The Class is Greener on the Other Side: How Private Donations to Public Schools Play into Fair Funding

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Duke Law Journal Pub Date : 2017-01-09 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2915479
A. Frisch
{"title":"The Class is Greener on the Other Side: How Private Donations to Public Schools Play into Fair Funding","authors":"A. Frisch","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2915479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public schools have long drawn on private sources of funding to supplement federal, state, and local public funding. In the last thirty years, private funding has grown in sophistication and prominence, leading many schools to increasingly rely on formal educational support organizations to meet their budgetary needs. This trend, however, may be in tension with state funding schemes that attempt to weaken the link between a community's wealth and the quality of its schools. Educational support organizations appear to feature the same socioeconomic stratification that gave rise to the need for state formulas to mitigate differences in local funding based on the wealth of the community. Yet, there is no state legislation that speaks to the equitable results of private funding for public schools. This Note argues that it is an appropriate time for state legislatures to address the interplay between private donations and public school funding, and provides several frameworks by which to balance the competing interests related to the provision of high quality education and fair funding.","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"427-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2915479","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2915479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Public schools have long drawn on private sources of funding to supplement federal, state, and local public funding. In the last thirty years, private funding has grown in sophistication and prominence, leading many schools to increasingly rely on formal educational support organizations to meet their budgetary needs. This trend, however, may be in tension with state funding schemes that attempt to weaken the link between a community's wealth and the quality of its schools. Educational support organizations appear to feature the same socioeconomic stratification that gave rise to the need for state formulas to mitigate differences in local funding based on the wealth of the community. Yet, there is no state legislation that speaks to the equitable results of private funding for public schools. This Note argues that it is an appropriate time for state legislatures to address the interplay between private donations and public school funding, and provides several frameworks by which to balance the competing interests related to the provision of high quality education and fair funding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
另一边的课堂更环保:私立学校的捐款如何成为公平的资助
长期以来,公立学校一直依靠私人资金来源来补充联邦、州和地方的公共资金。在过去的三十年里,私人资助变得越来越复杂和突出,导致许多学校越来越依赖正式的教育支持组织来满足他们的预算需求。然而,这种趋势可能与试图削弱社区财富与学校质量之间联系的国家资助计划相矛盾。教育支持组织似乎具有相同的社会经济阶层,这导致需要国家公式来缓解基于社区财富的地方资金差异。然而,没有一个州的立法对公立学校的私人资金的公平结果作出说明。本文认为,现在是州立法机构解决私人捐赠和公立学校资助之间相互作用的适当时机,并提供了几个框架,通过这些框架来平衡与提供高质量教育和公平资助相关的竞争利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.
期刊最新文献
The Gorsuch Test: Gundy v. United States, Limiting the Administrative State, and the Future of Nondelegation Stem cell injections for axial back pain: a systematic review of associated risks and complications with a case illustration of diffuse hyperplastic gliosis resulting in cauda equina syndrome. Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium. Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance. Prescription Drug Policing: The Right to Health Information Privacy Pre- and Post-Carpenter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1