How to Achieve Maximum Participation of Users in Technical Versus Nontechnical Online Q&A Communities?

IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Electronic Commerce Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10864415.2022.2123645
Sohaib Mustafa, Wen Zhang
{"title":"How to Achieve Maximum Participation of Users in Technical Versus Nontechnical Online Q&A Communities?","authors":"Sohaib Mustafa, Wen Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10864415.2022.2123645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Low user participation in online questions-and-answers (Q&A) communities to contribute knowledge is a serious threat to the sustainability of online forums. This subject is rarely addressed in the context of content shared at these forums. Furthermore, no study has introduced solutions to reduce low participation exclusively considering participants’ age, gender, and education level. User participation in the online question and answer (Q&A) communities to contribute knowledge was mostly examined by applying variance-based methodologies using primary and secondary datasets. This study has targeted the asymmetrical relationship between variables to achieve users’ participation in technical and nontechnical knowledge-sharing communities. We have collected valid responses, 382 from nontechnical and 395 from technical knowledge-sharing communities, and applied fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to get various equally effective configurations. These configurations explain maximum users’ participation in sharing knowledge in online Q&A communities. fsQCA results have also revealed that to achieve maximum user participation and knowledge contribution in technical knowledge-sharing communities, a sense of reciprocation and online social interaction are the necessary conditions, whereas for nontechnical knowledge-sharing communities, online social interaction is the necessary condition. Study findings are important for online Q&A community managers to minimize low user participation and achieve maximum knowledge contribution in online communities.","PeriodicalId":13928,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electronic Commerce","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electronic Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2022.2123645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

ABSTRACT Low user participation in online questions-and-answers (Q&A) communities to contribute knowledge is a serious threat to the sustainability of online forums. This subject is rarely addressed in the context of content shared at these forums. Furthermore, no study has introduced solutions to reduce low participation exclusively considering participants’ age, gender, and education level. User participation in the online question and answer (Q&A) communities to contribute knowledge was mostly examined by applying variance-based methodologies using primary and secondary datasets. This study has targeted the asymmetrical relationship between variables to achieve users’ participation in technical and nontechnical knowledge-sharing communities. We have collected valid responses, 382 from nontechnical and 395 from technical knowledge-sharing communities, and applied fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to get various equally effective configurations. These configurations explain maximum users’ participation in sharing knowledge in online Q&A communities. fsQCA results have also revealed that to achieve maximum user participation and knowledge contribution in technical knowledge-sharing communities, a sense of reciprocation and online social interaction are the necessary conditions, whereas for nontechnical knowledge-sharing communities, online social interaction is the necessary condition. Study findings are important for online Q&A community managers to minimize low user participation and achieve maximum knowledge contribution in online communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何实现技术性与非技术性在线问答社区用户的最大参与度?
摘要用户在在线问答社区中贡献知识的参与度低,严重威胁到在线论坛的可持续性。在这些论坛上分享的内容很少涉及这一主题。此外,没有一项研究专门考虑参与者的年龄、性别和教育水平,提出减少低参与度的解决方案。用户参与在线问答社区贡献知识的情况主要是通过使用初级和次级数据集应用基于方差的方法来检查的。本研究针对变量之间的不对称关系,实现用户参与技术和非技术知识共享社区。我们收集了有效的回应,382来自非技术性的,395来自技术知识共享社区,并应用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)获得了各种同样有效的配置。这些配置解释了用户在在线问答社区中分享知识的最大参与度。fsQCA结果还表明,在技术知识共享社区中,要实现用户最大程度的参与和知识贡献,互动意识和在线社交是必要条件,而对于非技术知识共享群体,在线社交是必需条件。研究结果对于在线问答社区管理者来说非常重要,以最大限度地减少在线社区中用户的低参与度并实现最大的知识贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
International Journal of Electronic Commerce 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Electronic Commerce is the leading refereed quarterly devoted to advancing the understanding and practice of electronic commerce. It serves the needs of researchers as well as practitioners and executives involved in electronic commerce. The Journal aims to offer an integrated view of the field by presenting approaches of multiple disciplines. Electronic commerce is the sharing of business information, maintaining business relationships, and conducting business transactions by digital means over telecommunications networks. The Journal accepts empirical and interpretive submissions that make a significant novel contribution to this field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Prototypicality Adherence Effects on User Engagement in User-Generated Video Platforms The Impact of Geography on the Success of Prosocial Crowdfunding How to Retain My Consumers? Investigating Incumbents’ Promotional Strategies Upon New Business Entry in the Online-to-Offline Context Avoiding Imprudent Commitments to Fast Dispatch: The Influence of Platform-Issued Quick-Seller Certificates on Postpurchase Behavior Cannibalization or Enhancement: Effects of Consumer-to-Consumer Resale with Consumers’ Utility Dependence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1