Walking the Creativity Tightrope: Teaching students to be appropriately radical

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Tercio Creciente Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.17561/rtc.extra6.6526
M. Wiebe
{"title":"Walking the Creativity Tightrope: Teaching students to be appropriately radical","authors":"M. Wiebe","doi":"10.17561/rtc.extra6.6526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creativity has a significant place in visual arts education (Bastos & Zimmerman, 2015; Katz-Buonincontro, 2018; Kinsella, 2018; Sawyer, 2017; Stone, 2015; Ulger, 2019; Veon, 2014) but an understanding of creativity leads to the recognition that for something to be deemed creative, it must be both novel and appropriate in context (Amabile, 2018; Cropley, 2016; Goetz Zwirn & Vande Zande, 2015; Kaufman & Baer, 2012; Plucker, 2018). While the ‘in context’ addition to the concept of appropriate, creates more space for visual artists, the constraints of appropriateness remain. For a visual arts and design instructor, this creates tension. How do I encourage students to be creative and push boundaries, yet also teach them to be mindful of the constraints? \n            This paper discusses observations in undergraduate design education studio classes wherein students learn to use process and thumbnail sketches to push their concepts beyond predictable and into the radical or novel realm. A modified design thinking process provides the structure that allows students to feel confident about exploring ideas. Ongoing feedback from peers and instructor serves to both push and reign in ideas when revisions are valuable. The process requires diligence and practice. It also requires that students work to break free from either/or thinking and view their work on a continuum. \n            Reflecting on relevant methods for encouraging students to accept the value of novel ideas that also acknowledge the viewer is worthwhile. Encouraging students to recognize that creativity is enhanced through process while also engendering an understanding of the nature of creativity is valuable and can lead to the generation of radical ideas that have merit due not only to their novelty but also to their ‘appropriateness.’","PeriodicalId":40673,"journal":{"name":"Tercio Creciente","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tercio Creciente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/rtc.extra6.6526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creativity has a significant place in visual arts education (Bastos & Zimmerman, 2015; Katz-Buonincontro, 2018; Kinsella, 2018; Sawyer, 2017; Stone, 2015; Ulger, 2019; Veon, 2014) but an understanding of creativity leads to the recognition that for something to be deemed creative, it must be both novel and appropriate in context (Amabile, 2018; Cropley, 2016; Goetz Zwirn & Vande Zande, 2015; Kaufman & Baer, 2012; Plucker, 2018). While the ‘in context’ addition to the concept of appropriate, creates more space for visual artists, the constraints of appropriateness remain. For a visual arts and design instructor, this creates tension. How do I encourage students to be creative and push boundaries, yet also teach them to be mindful of the constraints?             This paper discusses observations in undergraduate design education studio classes wherein students learn to use process and thumbnail sketches to push their concepts beyond predictable and into the radical or novel realm. A modified design thinking process provides the structure that allows students to feel confident about exploring ideas. Ongoing feedback from peers and instructor serves to both push and reign in ideas when revisions are valuable. The process requires diligence and practice. It also requires that students work to break free from either/or thinking and view their work on a continuum.             Reflecting on relevant methods for encouraging students to accept the value of novel ideas that also acknowledge the viewer is worthwhile. Encouraging students to recognize that creativity is enhanced through process while also engendering an understanding of the nature of creativity is valuable and can lead to the generation of radical ideas that have merit due not only to their novelty but also to their ‘appropriateness.’
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走创造力的钢丝:教学生适度激进
创造力在视觉艺术教育中占有重要地位(Bastos&Zimmerman,2015;Katz-Buonincontro,2018;Kinsella,2018;Sawyer,2017;Stone,2015;Ulger,2019;Veon,2014),但对创造力的理解导致人们认识到,它必须既新颖又适合上下文(Amabile,2018;Cropley,2016;Goetz-Zwirn和Vande Zande,2015;考夫曼和贝尔,2012;Plucker,2018)。虽然“在上下文中”添加了适当的概念,为视觉艺术家创造了更多的空间,但适当性的限制仍然存在。对于视觉艺术和设计讲师来说,这会产生紧张感。我如何鼓励学生发挥创造力,突破界限,同时教会他们注意限制?本文讨论了在本科生设计教育工作室课堂上的观察结果,学生们在课堂上学习使用过程和缩略图,将他们的概念超越可预测的范围,进入激进或新颖的领域。经过修改的设计思维过程提供了一种结构,让学生对探索想法充满信心。当修改有价值时,来自同行和讲师的持续反馈既有助于推动想法,也有助于控制想法。这个过程需要勤奋和实践。它还要求学生们从思维中解脱出来,从一个连续体上看待他们的工作。反思鼓励学生接受新颖思想的价值的相关方法是值得的,同时也要承认观众。鼓励学生认识到创造力是通过过程增强的,同时也能理解创造力的本质,这是很有价值的,可以导致产生激进的想法,这些想法不仅因为新颖,而且因为“合适”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tercio Creciente
Tercio Creciente HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
“ESCARP” Método de educación musical tecnológico y lúdico: implementación en pandemia y post pandemia La interpretación musical como proceso científico y artístico: su estudio en la obra para violonchelo de José Luis Greco (1953-) Stars and precariousness in the art world. Nociones sensibles del sujeto: una propuesta de acercamiento afectivo al cuerpo Sintonías y tensiones en la colaboración desde la relación pedagógica en el contexto Universidad-Sociedad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1