首页 > 最新文献

Duke Law Journal最新文献

英文 中文
The Gorsuch Test: Gundy v. United States, Limiting the Administrative State, and the Future of Nondelegation 戈萨奇检验:甘迪诉美国,限制行政国家,以及非授权的未来
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2020-03-09 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3550906
John Hall
In Gundy v. United States, for the first time since 1935, four justices expressed a willingness to revisit the nondelegation doctrine that has been left undisturbed for over eighty years. Justice Neil Gorsuch proposed a new test for approaching nondelegation challenges. He averred that a legislature can only give power under three circumstances: (1) to “fill up the details”; (2) to make the application of a rule dependent on certain executive fact-finding; or (3) to assign non-legislative responsibilities to either the judicial or executive branch. The three prongs of his analysis form the new Gorsuch test. Given the split on the issue, the importance of understanding Justice Gorsuch’s Gundy dissent becomes paramount. This student Note is one of the first academic pieces to situate the Gorsuch test within the nondelegation doctrine. It argues that the test is stricter than any prior version and would severely curtail the ability of Congress to give agencies power, thus limiting the administrative state. Part I introduces the disputed statute in Gundy, the factual circumstances underlying the case, the debates in the briefs and at oral argument, and the three fractured opinions. The case history reveals the neither the Court nor the parties significantly considered a new test for the nondelegation doctrine. Justice Gorsuch’s dissenting opinion, outlined in Part I, has three salient features: a statutory reading, an originalism discussion, and his proposal. Part II considers the original understanding and history of the nondelegation doctrine, criticizing Justice Gorsuch for omitting pertinent evidence from the text, constitutional convention, early legislation, contemporary state interpretations, and the first Supreme Court nondelegation opinions. Then, it explores the case law and past proposals for a narrower nondelegation test than the “intelligible principle,” emphasizing that no court has ever rigorously enforced the nondelegation principle, even as the administrative state grew exponentially. Part III considers the weaknesses and potential impact of the Gorsuch test. It analyzes Justice Gorsuch’s previous opinion on the question, past Supreme Court nondelegation tests, the effects on other broad statutes, the need for doctrinal clarity, and a potential application of his proposal. Ultimately, this Note concludes that the problems of clarity and application caution against its adoption.
在甘迪诉美国案(Gundy v. United States)中,自1935年以来首次有四名大法官表示愿意重新审视80多年来未曾受到干扰的非授权原则。大法官尼尔·戈萨奇(Neil Gorsuch)提出了一项新的测试,以应对非授权挑战。他强调,立法机关只能在三种情况下授权:(1)“填补细节”;(二)使规则的适用依赖于行政机关的某些事实认定;或者(3)将非立法责任分配给司法或行政部门。他的分析的三个方面构成了新的戈萨奇测试。考虑到在这个问题上的分歧,理解戈萨奇大法官的甘迪异议的重要性变得至关重要。这篇学生笔记是第一批将戈萨奇测试置于非授权原则中的学术文章之一。它辩称,该测试比以往任何版本都要严格,并将严重削弱国会赋予机构权力的能力,从而限制行政国家。第一部分介绍了甘迪案中有争议的法规,案件背后的事实情况,摘要和口头辩论中的辩论,以及三种分裂的意见。案例历史表明,法院和当事人都没有认真考虑过对非授权原则的新考验。第一部分概述了戈萨奇大法官的反对意见,它有三个显著特点:法定解读、原旨主义讨论和他的提案。第二部分考虑了非授权原则的原始理解和历史,批评戈萨奇大法官从文本、宪法惯例、早期立法、当代国家解释和最高法院第一份非授权意见中省略了相关证据。然后,它探讨了判例法和比“可理解原则”更狭窄的非授权测试的过去建议,强调没有法院严格执行非授权原则,即使行政国家呈指数级增长。第三部分考虑了戈萨奇测试的弱点和潜在影响。它分析了戈萨奇法官之前对这个问题的意见,最高法院过去的非授权测试,对其他广泛法规的影响,对教义清晰度的需求,以及他的提议的潜在应用。最后,本说明的结论是,明确性和应用方面的问题告诫不宜采用该办法。
{"title":"The Gorsuch Test: Gundy v. United States, Limiting the Administrative State, and the Future of Nondelegation","authors":"John Hall","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3550906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3550906","url":null,"abstract":"In Gundy v. United States, for the first time since 1935, four justices expressed a willingness to revisit the nondelegation doctrine that has been left undisturbed for over eighty years. Justice Neil Gorsuch proposed a new test for approaching nondelegation challenges. He averred that a legislature can only give power under three circumstances: (1) to “fill up the details”; (2) to make the application of a rule dependent on certain executive fact-finding; or (3) to assign non-legislative responsibilities to either the judicial or executive branch. The three prongs of his analysis form the new Gorsuch test. \u0000 \u0000Given the split on the issue, the importance of understanding Justice Gorsuch’s Gundy dissent becomes paramount. This student Note is one of the first academic pieces to situate the Gorsuch test within the nondelegation doctrine. It argues that the test is stricter than any prior version and would severely curtail the ability of Congress to give agencies power, thus limiting the administrative state. \u0000 \u0000Part I introduces the disputed statute in Gundy, the factual circumstances underlying the case, the debates in the briefs and at oral argument, and the three fractured opinions. The case history reveals the neither the Court nor the parties significantly considered a new test for the nondelegation doctrine. Justice Gorsuch’s dissenting opinion, outlined in Part I, has three salient features: a statutory reading, an originalism discussion, and his proposal. Part II considers the original understanding and history of the nondelegation doctrine, criticizing Justice Gorsuch for omitting pertinent evidence from the text, constitutional convention, early legislation, contemporary state interpretations, and the first Supreme Court nondelegation opinions. Then, it explores the case law and past proposals for a narrower nondelegation test than the “intelligible principle,” emphasizing that no court has ever rigorously enforced the nondelegation principle, even as the administrative state grew exponentially. Part III considers the weaknesses and potential impact of the Gorsuch test. It analyzes Justice Gorsuch’s previous opinion on the question, past Supreme Court nondelegation tests, the effects on other broad statutes, the need for doctrinal clarity, and a potential application of his proposal. Ultimately, this Note concludes that the problems of clarity and application caution against its adoption.","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":"175-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49025735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Stem cell injections for axial back pain: a systematic review of associated risks and complications with a case illustration of diffuse hyperplastic gliosis resulting in cauda equina syndrome. 干细胞注射治疗轴性背痛:对相关风险和并发症的系统回顾,以及弥漫性增生性胶质病导致马尾综合征的病例说明。
IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2019-09-06 Print Date: 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19594
Salah G Aoun, Valery Peinado Reyes, Tarek Y El Ahmadieh, Matthew Davies, Ankur R Patel, Vin Shen Ban, Aaron Plitt, Najib E El Tecle, Jessica R Moreno, Jack Raisanen, Carlos A Bagley

