Radical Rhetoric: Toward a Telos of Solidarity

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Rhetoric & Public Affairs Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0207
Noor Ghazal Aswad
{"title":"Radical Rhetoric: Toward a Telos of Solidarity","authors":"Noor Ghazal Aswad","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Transnational rhetorical scholarship has yet to enact meaningful solidarity with the subaltern. \"Inclusionary\" efforts have actively excluded what I term the \"radical subject,\" the subject revolting against repressive hegemonic forces to achieve liberatory change in society. Without privileging the radical subject and a critique of freedom over a critique of domination, hegemonic narratives continue uninterrupted. This paper turns toward the Syrian revolution to illustrate how critical rhetoric does not stretch far enough for the radical subject. I propose a radical rhetorical paradigm that centers the radical subject's lived knowledge as determining meaning. This approach realizes the wisdom in relinquishing skepticism during the critical reasoning process by placing the radical subject as the starting point in inquiry in contested spaces where negotiation over meaning is ongoing. It acknowledges the radical subject's testimony as born of the epistemic relevance of social location and the boundedness of knowledge. The radical rhetorical approach consecrates the epistemologies of the radical subject as inculcating the imperative for action on behalf of the oppressed.","PeriodicalId":45013,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","volume":"24 1","pages":"207 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:Transnational rhetorical scholarship has yet to enact meaningful solidarity with the subaltern. "Inclusionary" efforts have actively excluded what I term the "radical subject," the subject revolting against repressive hegemonic forces to achieve liberatory change in society. Without privileging the radical subject and a critique of freedom over a critique of domination, hegemonic narratives continue uninterrupted. This paper turns toward the Syrian revolution to illustrate how critical rhetoric does not stretch far enough for the radical subject. I propose a radical rhetorical paradigm that centers the radical subject's lived knowledge as determining meaning. This approach realizes the wisdom in relinquishing skepticism during the critical reasoning process by placing the radical subject as the starting point in inquiry in contested spaces where negotiation over meaning is ongoing. It acknowledges the radical subject's testimony as born of the epistemic relevance of social location and the boundedness of knowledge. The radical rhetorical approach consecrates the epistemologies of the radical subject as inculcating the imperative for action on behalf of the oppressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激进修辞:走向团结
摘要:跨国修辞学学术界尚未与下层民众建立起有意义的团结。“包容性”努力积极排斥了我所说的“激进主体”,即反抗专制霸权势力以实现社会解放性变革的主体。在没有将激进主体和对自由的批判置于对统治的批判之上的情况下,霸权叙事继续不间断。本文转向叙利亚革命,以说明批判性言论对于激进主题来说不够深入。我提出了一种激进的修辞范式,以激进主体的生活知识为中心来确定意义。这种方法实现了在批判性推理过程中放弃怀疑的智慧,将激进主题作为探究的起点,在有争议的空间中,对意义的谈判正在进行。它承认激进主体的证词源于社会位置的认识相关性和知识的有界性。激进的修辞方法将激进主体的认识论神圣化为灌输为被压迫者采取行动的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Rhetoric & Public Affairs COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Satire as the Comic Public Sphere: Postmodern "Truthiness" and Civic Engagement by James E. Caron (review) Designing "The People": Constitutive Fractures in Contemporary Collectives Replacing Notorious: Barret, Ginsburg, and Postfeminist Positioning Informing a Nation: The Newspaper Presidency of Thomas Jefferson by Mel Laracey (review) Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates by Catherine Chaput (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1