Evaluation of Knowledge, Practice and Adherence of General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists to Asthma Guidelines in Malaysia

A. Sha’aban, Ahmed Abdel Mohamed, Fatimatuzzahra’ Abd Aziz, B. Ibrahim
{"title":"Evaluation of Knowledge, Practice and Adherence of General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists to Asthma Guidelines in Malaysia","authors":"A. Sha’aban, Ahmed Abdel Mohamed, Fatimatuzzahra’ Abd Aziz, B. Ibrahim","doi":"10.21315/mjps2022.20.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asthma is a heterogeneous disease that inflames and narrows the airways. It is identified with respiratory symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough. It has also been established that adherence to evidence-based guidelines may raise asthma control to optimal levels in both diagnosis and medical intervention. The objectives are to assess the knowledge, practice and adherence to asthma-management guidelines of general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Pulau Pinang using a validated self-administered questionnaire. The knowledge, practice and adherence to asthmamanagement guidelines of GPs and CPs were captured using a 30-item questionnaire that prompted their responses using a mixture of closed-ended and Likert scale techniques. The questionnaires, together with a self-addressed stamped envelope for return, were mailed to 236 CPs and 300 GPs. The knowledge of both CPs and GPs on asthma was slightly above average, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (65.9% for CPs and 67.2% for GPs, p = 0.933). Overall, GPs have better practice than CPs, with a mean score of 4 or higher for most practice questions. GPs have a significantly higher tendency to follow the asthma guidelines (71.9%), whereas less than half of the CPs (46.4%) adhere to them. Only 40.6% of GPs and 3.5% of CPs mentioned the name of the guidelines they followed. Our findings show that although CPs and GPs have similar levels of knowledge, GPs have better practice and adherence to guidelines than CPs.","PeriodicalId":53358,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjps2022.20.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease that inflames and narrows the airways. It is identified with respiratory symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough. It has also been established that adherence to evidence-based guidelines may raise asthma control to optimal levels in both diagnosis and medical intervention. The objectives are to assess the knowledge, practice and adherence to asthma-management guidelines of general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Pulau Pinang using a validated self-administered questionnaire. The knowledge, practice and adherence to asthmamanagement guidelines of GPs and CPs were captured using a 30-item questionnaire that prompted their responses using a mixture of closed-ended and Likert scale techniques. The questionnaires, together with a self-addressed stamped envelope for return, were mailed to 236 CPs and 300 GPs. The knowledge of both CPs and GPs on asthma was slightly above average, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (65.9% for CPs and 67.2% for GPs, p = 0.933). Overall, GPs have better practice than CPs, with a mean score of 4 or higher for most practice questions. GPs have a significantly higher tendency to follow the asthma guidelines (71.9%), whereas less than half of the CPs (46.4%) adhere to them. Only 40.6% of GPs and 3.5% of CPs mentioned the name of the guidelines they followed. Our findings show that although CPs and GPs have similar levels of knowledge, GPs have better practice and adherence to guidelines than CPs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚全科医生和社区药剂师对哮喘指南的知识、实践和依从性评估
哮喘是一种异质性疾病,会使呼吸道发炎和变窄。它被确认为呼吸系统症状,如喘息、呼吸急促、胸闷和咳嗽。此外,根据循证指南可以将哮喘控制提高到诊断和医疗干预的最佳水平。目的是评估马来西亚槟城全科医生和社区药剂师的哮喘管理指南的知识、实践和遵守情况。在皮昂岛进行了一项横断面研究,使用了一份经过验证的自填问卷。全科医生和CPs的哮喘管理指南的知识、实践和遵守情况使用30项问卷进行记录,该问卷使用封闭式和Likert量表技术进行提示。调查问卷连同一个注明地址的盖章信封一起邮寄给236名CP和300名GP。CP和全科医生对哮喘的了解略高于平均水平,两组之间没有显著差异(CP为65.9%,全科医生为67.2%,p=0.933)。总体而言,全科医师的实践比CP更好,大多数实践问题的平均得分为4分或更高。全科医生遵循哮喘指南的倾向明显更高(71.9%),而只有不到一半的全科医生(46.4%)遵守这些指南。只有40.6%的全科医生和3.5%的CP提到了他们遵循的指南的名称。我们的研究结果表明,尽管CP和全科医生的知识水平相似,但全科医生比CP有更好的实践和遵守指南的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
DELIVERY OF TRAINING IN HIV/AIDS SERVICES AMONG COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS IN OYO STATE, NIGERIA: AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY GLYCAEMIC CONTROL AND HYPOGLYCAEMIA AMONG PATIENTS WITH DIABETES IN A PHARMACIST-MANAGED INSULIN TITRATION PROGRAMME SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PHARMACIST-LED HOME MEDICATION REVIEWS TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE TO ANTIDIABETIC MEDICATIONS AMONG ADULT TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS AN OVERVIEW ON CUBOSOMES AS REMARKABLE NANOCARRIER FOR DRUG DELIVERY A Nationwide Survey on Malaysian Hospital Physicians’ Practices of Intravenous Potassium Chloride Supplementation and Opinions on Premixed Formulation in the Treatment of Hypokalaemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1