Angela Merkel’s Record on Immigration and Gender

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE German Politics Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1080/09644008.2021.1996563
A. Street
{"title":"Angela Merkel’s Record on Immigration and Gender","authors":"A. Street","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2021.1996563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Angela Merkel served as Chancellor at a time when German society was quickly diversifying due to immigration. Her policy choices now shape the life chances of millions of immigrants and their descendants. These choices also set the terms on which Germans will decide which divisions and which forms of solidarity will characterise the society in the years to come. Merkel was more willing to accept the reality of immigration than earlier CDU leaders. And yet I argue that, faced with rapid societal change, the Merkel governments generally avoided deep reforms of existing institutions, even those that yield sharp disparities by immigration status and gender. I find that, although Merkel focused on economic integration and female labour force participation, immigrant-origin residents have made only slow progress in these areas, though educational disparities have narrowed. Additionally, millions of long-term residents still lack German citizenship and the right to vote, so that their voices are muted in debates over what it means to be German. Meanwhile support for anti-immigrant extremists has surged. I conclude that it is an open question whether Merkel’s conservative approach will provide a stable basis for the economic, social, and political consolidation of a more diverse Germany.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"31 1","pages":"137 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.1996563","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Angela Merkel served as Chancellor at a time when German society was quickly diversifying due to immigration. Her policy choices now shape the life chances of millions of immigrants and their descendants. These choices also set the terms on which Germans will decide which divisions and which forms of solidarity will characterise the society in the years to come. Merkel was more willing to accept the reality of immigration than earlier CDU leaders. And yet I argue that, faced with rapid societal change, the Merkel governments generally avoided deep reforms of existing institutions, even those that yield sharp disparities by immigration status and gender. I find that, although Merkel focused on economic integration and female labour force participation, immigrant-origin residents have made only slow progress in these areas, though educational disparities have narrowed. Additionally, millions of long-term residents still lack German citizenship and the right to vote, so that their voices are muted in debates over what it means to be German. Meanwhile support for anti-immigrant extremists has surged. I conclude that it is an open question whether Merkel’s conservative approach will provide a stable basis for the economic, social, and political consolidation of a more diverse Germany.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安格拉·默克尔在移民和性别问题上的记录
摘要安格拉·默克尔担任德国总理时,德国社会正因移民而迅速多元化。她的政策选择现在决定了数百万移民及其后代的生活机会。这些选择还规定了德国人将在未来几年决定社会特征的分裂和团结形式。与早期的基民盟领导人相比,默克尔更愿意接受移民的现实。然而,我认为,面对快速的社会变革,默克尔政府通常避免对现有机构进行深入改革,即使是那些在移民身份和性别方面产生巨大差异的机构。我发现,尽管默克尔专注于经济一体化和女性劳动力参与,但移民出身的居民在这些领域进展缓慢,尽管教育差距已经缩小。此外,数百万长期居民仍然缺乏德国公民身份和投票权,因此在关于身为德国人意味着什么的辩论中,他们的声音被压制了。与此同时,对反移民极端分子的支持激增。我的结论是,默克尔的保守做法是否会为一个更加多样化的德国的经济、社会和政治巩固提供稳定的基础,这是一个悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Against All Odds? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Political Debate About the German Passenger Car Toll Act German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany Erythrocyte fatty acid aberrations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Correlation with disease duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1