public in order to remain what it was. This paradox is reflected in one of the major ironies of James’ novel: Kate’s decision neither to publicly acknowledge their relationship nor to conduct it in secret, but rather to appear publicly and act privately as if there was nothing to disavow in the first place, leads to the disintegration of their intimate bond. Suggesting that the performative effects of Kate and Merton’s public actions eventually render their intimate bond nonexistent, James exposes the paradox at the heart of romantic love.","PeriodicalId":30064,"journal":{"name":"American Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18422/71-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the paradoxes pertaining to romantic love in Henry James’ The Wings of the Dove. Drawing on love sociology (Luhmann, Illouz) it explores the ways in which James places the love and courtship of his protagonists Merton Densher and Kate Croy in a complex and shifting relation to the private and the public. As sociologists and cultural historians inform us, “romantic love“—a notion that links love and marriage—emerged only in the late 18th century as an ideal advocated by sentimentalism and romanticism and then gained popularity throughout the 19th century. Its emergence was concomitant with the rise of the middle class, the rise of the novel, and the growing separation of the private and the public spheres. Indeed, as Niklas Luhmann argues in his seminal study Love as Passion, the differentiation of the private or intimate sphere—a sphere defined by personal/intimate relations as opposed to impersonal ones—begins with the cultural codification of love. It was only after love and marriage became linked that marriage gained its status as a private affair and the family came to be regarded as the sphere of privacy. This already suggests a paradox built into the idea of romantic love: while love came to be understood as the most intimate relation between two people and as central for the demarcation of the private sphere, it also needed to be made public in order to remain what it was. This paradox is reflected in one of the major ironies of James’ novel: Kate’s decision neither to publicly acknowledge their relationship nor to conduct it in secret, but rather to appear publicly and act privately as if there was nothing to disavow in the first place, leads to the disintegration of their intimate bond. Suggesting that the performative effects of Kate and Merton’s public actions eventually render their intimate bond nonexistent, James exposes the paradox at the heart of romantic love.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公开爱:亨利·詹姆斯《鸽子的翅膀》中的亲密悖论
本文着重探讨亨利·詹姆斯的《鸽子的翅膀》中浪漫爱情的悖论。它借鉴了爱情社会学(Luhmann,Illouz),探讨了詹姆斯如何将主人公默顿·丹舍和凯特·克罗伊的爱情和求爱置于一种复杂而多变的私人和公众关系中。正如社会学家和文化历史学家告诉我们的那样,“浪漫的爱情“——一个将爱情和婚姻联系在一起的概念——在18世纪末才作为感伤主义和浪漫主义倡导的理想出现,然后在整个19世纪广受欢迎。它的出现伴随着中产阶级的崛起、小说的兴起以及私人和公共领域的日益分离tudy爱即激情,私人或亲密领域的区分——一个由个人/亲密关系与非个人关系定义的领域——始于爱的文化编纂。只有在爱情和婚姻联系在一起之后,婚姻才获得了私人事务的地位,家庭才被视为隐私范围。这已经表明了浪漫爱情思想中的一个悖论:虽然爱情被理解为两个人之间最亲密的关系,是划分私人领域的核心,但它也需要公开,才能保持原样。这种悖论反映在詹姆斯小说中的一个主要讽刺中:凯特决定既不公开承认他们的关系,也不秘密进行,而是公开露面,私下行事,就好像一开始没有什么可否认的一样,这导致了他们亲密关系的破裂。詹姆斯暗示凯特和默顿公开行为的表演效果最终使他们的亲密关系不存在,他揭露了浪漫爱情的核心矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spending Time in the Nineteenth Century Melville’s Majestic Missive:“Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street” Ishmael’s Night of Rest and Relaxation Data, Maps, Networks – Digital Approaches to Reading (in) Nineteenth-Century Literature Making Love Public: The Paradoxes of Intimacy in Henry James’s The Wings of the Dove
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1