Peripheralization and Catching Up in Eastern Europe in Historical Perspective

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Evolution & History Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.30884/seh/2019.01.05
Andrea Komlosy, Hannes Hofbauer
{"title":"Peripheralization and Catching Up in Eastern Europe in Historical Perspective","authors":"Andrea Komlosy, Hannes Hofbauer","doi":"10.30884/seh/2019.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vienna ABSTRACT Starting from the historical roots of Eastern European peripheralization and orientalization in the framework of the unfolding unequal division of labour in Europe since the 16 th century, the article is discussing concepts and trajectories of “catching-up” between 1867 and 2004. Both associative dependent integration with the world-economic cores and self-reliant national or regional integration can be observed. The evaluation departs from four historical moments, 1867 (Austro-Hungarian Compromise), 1918, 1945 and 1989 with an outlook on the new geopolitical dividing lines and alliances after the dissolution of Comecon 1991 and the beginning of EU-enlargement towards Eastern Europe in 2004. Strategies, successes and limits are discussed in front of the interest of Western powers and Russia as well as geopolitical moments and cycles, offering opportunities and restrictions for governments to improve their national economy and international performance. In spite of undeniable upgrading processes in some periods, catching-up has been overshadowed by four fundamental traps: the growth trap, the national trap, the debt trap and the militarization trap, occuring at specific moments of the process, allowing to identify cycles of catching-up. Finally, as catching-up has been reproducing dependency and peripheralization in new forms, the concept of catching-up has to be","PeriodicalId":42677,"journal":{"name":"Social Evolution & History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Evolution & History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2019.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Vienna ABSTRACT Starting from the historical roots of Eastern European peripheralization and orientalization in the framework of the unfolding unequal division of labour in Europe since the 16 th century, the article is discussing concepts and trajectories of “catching-up” between 1867 and 2004. Both associative dependent integration with the world-economic cores and self-reliant national or regional integration can be observed. The evaluation departs from four historical moments, 1867 (Austro-Hungarian Compromise), 1918, 1945 and 1989 with an outlook on the new geopolitical dividing lines and alliances after the dissolution of Comecon 1991 and the beginning of EU-enlargement towards Eastern Europe in 2004. Strategies, successes and limits are discussed in front of the interest of Western powers and Russia as well as geopolitical moments and cycles, offering opportunities and restrictions for governments to improve their national economy and international performance. In spite of undeniable upgrading processes in some periods, catching-up has been overshadowed by four fundamental traps: the growth trap, the national trap, the debt trap and the militarization trap, occuring at specific moments of the process, allowing to identify cycles of catching-up. Finally, as catching-up has been reproducing dependency and peripheralization in new forms, the concept of catching-up has to be
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史视野中的东欧边缘化与追赶
摘要本文从16世纪以来欧洲不断发展的不平等劳动分工框架下东欧外围化和东方化的历史根源出发,探讨了1867年至2004年间“追赶”的概念和轨迹。与世界经济核心的关联依赖型一体化和自力更生的国家或区域一体化都可以观察到。本文从1867年(奥匈妥协)、1918年、1945年和1989年四个历史时刻出发,展望了1991年经济合作组织解体和2004年欧盟开始向东欧扩张后新的地缘政治分界线和联盟。在西方列强和俄罗斯的利益面前,在地缘政治的时刻和周期面前,讨论战略、成功和限制,为各国政府改善本国经济和国际表现提供机会和限制。尽管在某些时期出现了不可否认的升级过程,但追赶已被四个基本陷阱所掩盖:增长陷阱、国家陷阱、债务陷阱和军事化陷阱,这些陷阱在追赶过程的特定时刻出现,从而可以确定追赶的周期。最后,由于追赶一直在以新的形式再现依赖和外围化,追赶的概念必须是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Dois Tempos, Periférica Agenda Breve debate historiográfico sobre a evolução da filosofia da história: uma revisão de literatura Reforma agrária do Brasil e Peru da década de 60, sobre a ótica comparativa dos regimes militares The Rohingyas of Rakhine State: Social Evolution and History in the Light of Ethnic Nationalism Egypt: From Upper Egyptian Rural Petty Polities to Unitary State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1