Objective: Axial low-back pain is a disease of epidemic proportions that exerts a heavy global toll on the active workforce and results in more than half a trillion dollars in annual costs. Stem cell injections are being increasingly advertised as a restorative solution for various degenerative diseases and are becoming more affordable and attainable by the public. There have been multiple reports in the media of these injections being easily available abroad outside of clinical trials, but scientific evidence supporting them remains scarce. The authors present a case of a serious complication after a stem cell injection for back pain and provide a systematic review of the literature of the efficacy of this treatment as well as the associated risks and complications.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus online electronic databases to identify articles reporting stem cell injections for axial back pain in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary focus was on outcomes and complications. A case of glial hyperplasia of the roots of the cauda equina directly related to stem cell injections performed abroad is also reported.

Results: The authors identified 14 publications (including a total of 147 patients) that met the search criteria. Three of the articles presented data for the same patient population with different durations of follow-up and were thus analyzed as a single study, reducing the total number of studies to 12. In these 12 studies, follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 6 years, with 50% having a follow-up period of 1 year or less. Most studies reported favorable outcomes, although 36% used subjective measures. There was a tendency for pain relief to wane after 6 months to 2 years, with patients seeking a surgical solution. Only 1 study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Conclusions: There are still insufficient data to support stem cell injections for back pain. Additional RCTs with long-term follow-up are necessary before statements can be made regarding the efficacy and safety.

