Rethinking resilience: South Africa and self-reliance

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02533952.2022.2054145
Janeke Thumbran, R. Sacks
{"title":"Rethinking resilience: South Africa and self-reliance","authors":"Janeke Thumbran, R. Sacks","doi":"10.1080/02533952.2022.2054145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article, as the introduction to the Rethinking Resilience special issue, lays out the political and historical terrain of thinking with resilience, from South Africa, in 2021. It outlines the urgencies of the current moment, while delving into how the use of “resilience” has been adapted from scientific disciplines into various fields and broader popular culture. We discuss the two primary interlinking and overlapping themes of Rethinking Resilience: resilience as a historical and contemporary governance discourse with consequences and implications; and resilience as a concept tied to the Anthropocene along with the material properties of matter. As colonial and apartheid histories reveal, certain parts of the population have always been assumed to have more resilience than others, demonstrating how, in the present day, it is marginalised communities who are tasked with being resilient in order to survive. It is this assumption that the black gendered body has an innate natural facility to overcome all obstacles that also resonates with anthropocentric thinking. Through discussing these two overlapping themes, this special issue introduction shows how we bring together work that reveals the slippages in resilience, highlighting how the different uses and meanings of resilience can be productive","PeriodicalId":51765,"journal":{"name":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"2 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2022.2054145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article, as the introduction to the Rethinking Resilience special issue, lays out the political and historical terrain of thinking with resilience, from South Africa, in 2021. It outlines the urgencies of the current moment, while delving into how the use of “resilience” has been adapted from scientific disciplines into various fields and broader popular culture. We discuss the two primary interlinking and overlapping themes of Rethinking Resilience: resilience as a historical and contemporary governance discourse with consequences and implications; and resilience as a concept tied to the Anthropocene along with the material properties of matter. As colonial and apartheid histories reveal, certain parts of the population have always been assumed to have more resilience than others, demonstrating how, in the present day, it is marginalised communities who are tasked with being resilient in order to survive. It is this assumption that the black gendered body has an innate natural facility to overcome all obstacles that also resonates with anthropocentric thinking. Through discussing these two overlapping themes, this special issue introduction shows how we bring together work that reveals the slippages in resilience, highlighting how the different uses and meanings of resilience can be productive
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考韧性:南非与自力更生
摘要本文作为《反思韧性》特刊的引言,阐述了2021年南非韧性思维的政治和历史背景。它概述了当前的紧迫性,同时深入探讨了“韧性”的使用是如何从科学学科适应到各个领域和更广泛的流行文化的。我们讨论了《重新思考韧性》的两个主要相互关联和重叠的主题:韧性作为一种具有后果和含义的历史和当代治理话语;弹性是一个与人类世以及物质的材料特性相关的概念。正如殖民地和种族隔离历史所揭示的那样,人们一直认为某些群体比其他群体更有韧性,这表明在当今社会,边缘化社区的任务是保持韧性以生存。正是这种假设,即黑人性别化的身体具有克服所有障碍的天生能力,这也与人类中心主义思维产生了共鸣。通过讨论这两个重叠的主题,本期特刊介绍展示了我们如何将揭示弹性失误的工作结合在一起,强调弹性的不同用途和含义如何产生成效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Dynamics is the journal of the Centre for African Studies at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. It has been published since 1975, and is committed to advancing interdisciplinary academic research, fostering debate and addressing current issues pertaining to the African continent. Articles cover the full range of humanities and social sciences including anthropology, archaeology, economics, education, history, literary and language studies, music, politics, psychology and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Ke mosali oa Mosotho : reflecting on indigenous conceptions of womanhood in Lesotho Strategic protest and the negotiation of legibility in Cape Town: a case study of Reclaim the City Rituals, family connections, and BoRakgadi Intellectual decolonisation and the danger of epistemic closure: the need for a critical decolonial theory Why recognition? Deciphering justice claims in 2016 Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1