Cost Efficiency Vis-à-Vis Revenue Efficiency Analysis of Indian Scheduled Commercial Banks in a Dynamic Environment

IF 0.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT NMIMS Management Review Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI:10.53908/nmmr.290204
A. Bhatia, Megha Mahendru
{"title":"Cost Efficiency Vis-à-Vis Revenue Efficiency Analysis of Indian Scheduled Commercial Banks in a Dynamic Environment","authors":"A. Bhatia, Megha Mahendru","doi":"10.53908/nmmr.290204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper endeavours to analyze Cost Efficiency vis-à-visRevenue Efficiency of Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) as well as across ownership in India. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been employed to calculate the efficiency scores of SCBs over five points of time i.e. 2000-01, 2004-05, 2008- 09, 2012-13 and 2016-17. The differences in the efficiency scores are examined by applying Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results of Cost and Revenue Efficiency of Indian Scheduled Commercial Banks highlight that the highest level of inefficiency subsist on the cost side as Scheduled Commercial Banks have higher Revenue Efficiency scores in comparison to Cost Efficiency scores. Cost Efficiency across ownership shows that Public Sector Banks have higher Cost Efficiency in 2000-01. Private Sector Banks are cost efficient in 2004-05 while Foreign Sector Banks show higher Cost Efficiency scores in 2008-09, 2012-13 and 2016-17. Revenue Efficiency scores shows that Public Sector Banks have higher scores as compared to Private and Foreign Sector Banks in the 2000-01 and 2004-05. Foreign Sector Banks are revenue efficient in 2008-09 and 2016-17 with Private Sector Banks taking the lead in 2012-13. The results of ANOVA reveal that there exists a statistically significant difference in Cost Efficiency and Revenue Efficiency among banks in different sectors over different points of time.","PeriodicalId":43057,"journal":{"name":"NMIMS Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMIMS Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53908/nmmr.290204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper endeavours to analyze Cost Efficiency vis-à-visRevenue Efficiency of Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) as well as across ownership in India. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been employed to calculate the efficiency scores of SCBs over five points of time i.e. 2000-01, 2004-05, 2008- 09, 2012-13 and 2016-17. The differences in the efficiency scores are examined by applying Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results of Cost and Revenue Efficiency of Indian Scheduled Commercial Banks highlight that the highest level of inefficiency subsist on the cost side as Scheduled Commercial Banks have higher Revenue Efficiency scores in comparison to Cost Efficiency scores. Cost Efficiency across ownership shows that Public Sector Banks have higher Cost Efficiency in 2000-01. Private Sector Banks are cost efficient in 2004-05 while Foreign Sector Banks show higher Cost Efficiency scores in 2008-09, 2012-13 and 2016-17. Revenue Efficiency scores shows that Public Sector Banks have higher scores as compared to Private and Foreign Sector Banks in the 2000-01 and 2004-05. Foreign Sector Banks are revenue efficient in 2008-09 and 2016-17 with Private Sector Banks taking the lead in 2012-13. The results of ANOVA reveal that there exists a statistically significant difference in Cost Efficiency and Revenue Efficiency among banks in different sectors over different points of time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态环境下印度定期商业银行的成本效率-收入效率分析
本文试图分析印度表列商业银行的成本效率与收入效率以及所有权之间的关系。数据包络分析(DEA)已被用于计算五个时间点(即2000-01、2004-05、2008-09、2012-13和2016-17)的SCB效率得分。通过应用方差分析(ANOVA)来检验效率得分的差异。印度定期商业银行的成本和收入效率的结果突出表明,成本方面存在最高水平的低效率,因为与成本效率得分相比,定期商业银行具有更高的收入效率得分。所有制的成本效率表明,公共部门银行在2000-01年具有更高的成本效率。私营部门银行在2004-05年具有成本效益,而外国部门银行在2008-09年、2012-13年和2016-17年的成本效益得分更高。收入效率得分显示,在2000-01年和2004-05年,公共部门银行的得分高于私营和外国部门银行。外资银行在2008-09年和2016-17年的收入效率较高,私营银行在2012-13年处于领先地位。方差分析结果表明,不同行业的银行在不同时间点的成本效率和收益效率存在统计学显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
The Changing Landscape of Financial Services in the Age of Digitalization: A Bibliometric Analysis Consumer Confusion on Cognitive Dissonance: A Conceptual Framework Impact of Financial Distress on the Firm’s Efficiency in India: Using Shareholder Activism and Profit Before Interest and Tax as a Moderator YouTube “Unboxing:” An Influencer of Purchase Intent—A Quantitative Study Integrating Technology Acceptance Model, Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Planned Behaviour to Study the Adoption of Facebook Marketplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1