The Deadweight Loss of Active Management

SSRN Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3947150
Moshe Levy
{"title":"The Deadweight Loss of Active Management","authors":"Moshe Levy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3947150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the performance of US active equity funds based on their Sharpe ratios. Only 13% of funds outperform the market index after fees. We estimate the aggregate annual loss to investors in US active equity funds at $235 billion. This loss can be decomposed into an inefficient portfolio allocation component of $186 billion, and a fees component of $49 billion. The loss estimate based on Sharpe ratios is about 10 times larger than estimates based on alphas, and we argue that Sharpe ratios are more relevant from the perspective of most investors. We discuss possible explanations for the persistence of this large inefficiency and suggest ways to mitigate it.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"32 1","pages":"17 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3947150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We evaluate the performance of US active equity funds based on their Sharpe ratios. Only 13% of funds outperform the market index after fees. We estimate the aggregate annual loss to investors in US active equity funds at $235 billion. This loss can be decomposed into an inefficient portfolio allocation component of $186 billion, and a fees component of $49 billion. The loss estimate based on Sharpe ratios is about 10 times larger than estimates based on alphas, and we argue that Sharpe ratios are more relevant from the perspective of most investors. We discuss possible explanations for the persistence of this large inefficiency and suggest ways to mitigate it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动管理的无谓损失
我们根据美国主动股票基金的夏普比率来评估它们的表现。只有13%的基金在扣除费用后表现优于市场指数。我们估计,美国主动股票基金的投资者每年的总损失为2350亿美元。这种损失可以分解为1860亿美元的低效投资组合分配部分和490亿美元的费用部分。基于夏普比率的损失估计大约是基于阿尔法的估计的10倍,我们认为,从大多数投资者的角度来看,夏普比率更具相关性。我们讨论了这种大规模低效持续存在的可能解释,并提出了缓解这种低效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stocks as a Hedge against Inflation: Does Corporate Profitability Keep Up with Inflation? How Useful Is a Prospectus in Identifying Greenwashing versus True ESG Funds? Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing The Hidden Cost in Costless Put-Spread Collars: Rebalance Timing Luck Investing in Carbon Credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1