目的:轴性腰背痛是一种流行性疾病,在全球范围内对在职人员造成了严重的伤害,每年造成的损失超过 5 万亿美元。干细胞注射被越来越多地宣传为治疗各种退行性疾病的恢复性解决方案,而且越来越为公众所接受和负担得起。媒体曾多次报道,在临床试验之外,这些注射在国外也很容易获得,但支持它们的科学证据仍然很少。作者介绍了一例干细胞注射治疗背痛后出现严重并发症的病例,并对这种治疗方法的疗效以及相关风险和并发症的文献进行了系统回顾:方法:根据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed、Google Scholar和Scopus在线电子数据库对文献进行了系统回顾,以确定报道干细胞注射治疗轴性背痛的文章。主要重点是结果和并发症。此外,还报告了一例与国外干细胞注射直接相关的马尾神经根胶质增生病例:作者发现了14篇符合搜索标准的文献(共包括147名患者)。其中三篇文章提供了同一患者群体的数据,但随访时间不同,因此作为一项研究进行分析,从而将研究总数减少到12项。在这 12 项研究中,随访时间从 6 个月到 6 年不等,其中 50% 的随访时间为 1 年或更短。大多数研究报告了良好的疗效,但其中 36% 采用的是主观测量方法。6 个月至 2 年后,疼痛缓解有减弱的趋势,患者会寻求手术治疗。只有一项研究是随机对照试验(RCT):结论:目前仍没有足够数据支持干细胞注射治疗背痛。结论:目前还没有足够的数据支持干细胞注射治疗背痛,有必要进行更多的RCT研究,并进行长期随访,才能就其有效性和安全性做出结论。
{"title":"Stem cell injections for axial back pain: a systematic review of associated risks and complications with a case illustration of diffuse hyperplastic gliosis resulting in cauda equina syndrome.","authors":"Salah G Aoun, Valery Peinado Reyes, Tarek Y El Ahmadieh, Matthew Davies, Ankur R Patel, Vin Shen Ban, Aaron Plitt, Najib E El Tecle, Jessica R Moreno, Jack Raisanen, Carlos A Bagley","doi":"10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19594","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Axial low-back pain is a disease of epidemic proportions that exerts a heavy global toll on the active workforce and results in more than half a trillion dollars in annual costs. Stem cell injections are being increasingly advertised as a restorative solution for various degenerative diseases and are becoming more affordable and attainable by the public. There have been multiple reports in the media of these injections being easily available abroad outside of clinical trials, but scientific evidence supporting them remains scarce. The authors present a case of a serious complication after a stem cell injection for back pain and provide a systematic review of the literature of the efficacy of this treatment as well as the associated risks and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus online electronic databases to identify articles reporting stem cell injections for axial back pain in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary focus was on outcomes and complications. A case of glial hyperplasia of the roots of the cauda equina directly related to stem cell injections performed abroad is also reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 14 publications (including a total of 147 patients) that met the search criteria. Three of the articles presented data for the same patient population with different durations of follow-up and were thus analyzed as a single study, reducing the total number of studies to 12. In these 12 studies, follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 6 years, with 50% having a follow-up period of 1 year or less. Most studies reported favorable outcomes, although 36% used subjective measures. There was a tendency for pain relief to wane after 6 months to 2 years, with patients seeking a surgical solution. Only 1 study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are still insufficient data to support stem cell injections for back pain. Additional RCTs with long-term follow-up are necessary before statements can be made regarding the efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"906-913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90551472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium. Park-Reeves鞘膜积液研究联合会的I型Chiari畸形和脊髓鞘膜积液患者脊柱侧弯的放射学和临床预测因素。
IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2019-08-16 Print Date: 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.PEDS18527
Jennifer M Strahle, Rukayat Taiwo, Christine Averill, James Torner, Chevis N Shannon, Christopher M Bonfield, Gerald F Tuite, Tammy Bethel-Anderson, Jerrel Rutlin, Douglas L Brockmeyer, John C Wellons, Jeffrey R Leonard, Francesco T Mangano, James M Johnston, Manish N Shah, Bermans J Iskandar, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, David J Daniels, Eric M Jackson, Gerald A Grant, Daniel E Couture, P David Adelson, Tord D Alden, Philipp R Aldana, Richard C E Anderson, Nathan R Selden, Lissa C Baird, Karin Bierbrauer, Joshua J Chern, William E Whitehead, Richard G Ellenbogen, Herbert E Fuchs, Daniel J Guillaume, Todd C Hankinson, Mark R Iantosca, W Jerry Oakes, Robert F Keating, Nickalus R Khan, Michael S Muhlbauer, J Gordon McComb, Arnold H Menezes, John Ragheb, Jodi L Smith, Cormac O Maher, Stephanie Greene, Michael Kelly, Brent R O'Neill, Mark D Krieger, Mandeep Tamber, Susan R Durham, Greg Olavarria, Scellig S D Stone, Bruce A Kaufman, Gregory G Heuer, David F Bauer, Gregory Albert, Jeffrey P Greenfield, Scott D Wait, Mark D Van Poppel, Ramin Eskandari, Timothy Mapstone, Joshua S Shimony, Ralph G Dacey, Matthew D Smyth, Tae Sung Park, David D Limbrick

Objective: Scoliosis is frequently a presenting sign of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) with syrinx. The authors' goal was to define scoliosis in this population and describe how radiological characteristics of CM-I and syrinx relate to the presence and severity of scoliosis.

