Examining differential responses to the Take Care of Me trial: A latent class and moderation analysis

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100437
Jona R. Frohlich , Karli K. Rapinda , Michael P. Schaub , Andreas Wenger , Christian Baumgartner , Edward A. Johnson , Matthijs Blankers , David D. Ebert , Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos , Corey S. Mackenzie , Jeffrey D. Wardell , Jason D. Edgerton , Matthew T. Keough
{"title":"Examining differential responses to the Take Care of Me trial: A latent class and moderation analysis","authors":"Jona R. Frohlich ,&nbsp;Karli K. Rapinda ,&nbsp;Michael P. Schaub ,&nbsp;Andreas Wenger ,&nbsp;Christian Baumgartner ,&nbsp;Edward A. Johnson ,&nbsp;Matthijs Blankers ,&nbsp;David D. Ebert ,&nbsp;Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos ,&nbsp;Corey S. Mackenzie ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Wardell ,&nbsp;Jason D. Edgerton ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Keough","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given prevalent alcohol misuse-emotional comorbidities among young adults, we developed an internet-based integrated treatment called <em>Take Care of Me</em>. Although the treatment had an impact on several secondary outcomes, effects were not observed for the primary outcome. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to examine heterogeneity in treatment responses. The initial RCT randomized participants to either a treatment or psychoeducational control condition. We conducted an exploratory latent class analysis to distinguish individuals based on pre-treatment risk and then used moderated regressions to examine differential treatment responses based on class membership. We found evidence for three distinct groups. Most participants fell in the “low severity” group (n = 123), followed by the “moderate severity” group (n = 57) who had a higher likelihood of endorsing a previous mental health diagnosis and treatment and higher symptom severity than the low group. The “high severity” group (n = 42) endorsed a family history of alcoholism, and the highest symptom severity and executive dysfunction. Moderated regressions revealed significant class differences in treatment responses. In the treatment condition, high severity (relative to low) participants reported higher alcohol consumption and hazardous drinking and lower quality of life at follow-up, whereas moderate severity (relative to low) individuals had lower alcohol consumption at follow-up, and lower hazardous drinking at end-of-treatment. No class differences were found for participants in the control group. Higher risk individuals in the treatment condition had poorer responses to the program. Tailoring interventions to severity may be important to examine in future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853222000323/pdfft?md5=9f82b1fe90e5c0ee8eb71bd375c33190&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853222000323-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853222000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given prevalent alcohol misuse-emotional comorbidities among young adults, we developed an internet-based integrated treatment called Take Care of Me. Although the treatment had an impact on several secondary outcomes, effects were not observed for the primary outcome. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to examine heterogeneity in treatment responses. The initial RCT randomized participants to either a treatment or psychoeducational control condition. We conducted an exploratory latent class analysis to distinguish individuals based on pre-treatment risk and then used moderated regressions to examine differential treatment responses based on class membership. We found evidence for three distinct groups. Most participants fell in the “low severity” group (n = 123), followed by the “moderate severity” group (n = 57) who had a higher likelihood of endorsing a previous mental health diagnosis and treatment and higher symptom severity than the low group. The “high severity” group (n = 42) endorsed a family history of alcoholism, and the highest symptom severity and executive dysfunction. Moderated regressions revealed significant class differences in treatment responses. In the treatment condition, high severity (relative to low) participants reported higher alcohol consumption and hazardous drinking and lower quality of life at follow-up, whereas moderate severity (relative to low) individuals had lower alcohol consumption at follow-up, and lower hazardous drinking at end-of-treatment. No class differences were found for participants in the control group. Higher risk individuals in the treatment condition had poorer responses to the program. Tailoring interventions to severity may be important to examine in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验对“照顾我”试验的不同反应:一个潜在类别和适度分析
鉴于年轻人中普遍存在的酒精滥用和情绪合并症,我们开发了一种基于互联网的综合治疗方法,名为“照顾我”。虽然治疗对几个次要结局有影响,但对主要结局没有观察到影响。因此,本研究的目的是检查治疗反应的异质性。最初的随机对照试验将参与者随机分为治疗组和心理教育对照组。我们进行了探索性潜在类别分析,以区分基于治疗前风险的个体,然后使用适度回归来检查基于类别成员的不同治疗反应。我们发现了三个不同群体的证据。大多数参与者属于“低严重程度”组(n = 123),其次是“中度严重程度”组(n = 57),他们比低严重程度组更有可能认可以前的精神健康诊断和治疗,症状严重程度也更高。“重度”组(n = 42)有酗酒家族史,症状严重程度最高,执行功能障碍。适度回归显示治疗反应有显著的阶级差异。在治疗条件下,严重程度高(相对于低)的参与者报告了更高的饮酒量和危险饮酒,随访时的生活质量较低,而中度严重(相对于低)的个体在随访时的饮酒量较低,治疗结束时的危险饮酒也较低。对照组的参与者没有发现阶级差异。在治疗条件下,高风险个体对该计划的反应较差。在未来的研究中,根据严重程度调整干预措施可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
期刊最新文献
Genomic factors associated with substance use disorder relapse: A critical review Mokken scale analysis of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short-Form and the Gaming Disorder Test The influence of sociodemographic, tobacco use, and mental health characteristics on treatment adherence among adults enrolled in a community-based tobacco cessation program Examining problem gambling, substance use disorders and cluster B personality traits among incarcerated individuals Cigarette smoking status and COVID-19 hospitalization in the context of cannabis use: An electronic health record cohort study in northern California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1