{"title":"Celebrating the IADR’s Women Pioneers: Pathways for a New Century of Success","authors":"R. N. D'Souza, E. Ioannidou, T. Tiwari","doi":"10.1177/0022034519880489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this celebratory time for the Journal of Dental Research and the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), it is fitting to dedicate a special theme issue that honors the women of the IADR whose research and leadership efforts have blazed trails for others to follow. Timely and significant is the need to also assess the current status of women in the academic dental research workforce to provide the framework upon which the IADR and its stakeholder groups can build future programs and initiatives for the new century ahead. New analyses and commentaries on the gender gap, such as those reflected in The Lancet issue on advancing women in science, medicine, and global health, highlight the universal injustices faced by women in all biomedicine disciplines (Bachelet 2019). In the United States, recent positions taken by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018), the National Science Foundation (2018), and the National Institutes of Health (Collins et al. 2019) have led to an overhauling of policies and procedures that have so far proven to be ineffective. Such changes are directed toward achieving safe environments for women professionals. Additional policies at research meetings will also ensure that the “manel” tradition is broken, thus creating level playing fields where scientists of all backgrounds are evaluated fairly for speaking opportunities (Collins 2019). The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, in marking its 2018 centennial celebration, committed to increasing the number of women in all its leadership forums by 2030 while striving to increase the percentage of women surgeons from 8% to 30% in the next century (Lee et al. 2019). The significant and pioneering contributions of women dental professionals in the United Kingdom over 100 years are highlighted by Janine Brooks (2019). While several of the issues identified are translatable to women in other specialized fields, reports on the status of women in academic dental research are limited in the literature. Such gaps in knowledge should be addressed, as the greater number of women entering the dental profession and the biomedical research workforce naturally creates more robust pipelines for dental, oral, and craniofacial research. The dental and craniofacial research workforce has to systematically examine not only demographics but also policies and practices to create an equitable, fair, and civil workplace. The lack of inclusive policies has significant effects on the way that science is conducted, with negative impacts on health care outcomes (Garrett 2018; Zarkowski 2018). In the opening article of this issue, Tiwari and colleagues (2019) assess growth trajectories in gender diversity and inclusion, as reported for several countries that are represented in the global membership of the IADR. As was best possible, data were sought about historic trends as related to the number of women entering dental schools, as this cohort signifies the largest pipeline for dental academic researchers. Those pursuing academic careers and those involved as leaders in decisionmaking forums were included, with the focus remaining on the professional cohort of women who function in the dental academic environment. The second article, by Ioannidou et al. (2019), discusses critical issues that affect gender equity in academic environments—namely, pipelines, economic equality, workplace harassment, gender bias in scholarly productivity, and work-life balance. Also discussed are IADR-led initiatives to advance the status and career advancement of women dental academic researchers. Li and colleagues (2019) analyze further the number of women in leadership roles within North American dental schools as well as in major professional organizations and prominent dental journals. They conclude that despite the steady increase in female enrollment in dental schools, women are underrepresented in leadership and administrative roles. Next, D’Silva et al. (2019) sought to analyze data on the IADR’s Distinguished Scientist Award winners who were recognized for distinctive contributions in 17 disciplines (established within a 60-year period), as this serves as a positive indicator of how women dental researchers are recognized by their peers. This study demonstrates for the first time that the overall pool of awardees parallels the diversity of the IADR’s global community. Recommendations were made to correct the discrepancies noted between the total number of women awardees and the percentage of female members of the IADR. 880489 ADRXXX10.1177/0022034519880489Advances in Dental ResearchCelebrating the IADR’s Women Pioneers research-article2019","PeriodicalId":7300,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dental Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"58 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022034519880489","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519880489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In this celebratory time for the Journal of Dental Research and the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), it is fitting to dedicate a special theme issue that honors the women of the IADR whose research and leadership efforts have blazed trails for others to follow. Timely and significant is the need to also assess the current status of women in the academic dental research workforce to provide the framework upon which the IADR and its stakeholder groups can build future programs