Planners as middle actors in facilitating for city cycling

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Mobilities Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17450101.2023.2186799
Lina Ingeborgrud , Ivana Suboticki , Marianne Ryghaug , Tomas Moe Skjølsvold
{"title":"Planners as middle actors in facilitating for city cycling","authors":"Lina Ingeborgrud ,&nbsp;Ivana Suboticki ,&nbsp;Marianne Ryghaug ,&nbsp;Tomas Moe Skjølsvold","doi":"10.1080/17450101.2023.2186799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper explores the knowledge-making and efforts of planners in facilitating cycling in two Norwegian cities with high ambitions for developing more sustainable mobility modes through cycling. Building on empirical data from shadowing local planning agencies in the two cities, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, we argue that studying planners and their mediation work is crucial to understand how to transition to more sustainable mobility modes. We find that one reason for Trondheim’s success was that planners made continual efforts to mobilize a variety of people, ideas, and experiences. They developed new arenas for mediating meanings, co-creating of knowledge, and decision-making together with other actors, such as politicians and cyclists, while in Bergen planners operated with a clearer boundary between planning and politicians and use. Trondheim was thereby more successful in normalizing cycling in decision-making arenas and among citizens compared to Bergen. We, therefore, argue that mediation practices of planners is crucial in shaping planning cultures and governance regimes which can foster more sustainable mobility solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51457,"journal":{"name":"Mobilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S174501012300036X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper explores the knowledge-making and efforts of planners in facilitating cycling in two Norwegian cities with high ambitions for developing more sustainable mobility modes through cycling. Building on empirical data from shadowing local planning agencies in the two cities, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, we argue that studying planners and their mediation work is crucial to understand how to transition to more sustainable mobility modes. We find that one reason for Trondheim’s success was that planners made continual efforts to mobilize a variety of people, ideas, and experiences. They developed new arenas for mediating meanings, co-creating of knowledge, and decision-making together with other actors, such as politicians and cyclists, while in Bergen planners operated with a clearer boundary between planning and politicians and use. Trondheim was thereby more successful in normalizing cycling in decision-making arenas and among citizens compared to Bergen. We, therefore, argue that mediation practices of planners is crucial in shaping planning cultures and governance regimes which can foster more sustainable mobility solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规划者是促进城市自行车运动的中间参与者
这篇论文探讨了挪威两座城市的规划人员在促进骑自行车出行方面的知识积累和努力,这两座城市都雄心勃勃地希望通过骑自行车出行来发展更具可持续性的交通模式。通过对这两个城市的地方规划机构进行实地考察、半结构式访谈和文件分析,我们认为,研究规划人员及其调解工作对于了解如何过渡到更具可持续性的交通模式至关重要。我们发现,特隆赫姆成功的原因之一是规划师不断努力调动各种人员、想法和经验。他们与政治家和骑自行车的人等其他行动者一起,开发了调解意义、共同创造知识和决策的新舞台,而在卑尔根,规划者在规划与政治家和使用之间的界限更加清晰。因此,与卑尔根相比,特隆赫姆在使自行车运动在决策领域和公民中正常化方面更为成功。因此,我们认为,规划师的调解实践对于塑造规划文化和治理制度至关重要,而规划文化和治理制度可以促进更具可持续性的交通解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mobilities
Mobilities Multiple-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Mobilities examines both the large-scale movements of people, objects, capital, and information across the world, as well as more local processes of daily transportation, movement through public and private spaces, and the travel of material things in everyday life. Recent developments in transportation and communications infrastructures, along with new social and cultural practices of mobility, present new challenges for the coordination and governance of mobilities and for the protection of mobility rights and access. This has elicited many new research methods and theories relevant for understanding the connections between diverse mobilities and immobilities.
期刊最新文献
Re-storying gendered im/mobilities through a mobile and generationed autoethnography The mobility biography of things and the climate emergency Driving while dreaming: oneiric automobility (Im)mobile autobiography: the mobilisation of life without children auto/biography and its significance Mobility practices in a changing climate: Understanding shifts in car ownership and use across the life course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1