Villains, Ghosts, and Roses, or, How to Speak with the Dead

IF 0.5 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Open Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI:10.1515/culture-2019-0002
S. Huber
{"title":"Villains, Ghosts, and Roses, or, How to Speak with the Dead","authors":"S. Huber","doi":"10.1515/culture-2019-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract If narratives that uphold secular humanism have led to an “unparalleled catastrophe” as Sylvia Wynter notes in an interview with Katherine McKittrick, then it is time to unwrite them. In this essay, I examine the dead as a category that exceeds metaphysical classifications of subject and object and provides alternate possibilities of communication and hybridity. To do so, I call on work by Claire Colebrook, Jacques Derrida, John Durham Peters, Eve Tuck, and Unica Zürn, among others, with the cultural work and words of Sylvia Wynter as a guide and galvanising force. Here, I repopulate the life/death seam with gorgons, witches, fates, and revenge stories. If ghosts are seen simply as other beings, albeit taboo ones like bacteria, or require alternate cultural narratives like villains, or exist both in the symbolic sphere of the mystical and the so-called natural world like roses, what kinds of methodologies can be opened? What do the dead have to say and how do we listen?","PeriodicalId":41385,"journal":{"name":"Open Cultural Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"15 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/culture-2019-0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2019-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract If narratives that uphold secular humanism have led to an “unparalleled catastrophe” as Sylvia Wynter notes in an interview with Katherine McKittrick, then it is time to unwrite them. In this essay, I examine the dead as a category that exceeds metaphysical classifications of subject and object and provides alternate possibilities of communication and hybridity. To do so, I call on work by Claire Colebrook, Jacques Derrida, John Durham Peters, Eve Tuck, and Unica Zürn, among others, with the cultural work and words of Sylvia Wynter as a guide and galvanising force. Here, I repopulate the life/death seam with gorgons, witches, fates, and revenge stories. If ghosts are seen simply as other beings, albeit taboo ones like bacteria, or require alternate cultural narratives like villains, or exist both in the symbolic sphere of the mystical and the so-called natural world like roses, what kinds of methodologies can be opened? What do the dead have to say and how do we listen?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恶棍、鬼魂和玫瑰,或者,如何与死者交谈
摘要如果像Sylvia Wynter在接受Katherine McKittrick采访时指出的那样,维护世俗人道主义的叙事导致了一场“无与伦比的灾难”,那么是时候解开它们了。在这篇文章中,我将死者视为一个超越了形而上学的主体和客体分类的范畴,并提供了交流和混合的替代可能性。为此,我呼吁克莱尔·科尔布鲁克、雅克·德里达、约翰·达勒姆-彼得斯、伊芙·塔克和尤妮卡·祖恩等的作品,以西尔维娅·温特的文化作品和文字为指导和激励力量。在这里,我用蛇发女怪、女巫、命运和复仇故事重新填充了生与死的缝隙。如果鬼魂被简单地视为其他生物,尽管像细菌一样是禁忌生物,或者像恶棍一样需要交替的文化叙事,或者像玫瑰一样既存在于神秘世界的象征领域,又存在于所谓的自然世界,那么可以打开什么样的方法论?死者要说什么?我们如何倾听?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Cultural Studies
Open Cultural Studies CULTURAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Youth and Intergenerational Transmission of Cultural Intelligence in Latvia, Spain and Turkey Social Connection when Physically Isolated: Family Experiences in Using Video Calls How I Met Your Fans: A Comparative Textual Analysis of How I Met Your Mother and Its Reboots A Russian Aristocrat in the Principality of Liechtenstein: Life Trajectories, Material Culture, and Language Aspects of Visual Content Covered in the Audio Description of Arabic Series: A Corpus-assisted Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1