Application of Conditional Deep Generative Networks (CGAN) in empirical bayes estimation of road crash risk and identifying crash hotspots

Mohammad Zarei, Bruce Hellinga, Pedram Izadpanah
{"title":"Application of Conditional Deep Generative Networks (CGAN) in empirical bayes estimation of road crash risk and identifying crash hotspots","authors":"Mohammad Zarei,&nbsp;Bruce Hellinga,&nbsp;Pedram Izadpanah","doi":"10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The conditional generative adversarial network (CGAN) is used in this paper for empirical Bayes (EB) analysis of road crash hotspots. EB is a well-known method for estimating the expected crash frequency of sites (e.g. road segments, intersections) and then prioritising these sites to identify a subset of high priority sites (e.g. hotspots) for additional safety audits/improvements. In contrast to the conventional EB approach, which employs a statistical model such as the negative binomial model (NB-EB) to model crash frequency data, the recently developed CGAN-EB approach uses a conditional generative adversarial network, a form of deep neural network, that can model any form of distributions of the crash frequency data. Previous research has shown that the CGAN-EB performs as well as or better than NB-EB, however that work considered only a small range of crash data characteristics and did not examine the spatial and temporal transferability. In this paper a series of simulation experiments are devised and carried out to assess the CGAN-EB performance across a wide range of conditions and compares it to the NB-EB. The simulation results show that CGAN-EB performs as well as NB-EB when conditions favor the NB-EB model (i.e. data conform to the assumptions of the NB model) and outperforms NB-EB in experiments reflecting conditions frequently encountered in practice (i.e. low sample mean crash rates, and when crash frequency does not follow a log-linear relationship with covariates). Also, temporal and spatial transferability of both approaches were evaluated using field data and both CGAN-EB and NB-EB approaches were found to have similar performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043023000084/pdfft?md5=2465256101f2d75ef4563dbd4d2c3a56&pid=1-s2.0-S2046043023000084-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043023000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conditional generative adversarial network (CGAN) is used in this paper for empirical Bayes (EB) analysis of road crash hotspots. EB is a well-known method for estimating the expected crash frequency of sites (e.g. road segments, intersections) and then prioritising these sites to identify a subset of high priority sites (e.g. hotspots) for additional safety audits/improvements. In contrast to the conventional EB approach, which employs a statistical model such as the negative binomial model (NB-EB) to model crash frequency data, the recently developed CGAN-EB approach uses a conditional generative adversarial network, a form of deep neural network, that can model any form of distributions of the crash frequency data. Previous research has shown that the CGAN-EB performs as well as or better than NB-EB, however that work considered only a small range of crash data characteristics and did not examine the spatial and temporal transferability. In this paper a series of simulation experiments are devised and carried out to assess the CGAN-EB performance across a wide range of conditions and compares it to the NB-EB. The simulation results show that CGAN-EB performs as well as NB-EB when conditions favor the NB-EB model (i.e. data conform to the assumptions of the NB model) and outperforms NB-EB in experiments reflecting conditions frequently encountered in practice (i.e. low sample mean crash rates, and when crash frequency does not follow a log-linear relationship with covariates). Also, temporal and spatial transferability of both approaches were evaluated using field data and both CGAN-EB and NB-EB approaches were found to have similar performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
条件深度生成网络在道路碰撞风险经验贝叶斯估计和碰撞热点识别中的应用
本文使用条件生成对抗网络(CGAN)对道路碰撞热点进行经验贝叶斯(EB)分析。EB 是一种众所周知的方法,用于估算现场(如路段、交叉路口)的预期碰撞频率,然后对这些现场进行优先排序,以确定需要进行额外安全审核/改进的高优先级现场(如热点)子集。传统的 EB 方法采用负二项模型(NB-EB)等统计模型对碰撞频率数据进行建模,与之不同的是,最近开发的 CGAN-EB 方法采用条件生成对抗网络(一种深度神经网络),该网络可对碰撞频率数据的任何分布形式进行建模。之前的研究表明,CGAN-EB 的性能与 NB-EB 不相上下,甚至更好,但这些研究只考虑了很小范围的碰撞数据特征,并没有考察空间和时间上的可转移性。本文设计并进行了一系列模拟实验,以评估 CGAN-EB 在各种条件下的性能,并将其与 NB-EB 进行比较。模拟结果表明,在有利于 NB-EB 模型的条件下(即数据符合 NB 模型的假设条件),CGAN-EB 的性能与 NB-EB 不相上下,而在反映实践中经常遇到的条件的实验中(即低样本平均碰撞率,以及碰撞频率与协变量不呈对数线性关系时),CGAN-EB 的性能优于 NB-EB。此外,还利用现场数据对这两种方法的时空可转移性进行了评估,结果发现 CGAN-EB 和 NB-EB 方法具有相似的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
88 days
期刊最新文献
An exploration of the preferences and mode choice behavior between autonomous demand-responsive transit and traditional buses Connected vehicle enabled hierarchical anomaly behavior management system for city-level networks Operational measures to maintaining physical distancing at railway stations Investigating the dynamics of speed and acceleration at merging and diverging sections using UAV based trajectory data Evaluating the impacts of major transportation disruptions – San Francisco Bay Area case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1