Methods: A large multicenter retrospective and prospective registry of pediatric patients with CM-I (tonsils ≥ 5 mm below the foramen magnum) and syrinx (≥ 3 mm in axial width) was reviewed for clinical and radiological characteristics of CM-I, syrinx, and scoliosis (coronal curve ≥ 10°).

Results: Based on available imaging of patients with CM-I and syrinx, 260 of 825 patients (31%) had a clear diagnosis of scoliosis based on radiographs or coronal MRI. Forty-nine patients (5.9%) did not have scoliosis, and in 516 (63%) patients, a clear determination of the presence or absence of scoliosis could not be made. Comparison of patients with and those without a definite scoliosis diagnosis indicated that scoliosis was associated with wider syrinxes (8.7 vs 6.3 mm, OR 1.25, p < 0.001), longer syrinxes (10.3 vs 6.2 levels, OR 1.18, p < 0.001), syrinxes with their rostral extent located in the cervical spine (94% vs 80%, OR 3.91, p = 0.001), and holocord syrinxes (50% vs 16%, OR 5.61, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed syrinx length and the presence of holocord syrinx to be independent predictors of scoliosis in this patient cohort. Scoliosis was not associated with sex, age at CM-I diagnosis, tonsil position, pB-C2 distance (measured perpendicular distance from the ventral dura to a line drawn from the basion to the posterior-inferior aspect of C2), clivoaxial angle, or frontal-occipital horn ratio. Average curve magnitude was 29.9°, and 37.7% of patients had a left thoracic curve. Older age at CM-I or syrinx diagnosis (p < 0.0001) was associated with greater curve magnitude whereas there was no association between syrinx dimensions and curve magnitude.

Conclusions: Syrinx characteristics, but not tonsil position, were related to the presence of scoliosis in patients with CM-I, and there was an independent association of syrinx length and holocord syrinx with scoliosis. Further study is needed to evaluate the nature of the relationship between syrinx and scoliosis in patients with CM-I.

