Scientific Associations as Communities of Practice for Fostering Collaborative Knowledge Building: Case Study of IAKM

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2021-09-05 DOI:10.34190/ejkm.19.2.2369
M. Handzic, C. Bratianu, E. Bolisani
{"title":"Scientific Associations as Communities of Practice for Fostering Collaborative Knowledge Building: Case Study of IAKM","authors":"M. Handzic, C. Bratianu, E. Bolisani","doi":"10.34190/ejkm.19.2.2369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge building is a social process that is driven by the willingness of people to share their expertise and create new knowledge. Scientific Communities of Practice (CoPs) are communities of professors and researchers whose aim is to foster scientific knowledge generation. In the KM literature, research concerning this kind of CoPs has been substantially neglected so far. The present research analyses the case study of the International Association for Knowledge Management (IAKM) seen as a scientific CoP where members are mostly academics with research interests in developing and promoting knowledge management. Based on a collection of quantitative and qualitative data about member collaborations and scientific production, the study investigates the structure of interactions and the collaborative processes of IAKM members and the specific mechanisms of knowledge building within this CoP, seen as a paradigmatic example of scientific community. Members were asked to respond to a survey regarding their collaborative activities carried out with other IAKM members in the period of 2011 – 2020. The descriptive analysis revealed the kind of collaborations, the distribution of interactions across the community, and the dynamic patterns over time. A follow-up social network analysis was used to provide deeper insight into the community structure and dynamics. The research found that a CoP can really be useful for progress in a scientific field because it can provide a platform for trust and mutual acquaintance that reduces barriers to collaboration and knowledge building across different universities, professional roles, countries, and cultures, which is increasingly important for the progress of science. Most importantly, IAKM exhibited a cohesive and active core membership with pivotal roles played by a number of active members, which contributed significantly to the growth of the Association and, in general, to the advancements in the field of KM through collaborative knowledge building.","PeriodicalId":37211,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.19.2.2369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Knowledge building is a social process that is driven by the willingness of people to share their expertise and create new knowledge. Scientific Communities of Practice (CoPs) are communities of professors and researchers whose aim is to foster scientific knowledge generation. In the KM literature, research concerning this kind of CoPs has been substantially neglected so far. The present research analyses the case study of the International Association for Knowledge Management (IAKM) seen as a scientific CoP where members are mostly academics with research interests in developing and promoting knowledge management. Based on a collection of quantitative and qualitative data about member collaborations and scientific production, the study investigates the structure of interactions and the collaborative processes of IAKM members and the specific mechanisms of knowledge building within this CoP, seen as a paradigmatic example of scientific community. Members were asked to respond to a survey regarding their collaborative activities carried out with other IAKM members in the period of 2011 – 2020. The descriptive analysis revealed the kind of collaborations, the distribution of interactions across the community, and the dynamic patterns over time. A follow-up social network analysis was used to provide deeper insight into the community structure and dynamics. The research found that a CoP can really be useful for progress in a scientific field because it can provide a platform for trust and mutual acquaintance that reduces barriers to collaboration and knowledge building across different universities, professional roles, countries, and cultures, which is increasingly important for the progress of science. Most importantly, IAKM exhibited a cohesive and active core membership with pivotal roles played by a number of active members, which contributed significantly to the growth of the Association and, in general, to the advancements in the field of KM through collaborative knowledge building.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学协会作为促进协作知识建设的实践社区:IAKM的案例研究
知识建设是一个社会过程,它是由人们愿意分享他们的专业知识和创造新知识所驱动的。科学实践社区(cop)是由教授和研究人员组成的社区,其目的是促进科学知识的产生。在KM文献中,关于这类cop的研究迄今为止基本上被忽视了。本研究分析了国际知识管理协会(IAKM)的案例研究,该协会被视为一个科学的缔约方会议,其成员大多是对发展和促进知识管理有研究兴趣的学者。基于关于成员合作和科学生产的定量和定性数据,该研究调查了IAKM成员的相互作用结构和合作过程,以及该缔约方会议内知识建设的具体机制,该缔约方会议被视为科学界的范例。成员被要求对一项关于他们在2011年至2020年期间与其他IAKM成员开展的合作活动的调查作出回应。描述性分析揭示了协作的类型、跨社区的交互分布以及随时间变化的动态模式。通过后续的社会网络分析,对社区结构和动态有了更深入的了解。研究发现,缔约方会议确实有助于科学领域的进步,因为它可以提供一个信任和相互认识的平台,减少不同大学、专业角色、国家和文化之间的合作和知识建设障碍,这对科学进步越来越重要。最重要的是,IAKM展示了一个凝聚力和活跃的核心成员,许多活跃的成员发挥了关键作用,这对协会的发展做出了重大贡献,总的来说,通过协作知识建设,在知识管理领域取得了进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The KLC Cultures' Synergy Power, Trust, and Tacit Knowledge for Organizational Intelligence Impact of Human Resource Information System Performance for Sustainable Health Sector in South Africa EJKM Editorial: 2024 State of the Journal A Systematic Literature Review on University Collaboration in Open Innovation: Trends, Technologies, and Frameworks Critical Aspects of a Higher Education Reform for Continuous Lifelong Learning Opportunities in a Digital Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1