and initiatives for the new century ahead. New analyses and commentaries on the gender gap, such as those reflected in The Lancet issue on advancing women in science, medicine, and global health, highlight the universal injustices faced by women in all biomedicine disciplines (Bachelet 2019). In the United States, recent positions taken by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018), the National Science Foundation (2018), and the National Institutes of Health (Collins et al. 2019) have led to an overhauling of policies and procedures that have so far proven to be ineffective. Such changes are directed toward achieving safe environments for women professionals. Additional policies at research meetings will also ensure that the “manel” tradition is broken, thus creating level playing fields where scientists of all backgrounds are evaluated fairly for speaking opportunities (Collins 2019). The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, in marking its 2018 centennial celebration, committed to increasing the number of women in all its leadership forums by 2030 while striving to increase the percentage of women surgeons from 8% to 30% in the next century (Lee et al. 2019). The significant and pioneering contributions of women dental professionals in the United Kingdom over 100 years are highlighted by Janine Brooks (2019). While several of the issues identified are translatable to women in other specialized fields, reports on the status of women in academic dental research are limited in the literature. Such gaps in knowledge should be addressed, as the greater number of women entering the dental profession and the biomedical research workforce naturally creates more robust pipelines for dental, oral, and craniofacial research. The dental and craniofacial research workforce has to systematically examine not only demographics but also policies and practices to create an equitable, fair, and civil workplace. The lack of inclusive policies has significant effects on the way that science is conducted, with negative impacts on health care outcomes (Garrett 2018; Zarkowski 2018). In the opening article of this issue, Tiwari and colleagues (2019) assess growth trajectories in gender diversity and inclusion, as reported for several countries that are represented in the global membership of the IADR. As was best possible, data were sought about historic trends as related to the number of women entering dental schools, as this cohort signifies the largest pipeline for dental academic researchers. Those pursuing academic careers and those involved as leaders in decisionmaking forums were included, with the focus remaining on the professional cohort of women who function in the dental academic environment. The second article, by Ioannidou et al. (2019), discusses critical issues that affect gender equity in academic environments—namely, pipelines, economic equality, workplace harassment, gender bias in scholarly productivity, and work-life balance. Also discussed are IADR-led initiatives to advance the status and career advancement of women dental academic researchers. Li and colleagues (2019) analyze further the number of women in leadership roles within North American dental schools as well as in major professional organizations and prominent dental journals. They conclude that despite the steady increase in female enrollment in dental schools, women are underrepresented in leadership and administrative roles. Next, D’Silva et al. (2019) sought to analyze data on the IADR’s Distinguished Scientist Award winners who were recognized for distinctive contributions in 17 disciplines (established within a 60-year period), as this serves as a positive indicator of how women dental researchers are recognized by their peers. This study demonstrates for the first time that the overall pool of awardees parallels the diversity of the IADR’s global community. Recommendations were made to correct the discrepancies noted between the total number of women awardees and the percentage of female members of the IADR. 880489 ADRXXX10.1177/0022034519880489Advances in Dental ResearchCelebrating the IADR’s Women Pioneers research-article2019
在这个《牙科研究杂志》和国际牙科研究协会(IADR)庆祝的时刻,我们有必要专门制作一期主题特刊,向IADR的女性致敬,她们的研究和领导努力为其他人开辟了道路。还需要及时和重要地评估妇女在牙科学术研究队伍中的现状,以便为IADR及其利益相关团体提供框架,以便为未来的新世纪制定未来的计划和倡议。关于性别差距的新分析和评论,例如《柳叶刀》杂志关于促进妇女在科学、医学和全球卫生领域发展的分析和评论,强调了妇女在所有生物医学学科中普遍面临的不公正现象(巴切莱特2019年)。在美国,美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(2018年)、美国国家科学基金会(2018年)和美国国立卫生研究院(Collins et al. 2019年)最近采取的立场导致了迄今为止被证明无效的政策和程序的彻底改革。这些变化的目的是为妇女专业人员创造安全的环境。研究会议上的其他政策也将确保打破“专家”传统,从而创造公平的竞争环境,让所有背景的科学家都能得到公平的评估,以获得发言机会(Collins 2019)。美国口腔颌面外科医生协会(American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)在2018年的百年庆典上承诺,到2030年,在其所有领导论坛上增加女性人数,同时努力在下个世纪将女性外科医生的比例从8%提高到30% (Lee et al. 2019)。Janine Brooks(2019)强调了100多年来英国女性牙科专业人员的重要和开创性贡献。虽然所确定的一些问题可以翻译给其他专业领域的妇女,但关于妇女在牙科学术研究中的地位的报告在文献中是有限的。这些知识上的差距应该得到解决,因为越来越多的女性进入牙科专业和生物医学研究队伍,自然会为牙科、口腔和颅面研究创造更强大的渠道。牙科和颅面研究人员不仅要系统地检查人口统计数据,还要系统地检查政策和实践,以创造一个公平、公正和文明的工作场所。缺乏包容性政策对科学开展方式产生重大影响,对医疗保健结果产生负面影响(Garrett 2018;Zarkowski 2018)。在本期的开篇文章中,蒂瓦里及其同事(2019年)评估了性别多样性和包容性的增长轨迹,并报告了作为IADR全球成员的几个国家的情况。作为最好的可能,数据寻求有关历史趋势的妇女人数进入牙科学校,因为这一队列标志着牙科学术研究人员的最大管道。那些追求学术事业和参与决策论坛的领导者也包括在内,重点仍然是在牙科学术环境中发挥作用的专业女性群体。第二篇文章由Ioannidou等人(2019)撰写,讨论了影响学术环境中性别平等的关键问题,即管道、经济平等、工作场所骚扰、学术生产力中的性别偏见以及工作与生活的平衡。还讨论了iadr领导的倡议,以提高妇女牙科学术研究人员的地位和职业发展。李和同事(2019)进一步分析了北美牙科学校以及主要专业组织和著名牙科期刊中担任领导职务的女性人数。他们得出的结论是,尽管牙科学校的女性入学率稳步上升,但女性在领导和管理职位上的代表性不足。接下来,D 'Silva等人(2019年)试图分析关于IADR杰出科学家奖获奖者的数据,这些获奖者因在17个学科(60年内建立)的独特贡献而获得认可,因为这是女性牙科研究人员如何被同行认可的积极指标。这项研究首次表明,获奖者的总体数量与IADR全球社区的多样性相当。提出了一些建议,以纠正妇女获奖者总数与国际发展计划署女性成员百分比之间的差异。880489 adrxxx10 .1177/0022034519880489牙科研究进展庆祝IADR的女性先驱研究文章2019