目的:脊柱侧弯是Chiari畸形I型(CM-I)合并鞘膜积液的常见症状。作者的目标是定义这一人群中的脊柱侧弯,并描述 CM-I 和鞘膜积液的放射学特征与脊柱侧弯的存在和严重程度之间的关系:方法:作者回顾了一个大型多中心回顾性和前瞻性登记处,登记了患有CM-I(扁桃体位于枕骨大孔下方≥5毫米)和鞘膜积液(轴向宽度≥3毫米)的儿童患者,以了解CM-I、鞘膜积液和脊柱侧弯(冠状曲线≥10°)的临床和放射学特征:根据现有的 CM-I 和鞘膜积液患者的影像学资料,825 例患者中有 260 例(31%)根据影像学或冠状磁共振成像明确诊断为脊柱侧弯。49名患者(5.9%)没有脊柱侧弯,516名患者(63%)无法明确判断是否存在脊柱侧弯。对确诊脊柱侧弯和未确诊脊柱侧弯的患者进行比较后发现,脊柱侧弯与鞘状突宽度(8.7 mm vs 6.3 mm,OR 1.25,p < 0.001)、鞘状突长度(10.3 vs 6.2水平,OR 1.18,p < 0.001)、喙突位于颈椎的鞘膜积液(94% vs 80%,OR 3.91,p = 0.001)和全椎鞘膜积液(50% vs 16%,OR 5.61,p < 0.001)有关。多变量回归分析显示,鞘膜积液长度和全脐鞘膜积液是该组患者脊柱侧弯的独立预测因素。脊柱侧弯与性别、诊断为CM-I时的年龄、扁桃体位置、pB-C2距离(测量从腹侧硬脑膜到从基底到C2后内侧的直线的垂直距离)、clivoaxial角度或额枕角比率无关。平均曲线幅度为 29.9°,37.7% 的患者为左胸曲线。CM-I或鞘膜积液确诊时的年龄越大(p < 0.0001),曲线幅度越大,而鞘膜积液的尺寸与曲线幅度之间没有关联:结论:CM-I患者的鞘膜特征(而非扁桃体位置)与脊柱侧凸的存在有关,鞘膜长度和整体鞘膜与脊柱侧凸存在独立关联。需要进一步研究以评估CM-I患者鞘膜积液与脊柱侧弯之间关系的性质。
{"title":"Radiological and clinical predictors of scoliosis in patients with Chiari malformation type I and spinal cord syrinx from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium.","authors":"Jennifer M Strahle, Rukayat Taiwo, Christine Averill, James Torner, Chevis N Shannon, Christopher M Bonfield, Gerald F Tuite, Tammy Bethel-Anderson, Jerrel Rutlin, Douglas L Brockmeyer, John C Wellons, Jeffrey R Leonard, Francesco T Mangano, James M Johnston, Manish N Shah, Bermans J Iskandar, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, David J Daniels, Eric M Jackson, Gerald A Grant, Daniel E Couture, P David Adelson, Tord D Alden, Philipp R Aldana, Richard C E Anderson, Nathan R Selden, Lissa C Baird, Karin Bierbrauer, Joshua J Chern, William E Whitehead, Richard G Ellenbogen, Herbert E Fuchs, Daniel J Guillaume, Todd C Hankinson, Mark R Iantosca, W Jerry Oakes, Robert F Keating, Nickalus R Khan, Michael S Muhlbauer, J Gordon McComb, Arnold H Menezes, John Ragheb, Jodi L Smith, Cormac O Maher, Stephanie Greene, Michael Kelly, Brent R O'Neill, Mark D Krieger, Mandeep Tamber, Susan R Durham, Greg Olavarria, Scellig S D Stone, Bruce A Kaufman, Gregory G Heuer, David F Bauer, Gregory Albert, Jeffrey P Greenfield, Scott D Wait, Mark D Van Poppel, Ramin Eskandari, Timothy Mapstone, Joshua S Shimony, Ralph G Dacey, Matthew D Smyth, Tae Sung Park, David D Limbrick","doi":"10.3171/2019.5.PEDS18527","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2019.5.PEDS18527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Scoliosis is frequently a presenting sign of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) with syrinx. The authors' goal was to define scoliosis in this population and describe how radiological characteristics of CM-I and syrinx relate to the presence and severity of scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large multicenter retrospective and prospective registry of pediatric patients with CM-I (tonsils ≥ 5 mm below the foramen magnum) and syrinx (≥ 3 mm in axial width) was reviewed for clinical and radiological characteristics of CM-I, syrinx, and scoliosis (coronal curve ≥ 10°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on available imaging of patients with CM-I and syrinx, 260 of 825 patients (31%) had a clear diagnosis of scoliosis based on radiographs or coronal MRI. Forty-nine patients (5.9%) did not have scoliosis, and in 516 (63%) patients, a clear determination of the presence or absence of scoliosis could not be made. Comparison of patients with and those without a definite scoliosis diagnosis indicated that scoliosis was associated with wider syrinxes (8.7 vs 6.3 mm, OR 1.25, p < 0.001), longer syrinxes (10.3 vs 6.2 levels, OR 1.18, p < 0.001), syrinxes with their rostral extent located in the cervical spine (94% vs 80%, OR 3.91, p = 0.001), and holocord syrinxes (50% vs 16%, OR 5.61, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed syrinx length and the presence of holocord syrinx to be independent predictors of scoliosis in this patient cohort. Scoliosis was not associated with sex, age at CM-I diagnosis, tonsil position, pB-C2 distance (measured perpendicular distance from the ventral dura to a line drawn from the basion to the posterior-inferior aspect of C2), clivoaxial angle, or frontal-occipital horn ratio. Average curve magnitude was 29.9°, and 37.7% of patients had a left thoracic curve. Older age at CM-I or syrinx diagnosis (p < 0.0001) was associated with greater curve magnitude whereas there was no association between syrinx dimensions and curve magnitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Syrinx characteristics, but not tonsil position, were related to the presence of scoliosis in patients with CM-I, and there was an independent association of syrinx length and holocord syrinx with scoliosis. Further study is needed to evaluate the nature of the relationship between syrinx and scoliosis in patients with CM-I.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"520-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90547181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance. 奇怪的同床共枕:美洲原住民部落,大型制药公司,以及他们联盟的合法性。
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2019-04-01
Daniel C Kennedy

Lost in the cacophony surrounding the debate about high drug prices is the fundamental principle that pharmaceutical innovation will not occur without the prospect of outsized returns enabled through market exclusivity. Biopharmaceutical patents are currently under siege, subject to challenge both in inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings and in Hatch-Waxman actions. These twin assaults threaten to eliminate the incentives necessary for biotechnological innovation--particularly for discoveries made upstream in the innovation pipeline--thus imperiling the development of new drug therapies. But a fascinating solution has emerged: invoking tribal immunity to shield pharmaceutical patents from IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). This serves two critically important objectives: promoting tribal self-sufficiency, and encouraging investment in life-saving and life-improving new drugs. Contractual partnerships between Native American tribes and pharmaceutical companies not only provide the tribes with a steady stream of royalty revenue, but also insulate biopharmaceutical patents from challenge in IPR proceedings through the invocation of long-established principles of tribal sovereign immunity. This Note is the first piece of scholarship to comprehensively analyze, and advocate for, the right to invoke tribal sovereign immunity in IPR proceedings.

