Intellectual capital as a longitudinal predictor of company performance in a developing economy

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1696
Vladimir Dzenopoljac, Piotr Kwiatek, Aleksandra Dzenopoljac, Nick Bontis
{"title":"Intellectual capital as a longitudinal predictor of company performance in a developing economy","authors":"Vladimir Dzenopoljac,&nbsp;Piotr Kwiatek,&nbsp;Aleksandra Dzenopoljac,&nbsp;Nick Bontis","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assesses whether intellectual capital (IC), measured using the Value-Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC), can predict the financial and market performance of listed companies in a developing economy. Panel data from all 174 companies listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange were analyzed. Four company performance measures were investigated: return on assets, return on equity, market/book value, and market capitalization. Eight competitive longitudinal models were evaluated using SEM–PLS, as well as the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year lags. VAIC possesses significant predictive power on company performance, but only on return on assets and return on equity, with a stronger predictive power for the 2-year lag. When analyzing the 3-year lag, the model fit decreases significantly. This suggests that VAIC has no significant predictive power on analyzed market performance measures. Most extant literature on IC does not explicitly quantify its lagged effect and predictive power on company performance. Additionally, existing research focuses less on developing economies. The research was conducted in a developing economy with a relatively young and inefficient financial market. This rationalizes the findings in which IC cannot predict market performance. Additionally, the time span considered is only 5 years from the 21 years analyzed. Useful managerial insights on the evident lagged effect and predictive power of IC in a developing economy are provided. Quantifying the effect size adds value to the further understanding of IC's nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"53-69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study assesses whether intellectual capital (IC), measured using the Value-Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC), can predict the financial and market performance of listed companies in a developing economy. Panel data from all 174 companies listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange were analyzed. Four company performance measures were investigated: return on assets, return on equity, market/book value, and market capitalization. Eight competitive longitudinal models were evaluated using SEM–PLS, as well as the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year lags. VAIC possesses significant predictive power on company performance, but only on return on assets and return on equity, with a stronger predictive power for the 2-year lag. When analyzing the 3-year lag, the model fit decreases significantly. This suggests that VAIC has no significant predictive power on analyzed market performance measures. Most extant literature on IC does not explicitly quantify its lagged effect and predictive power on company performance. Additionally, existing research focuses less on developing economies. The research was conducted in a developing economy with a relatively young and inefficient financial market. This rationalizes the findings in which IC cannot predict market performance. Additionally, the time span considered is only 5 years from the 21 years analyzed. Useful managerial insights on the evident lagged effect and predictive power of IC in a developing economy are provided. Quantifying the effect size adds value to the further understanding of IC's nature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中经济体中智力资本对公司绩效的纵向预测
本研究以增值智力系数(value - value intellectual Coefficient, VAIC)衡量智力资本(IC)能否预测发展中经济体上市公司的财务和市场表现。对科威特证券交易所所有174家上市公司的面板数据进行了分析。调查了四项公司绩效指标:资产收益率、股本收益率、市场/账面价值和市值。使用SEM-PLS评估了8个竞争性纵向模型,以及1年,2年和3年滞后。VAIC对公司业绩具有显著的预测能力,但仅对资产收益率和净资产收益率具有显著的预测能力,对滞后2年的预测能力更强。当分析3年滞后时,模型拟合显著下降。这表明VAIC对分析的市场绩效指标没有显著的预测能力。大多数关于集成电路的现有文献没有明确量化其对公司绩效的滞后效应和预测能力。此外,现有的研究较少关注发展中经济体。这项研究是在一个金融市场相对年轻和低效的发展中经济体进行的。这使IC无法预测市场表现的发现合理化。此外,所考虑的时间跨度仅为21年分析中的5年。对发展中经济体中集成电路的明显滞后效应和预测能力提供了有用的管理见解。量化效应大小有助于进一步了解IC的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Unethical favouritism and KH: The mediating role of organisational injustice The next event will be held with more quality: Identifying and prioritizing barriers to knowledge management in sports events Context-driven implementation strategies: Exploring three approaches to implement a lean capability framework within a global production company Toward effective KMS measurement: Usage statistics vs. perceived value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1