Exploring everyday food provisioning: the teleoaffectivity of meal sharing

IF 1.2 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Food and Foodways Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07409710.2023.2162200
E. Veen, S. Wahlen, Lian Angelino
{"title":"Exploring everyday food provisioning: the teleoaffectivity of meal sharing","authors":"E. Veen, S. Wahlen, Lian Angelino","doi":"10.1080/07409710.2023.2162200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sharing platforms gained importance in recent years. Little is known about whether and why novel means to digitally share meals are incorporated into people’s everyday portfolios of everyday food provisioning. The objective of this paper is accordingly to explore why digitally mediated meal sharing is incorporated (or not) into an array of everyday food provisioning practices. We use observations of and interviews with users of the Dutch platform Thuisgekookt, on which home cooks offer meals to be picked up by neighbors. Our practice theoretically inspired analysis starts with the concept of teleoaffective structures. These consist of a teleological dimension which points to objects (such as food) motivating action. The second, affective dimension indicates motivational engagement and emotional states. Three teleoaffective episodes - anticipating, actualizing and assessing - assist in explaining why meal sharing recruits practitioners (or not). We find that while meal sharing has advantages over other food provisioning practices, the generated affect is often not sufficient to recruit the new means of digitally mediated meal sharing in daily life, especially because of meal sharing’s relative inconvenience. Temporal conditions as well as a limited array of food provisioning practices, however, afford coordination of meal sharing with other everyday practices. The three episodes of teleoaffectivity enabled the understanding that meal sharing is not only evaluated on its own terms, but also anticipated and assessed in relation to other options and the recruitment of practitioners proofed difficult.","PeriodicalId":45423,"journal":{"name":"Food and Foodways","volume":"31 1","pages":"22 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Foodways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2023.2162200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Sharing platforms gained importance in recent years. Little is known about whether and why novel means to digitally share meals are incorporated into people’s everyday portfolios of everyday food provisioning. The objective of this paper is accordingly to explore why digitally mediated meal sharing is incorporated (or not) into an array of everyday food provisioning practices. We use observations of and interviews with users of the Dutch platform Thuisgekookt, on which home cooks offer meals to be picked up by neighbors. Our practice theoretically inspired analysis starts with the concept of teleoaffective structures. These consist of a teleological dimension which points to objects (such as food) motivating action. The second, affective dimension indicates motivational engagement and emotional states. Three teleoaffective episodes - anticipating, actualizing and assessing - assist in explaining why meal sharing recruits practitioners (or not). We find that while meal sharing has advantages over other food provisioning practices, the generated affect is often not sufficient to recruit the new means of digitally mediated meal sharing in daily life, especially because of meal sharing’s relative inconvenience. Temporal conditions as well as a limited array of food provisioning practices, however, afford coordination of meal sharing with other everyday practices. The three episodes of teleoaffectivity enabled the understanding that meal sharing is not only evaluated on its own terms, but also anticipated and assessed in relation to other options and the recruitment of practitioners proofed difficult.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索日常食物供应:用餐共享的目的情感
近年来,共享平台变得越来越重要。对于数字分享食物的新方式是否以及为什么会被纳入人们的日常食物供应组合,人们知之甚少。因此,本文的目的是探讨为什么数字媒介的膳食共享被纳入(或不纳入)日常食物供应实践的数组。我们对荷兰平台Thuisgekookt的用户进行了观察和采访,在这个平台上,家庭厨师提供饭菜让邻居来取。我们的实践理论启发分析从远情感结构的概念开始。这些包括目的论维度,指向物体(如食物)激励行为。第二,情感维度表示动机投入和情绪状态。三个远程情感事件——预测、实现和评估——有助于解释为什么共享餐食会招募(或不招募)实践者。我们发现,虽然共享用餐比其他食物供应方式有优势,但所产生的影响往往不足以在日常生活中招募数字媒介的用餐新手段,特别是因为共享用餐相对不方便。然而,时间条件以及有限的食物供应做法,使人们能够与其他日常做法协调用餐。远程情感的三次发作使人们了解到,共享餐点不仅是根据其本身的条件进行评估,而且还根据其他选择进行预期和评估,而且招聘从业人员证明是困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Foodways
Food and Foodways ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Food and Foodways is a refereed, interdisciplinary, and international journal devoted to publishing original scholarly articles on the history and culture of human nourishment. By reflecting on the role food plays in human relations, this unique journal explores the powerful but often subtle ways in which food has shaped, and shapes, our lives socially, economically, politically, mentally, nutritionally, and morally. Because food is a pervasive social phenomenon, it cannot be approached by any one discipline. We encourage articles that engage dialogue, debate, and exchange across disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Dinner under the camel thorn trees: The safari tourist’s travel back in time A taste of freedom: in-cell group cooking and culinary redemption in an Israeli prison North-Atlantic gastrotourism on the move: constructing the Faroe Islands as a food destination The Chile is my uncle: Spicy kinship between humans and more-than-humans in the Sikkimese Himalayas Hunting, foraging and the pursuit of animal ontologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1