在围绕高药价的争论的嘈杂声中,人们忽略了一条基本原则:如果没有市场独占性带来的巨大回报,制药创新就不会发生。生物制药专利目前受到围攻,在多方审查(“知识产权”)程序和Hatch-Waxman诉讼中都受到挑战。这两方面的打击可能会消除生物技术创新的必要动机——尤其是对创新管道上游的发现——从而危及新药物疗法的发展。但一个令人着迷的解决方案出现了:在专利审判和上诉委员会(“PTAB”)面前,援引部落豁免权来保护药品专利不受知识产权保护。这有助于实现两个至关重要的目标:促进部落自给自足,鼓励投资于挽救生命和改善生活的新药。美洲土著部落与制药公司之间的合同伙伴关系不仅为部落提供了源源不断的特许权使用费收入,而且通过援引长期确立的部落主权豁免原则,使生物制药专利在知识产权诉讼中不受质疑。这份说明是第一份全面分析和倡导在知识产权诉讼中援引部落主权豁免的权利的学术报告。
{"title":"Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance.","authors":"Daniel C Kennedy","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lost in the cacophony surrounding the debate about high drug prices is the fundamental principle that pharmaceutical innovation will not occur without the prospect of outsized returns enabled through market exclusivity. Biopharmaceutical patents are currently under siege, subject to challenge both in inter partes review (\"IPR\") proceedings and in Hatch-Waxman actions. These twin assaults threaten to eliminate the incentives necessary for biotechnological innovation--particularly for discoveries made upstream in the innovation pipeline--thus imperiling the development of new drug therapies. But a fascinating solution has emerged: invoking tribal immunity to shield pharmaceutical patents from IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (\"PTAB\"). This serves two critically important objectives: promoting tribal self-sufficiency, and encouraging investment in life-saving and life-improving new drugs. Contractual partnerships between Native American tribes and pharmaceutical companies not only provide the tribes with a steady stream of royalty revenue, but also insulate biopharmaceutical patents from challenge in IPR proceedings through the invocation of long-established principles of tribal sovereign immunity. This Note is the first piece of scholarship to comprehensively analyze, and advocate for, the right to invoke tribal sovereign immunity in IPR proceedings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"68 7","pages":"1433-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37163700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prescription Drug Policing: The Right to Health Information Privacy Pre- and Post-Carpenter 处方药监管:健康信息隐私权前后木匠
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3225000
J. Oliva
This article operates at the intersection of privacy law, Fourth Amendment doctrine, and public health realities triggered by the United States drug overdose epidemic. Reputable reporting sources, public health scholars, and pundits frequently frame the ongoing American overdose crisis as a prescription drug overdose problem attributable to the overprescribing of opioid analgesics. The problem with this narrative is that it runs counter to the current epidemiological data, which indicate that the majority of American overdose deaths are now a result of illicit drug use and not prescription drug abuse. The prescription-centric frame has nonetheless sparked the rapid rise of law enforcement and regulatory surveillance of prescribers and patients in the form of state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) databases. State PDMPs, which maintain and analyze significant data concerning every dispensed prescription, collect a stunning amount of patient protected health information (PHI). To put things in context, Americans filled 4,063,166,658 prescriptions at retail pharmacies in 2017 alone. PDMPs are largely criminal and regulatory law enforcement tools dressed up in public health promoting rhetoric. Under the guise of rogue prescriber, pill mill, and doctor shopper crack downs, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has made it a routine practice to self-issue administrative subpoenas to conduct warrantless, dragnet-style sweeps of the swarms of sensitive protected health data stored in state PDMP databases. This widespread law enforcement prescribing surveillance tactic, which reveals highly personal health information, including, among other things, patients’ contraceptive histories, gender transition decisions, and HIV diagnoses, raises serious constitutional privacy concerns. The Supreme Court’s recent Fourth Amendment decision, Carpenter v. United States, however, may limit law enforcement’s ability to continue to access droves of electronically-stored patient prescribing-related PHI in the custody of a state regulatory agency without a court order supported by probable cause. The Court’s decision in Carpenter already has been heralded as “a landmark privacy case,” which this article uniquely applies to prescription drug monitoring and law enforcement surveillance tactics provoked by the U.S. overdose crisis and its dominant narrative. Carpenter and the Fourth Amendment doctrines central to its holding motivate this article and animate its two core contentions. First, this article maintains that pertinent pre-Carpenter precedent requires the DEA to obtain a Fourth Amendment warrant in order to conduct sweeps of state PDMP databases searching patient protected health information. It then posits that courts are even more likely to rule that warrantless DEA searches of sensitive and frequently revealing health care data run afoul of the Fourth Amendment in the post-Carpenter world. Simply stated, PDMP protected health information is entitle
