Natur zwischen Übermacht, Unschuld und Instrument

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1515/dzph-2021-0079
Agnès Grivaux
{"title":"Natur zwischen Übermacht, Unschuld und Instrument","authors":"Agnès Grivaux","doi":"10.1515/dzph-2021-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article emphasises the relevance of Adorno’s concept of nature for contemporary debates in critical theory about the relationship between nature and society. Adorno identifies a twofold danger for a critical understanding of our relationship to nature. While the first is in the development of a mythical vision of nature, the second is in the development of a purely instrumental relationship to nature, which considers nature as an entity radically heterogeneous to social issues. Against this backdrop, Adorno develops his own concept of nature which can be described as negative (non-mythical) and minimal (non-instrumental).","PeriodicalId":54099,"journal":{"name":"DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE","volume":"69 1","pages":"989 - 1002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2021-0079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article emphasises the relevance of Adorno’s concept of nature for contemporary debates in critical theory about the relationship between nature and society. Adorno identifies a twofold danger for a critical understanding of our relationship to nature. While the first is in the development of a mythical vision of nature, the second is in the development of a purely instrumental relationship to nature, which considers nature as an entity radically heterogeneous to social issues. Against this backdrop, Adorno develops his own concept of nature which can be described as negative (non-mythical) and minimal (non-instrumental).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
占优势和博爱的天性
摘要本文强调阿多诺的自然概念与当代批判理论中关于自然与社会关系的争论的相关性。阿多诺认为,批判性地理解我们与自然的关系存在双重危险。而第一个是在自然的神话愿景的发展中,第二个是在与自然的纯粹工具关系的发展中,它认为自然是一个与社会问题根本不同的实体。在这种背景下,阿多诺发展了他自己的自然概念,可以被描述为消极的(非神话的)和最小的(非工具的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Als offenes Diskussionsforum fördert die Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie den schulübergreifenden Dialog und die Kommunikation zwischen den philosophischen Kulturen. Vorrangig erscheinen Arbeiten, die aktiv in die moderne internationale philosophische Diskussion eingreifen und neue Denkansätze für sie liefern. Neben Fachaufsätzen und Essays, Interviews und Symposien publiziert die Zeitschrift Funde aus philosophischen Archiven, Diskussionen sowie Buchkritiken.
期刊最新文献
Selbstkritische Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung als Arbeit am Kanon Nochmals zu Mendelssohn, Kant und dem ontologischen Gottesbeweis Freiheit neu vorstellen: menschliches Handlungsvermögen in Zeiten der ökologischen Katastrophe Nachruf auf Dieter Henrich Darf die Ukraine kämpfen?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1