The potential of metabarcoding plant components of Malaise trap samples to enhance knowledge of plant-insect interactions

S. Swenson, L. Eichler, Thomas Hörren, Andreas Kolter, S. Köthe, G. Lehmann, G. Meinel, R. Mühlethaler, M. Sorg, B. Gemeinholzer
{"title":"The potential of metabarcoding plant components of Malaise trap samples to enhance knowledge of plant-insect interactions","authors":"S. Swenson, L. Eichler, Thomas Hörren, Andreas Kolter, S. Köthe, G. Lehmann, G. Meinel, R. Mühlethaler, M. Sorg, B. Gemeinholzer","doi":"10.3897/mbmg.6.85213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The worldwide rapid declines in insect and plant abundance and diversity that have occurred in the past decades have gained public attention and demand for political actions to counteract these declines are growing. Rapid large-scale biomonitoring can aid in observing these changes and provide information for decisions for land management and species protection. Malaise traps have long been used for insect sampling and when insects are captured in these traps, they carry traces of plants they have visited on the body surface or as digested food material in the gut contents. Metabarcoding offers a promising method for identifying these plant traces, providing insight into the plants with which insects are directly interacting at a given time. To test the efficacy of DNA metabarcoding with these sample types, 79 samples from 21 sites across Germany were analysed with the ITS2 barcode. This study, to our knowledge, is the first examination of metabarcoding plant DNA traces from Malaise trap samples. Here, we report on the feasibility of sequencing these sample types, analysis of the resulting taxa, the usage of cultivated plants by insects near nature conservancy areas and the detection of rare and neophyte species. Due to the frequency of contamination and false positive reads, isolation and PCR negative controls should be used in every reaction. Metabarcoding has advantages in efficiency and resolution over microscopic identification of pollen and is the only possible identification method for the other plant traces from Malaise traps and could provide a broad utility for future studies of plant-insect interactions.","PeriodicalId":18374,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.6.85213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The worldwide rapid declines in insect and plant abundance and diversity that have occurred in the past decades have gained public attention and demand for political actions to counteract these declines are growing. Rapid large-scale biomonitoring can aid in observing these changes and provide information for decisions for land management and species protection. Malaise traps have long been used for insect sampling and when insects are captured in these traps, they carry traces of plants they have visited on the body surface or as digested food material in the gut contents. Metabarcoding offers a promising method for identifying these plant traces, providing insight into the plants with which insects are directly interacting at a given time. To test the efficacy of DNA metabarcoding with these sample types, 79 samples from 21 sites across Germany were analysed with the ITS2 barcode. This study, to our knowledge, is the first examination of metabarcoding plant DNA traces from Malaise trap samples. Here, we report on the feasibility of sequencing these sample types, analysis of the resulting taxa, the usage of cultivated plants by insects near nature conservancy areas and the detection of rare and neophyte species. Due to the frequency of contamination and false positive reads, isolation and PCR negative controls should be used in every reaction. Metabarcoding has advantages in efficiency and resolution over microscopic identification of pollen and is the only possible identification method for the other plant traces from Malaise traps and could provide a broad utility for future studies of plant-insect interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The对虫病诱捕器样本植物成分进行元条形码编码以增强对植物-昆虫相互作用的认识的潜力
过去几十年来,世界范围内昆虫和植物丰度和多样性的迅速下降引起了公众的关注,人们越来越需要采取政治行动来应对这些下降。快速大规模的生物监测可以帮助观察这些变化,并为土地管理和物种保护的决策提供信息。Malaise诱捕器长期以来一直被用于昆虫采样,当昆虫在这些诱捕器中被捕获时,它们会在体表携带它们访问过的植物痕迹,或在肠道内容物中作为消化的食物物质。代谢条形码为识别这些植物痕迹提供了一种很有前途的方法,可以深入了解昆虫在特定时间直接与之相互作用的植物。为了测试这些样本类型的DNA代谢条形码的有效性,用ITS2条形码分析了来自德国21个地点的79个样本。据我们所知,这项研究是首次对Malaise陷阱样品中的代谢编码植物DNA痕迹进行检查。在这里,我们报告了对这些样本类型进行测序的可行性,对由此产生的分类群的分析,自然保护区附近昆虫对栽培植物的使用,以及稀有和新植物物种的检测。由于污染和假阳性读数的频率,应在每个反应中使用隔离和PCR阴性对照。与花粉的微观鉴定相比,代谢编码在效率和分辨率方面具有优势,是Malaise陷阱中其他植物痕迹的唯一可能的鉴定方法,并可能为未来的植物-昆虫相互作用研究提供广泛的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Simple approaches for evaluation of OTU quality based on dissimilarity arrays Assessing the diversity of nematodes in the Store Mosse National Park (Sweden) using metabarcoding Halamphora taxa in Hungarian soda pans and shallow soda lakes detected via metabarcoding and microscopic analyses Insights into the ecological impact of trout introduction in an oligotrophic lake using sedimentary environmental DNA Exploring benthic diatom diversity in the West Antarctic Peninsula: insights from a morphological and molecular approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1