本文涉及隐私法、第四修正案原则和美国药物过量流行病引发的公共卫生现实的交叉点。有信誉的报道来源、公共卫生学者和权威人士经常将正在进行的美国药物过量危机描述为阿片类镇痛药过度处方导致的处方药过量问题。这种说法的问题在于,它与目前的流行病学数据背道而驰,这些数据表明,美国大多数过量死亡现在是非法药物使用而不是处方药滥用的结果。尽管如此,以处方为中心的框架还是以国家处方药监测计划(PDMP)数据库的形式引发了对处方者和患者的执法和监管监督的迅速兴起。州pdmp负责维护和分析有关每个已分配处方的重要数据,收集了数量惊人的受患者保护的健康信息(PHI)。相比之下,仅2017年一年,美国人就在零售药店开了4063166658张处方。pdmp在很大程度上是刑事和监管执法工具,伪装成促进公共卫生的说辞。在打击不法处方者、药厂和医生购物者的幌子下,美国缉毒局(Drug Enforcement Administration, DEA)已将自行发出行政传票,对存储在州PDMP数据库中的大量受保护的敏感健康数据进行未经授权的拉网式搜查,变成了一种常规做法。这种广泛的执法处方监视策略暴露了高度个人化的健康信息,其中包括患者的避孕史、性别转换决定和艾滋病毒诊断,引发了严重的宪法隐私问题。然而,最高法院最近的第四修正案裁决,卡彭特诉美国,可能会限制执法部门在没有法院命令支持的可能原因的情况下,继续访问由州监管机构保管的电子存储的患者处方相关PHI的能力。法院对卡彭特案的判决已经被誉为“具有里程碑意义的隐私案件”,本文将其独特地应用于处方药监控和执法监视策略,这些策略是由美国过量用药危机及其主导叙事引发的。卡彭特和第四修正案的核心原则激发了这篇文章,并使它的两个核心论点生动起来。首先,本文坚持认为,卡彭特案之前的相关先例要求DEA必须获得第四修正案授权,才能对州PDMP数据库进行扫描,搜索受患者保护的健康信息。然后,它假设法院更有可能裁定,在后卡彭特时代,未经授权的DEA对敏感和经常暴露的医疗保健数据的搜查违反了第四修正案。简单地说,PDMP保护的健康信息有权受到第四修正案授权的保护。
{"title":"Prescription Drug Policing: The Right to Health Information Privacy Pre- and Post-Carpenter","authors":"J. Oliva","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3225000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3225000","url":null,"abstract":"This article operates at the intersection of privacy law, Fourth Amendment doctrine, and public health realities triggered by the United States drug overdose epidemic. Reputable reporting sources, public health scholars, and pundits frequently frame the ongoing American overdose crisis as a prescription drug overdose problem attributable to the overprescribing of opioid analgesics. The problem with this narrative is that it runs counter to the current epidemiological data, which indicate that the majority of American overdose deaths are now a result of illicit drug use and not prescription drug abuse. The prescription-centric frame has nonetheless sparked the rapid rise of law enforcement and regulatory surveillance of prescribers and patients in the form of state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) databases. State PDMPs, which maintain and analyze significant data concerning every dispensed prescription, collect a stunning amount of patient protected health information (PHI). To put things in context, Americans filled 4,063,166,658 prescriptions at retail pharmacies in 2017 alone. PDMPs are largely criminal and regulatory law enforcement tools dressed up in public health promoting rhetoric. Under the guise of rogue prescriber, pill mill, and doctor shopper crack downs, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has made it a routine practice to self-issue administrative subpoenas to conduct warrantless, dragnet-style sweeps of the swarms of sensitive protected health data stored in state PDMP databases. This widespread law enforcement prescribing surveillance tactic, which reveals highly personal health information, including, among other things, patients’ contraceptive histories, gender transition decisions, and HIV diagnoses, raises serious constitutional privacy concerns. The Supreme Court’s recent Fourth Amendment decision, Carpenter v. United States, however, may limit law enforcement’s ability to continue to access droves of electronically-stored patient prescribing-related PHI in the custody of a state regulatory agency without a court order supported by probable cause. The Court’s decision in Carpenter already has been heralded as “a landmark privacy case,” which this article uniquely applies to prescription drug monitoring and law enforcement surveillance tactics provoked by the U.S. overdose crisis and its dominant narrative. Carpenter and the Fourth Amendment doctrines central to its holding motivate this article and animate its two core contentions. First, this article maintains that pertinent pre-Carpenter precedent requires the DEA to obtain a Fourth Amendment warrant in order to conduct sweeps of state PDMP databases searching patient protected health information. It then posits that courts are even more likely to rule that warrantless DEA searches of sensitive and frequently revealing health care data run afoul of the Fourth Amendment in the post-Carpenter world. Simply stated, PDMP protected health information is entitle","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"69 1","pages":"775-853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43360156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The Promising Viral Threat to Bacterial Resistance: the Uncertain Patentability of Phage Therapeutics and the Necessity of Alternative Incentives. 有希望的病毒对细菌耐药性的威胁:噬菌体治疗的不确定可专利性和替代激励的必要性。
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Kelly Todd

