The use of commercial mediation as alternative dispute resolution tool in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia

József Poór, Radka Lankašová, Allen Engle, K. Szabó, Ildikó Budavári-Takács, Zoltán Šeben, Róbert Korényi, Péter Szitás, Tímea Juhász
{"title":"The use of commercial mediation as alternative dispute resolution tool in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia","authors":"József Poór, Radka Lankašová, Allen Engle, K. Szabó, Ildikó Budavári-Takács, Zoltán Šeben, Róbert Korényi, Péter Szitás, Tímea Juhász","doi":"10.5937/aneksub2145003p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a long time, various companies and organizations have used traditional courts or other legal tools to resolve different complex disputes or problems. However, numerous influencing factors often interrupted this formalized problem-solving approach. In the countries of the former Eastern bloc, under the former Communist system, the Party often acted as mediator. This, of course, has changed totally since the political system has become democratic. Our study investigates conflict-solving styles, procedures and processes in Central Europe - the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. The study done in 297 companies in these three countries show that conflicts between individuals, employees and the company are found most often, while problems between the local company and associated parent companies are less frequently found. Regardless of the country, companies have spent at least 10% of their working time dealing with internal conflicts. Some 79% of organizations focus on managing external conflicts for at least 10% of their working time, while around 9% of companies use mediation as a method of resolving conflict. The organizations in the study do not differ from country to country in terms of the use and success of mediation practices.","PeriodicalId":33873,"journal":{"name":"Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/aneksub2145003p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time, various companies and organizations have used traditional courts or other legal tools to resolve different complex disputes or problems. However, numerous influencing factors often interrupted this formalized problem-solving approach. In the countries of the former Eastern bloc, under the former Communist system, the Party often acted as mediator. This, of course, has changed totally since the political system has become democratic. Our study investigates conflict-solving styles, procedures and processes in Central Europe - the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. The study done in 297 companies in these three countries show that conflicts between individuals, employees and the company are found most often, while problems between the local company and associated parent companies are less frequently found. Regardless of the country, companies have spent at least 10% of their working time dealing with internal conflicts. Some 79% of organizations focus on managing external conflicts for at least 10% of their working time, while around 9% of companies use mediation as a method of resolving conflict. The organizations in the study do not differ from country to country in terms of the use and success of mediation practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克共和国、匈牙利和斯洛伐克使用商事调解作为替代性争端解决工具
长期以来,各种公司和组织都使用传统的法院或其他法律工具来解决不同的复杂纠纷或问题。然而,许多影响因素经常打断这种形式化的解决问题方法。在前东方集团国家,在前共产主义体制下,党经常充当调解人。当然,自从政治制度变得民主以来,这种情况已经完全改变了。我们的研究调查了中欧——捷克共和国、斯洛伐克和匈牙利——解决冲突的方式、程序和过程。这项针对这三个国家297家公司的研究表明,个人、员工和公司之间的冲突最为常见,而当地公司和相关母公司之间的问题则不太常见。无论在哪个国家,公司至少有10%的工作时间用于处理内部冲突。约79%的组织至少有10%的工作时间专注于管理外部冲突,而约9%的公司将调解作为解决冲突的一种方法。研究中的组织在调解做法的使用和成功方面没有因国而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Phillips curve be applied in selected European countries today? Effects of the NPL on the banks' profitability during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of the Republic of Serbia Residential real estate analysis in Serbia The determinants of government expenditures in Serbia: The application of ARDL model Key determinants of consumers' decision making on the purchase of wristwatches on the Serbian market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1