Bacteriophages, or "phages," are a category of highly adept and adaptable viruses that can infect and kill bacteria. With concerns over the burgeoning antibiotic-resistance crisis looming in recent years, scientists and policymakers have expressed a growing interest in developing novel treatments for bacterial infections that utilize bacteriophages. Because of the great expense associated with bringing a new drug to market, patents are usually considered the gold standard for incentivizing research and development in the pharmaceutical field. Absent such strong protection for a developer’s front end investment, pharmaceutical development remains financially risky and unattractive. Unfortunately, recent Supreme Court jurisprudence analyzing patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. subsection 101 has cast doubt on whether phage therapeutics would be eligible for strong patent protection. In order for the promise of phage therapeutics to become a reality, alternative protections or incentives are likely necessary. Such a framework would likely include trade secrecy, regulatory exclusivities, research support, alternative payment models, or some combination thereof.

噬菌体,或“噬菌体”,是一类高度熟练和适应性强的病毒,可以感染和杀死细菌。近年来,随着人们对日益严重的抗生素耐药性危机的担忧,科学家和政策制定者对开发利用噬菌体治疗细菌感染的新疗法表达了越来越大的兴趣。由于将新药推向市场所需的巨大费用,专利通常被认为是激励制药领域研究和开发的黄金标准。如果没有对开发商的前端投资提供如此强有力的保护,制药开发在财务上仍然存在风险和吸引力。不幸的是,最近最高法院根据35 U.S.C.第101条分析可专利主题的判例对噬菌体疗法是否有资格获得强有力的专利保护提出了质疑。为了使噬菌体疗法的前景成为现实,可能需要其他保护或激励措施。这样的框架可能包括商业保密、监管排他性、研究支持、替代支付模式,或它们的某种组合。
{"title":"The Promising Viral Threat to Bacterial Resistance: the Uncertain Patentability of Phage Therapeutics and the Necessity of Alternative Incentives.","authors":"Kelly Todd","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacteriophages, or \"phages,\" are a category of highly adept and adaptable viruses that can infect and kill bacteria. With concerns over the burgeoning antibiotic-resistance crisis looming in recent years, scientists and policymakers have expressed a growing interest in developing novel treatments for bacterial infections that utilize bacteriophages. Because of the great expense associated with bringing a new drug to market, patents are usually considered the gold standard for incentivizing research and development in the pharmaceutical field. Absent such strong protection for a developer’s front end investment, pharmaceutical development remains financially risky and unattractive. Unfortunately, recent Supreme Court jurisprudence analyzing patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. subsection 101 has cast doubt on whether phage therapeutics would be eligible for strong patent protection. In order for the promise of phage therapeutics to become a reality, alternative protections or incentives are likely necessary. Such a framework would likely include trade secrecy, regulatory exclusivities, research support, alternative payment models, or some combination thereof.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"68 4","pages":"767-805"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36869531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deviancy, Dependency, and Disability: the Forgotten History of Eugenics and Mass Incarceration. 离经叛道、依赖和残疾:被遗忘的优生学和大规模监禁的历史。
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2018-12-01
Laura I Appleman

Three widely discussed explanations of the punitive carceral state are racism, harsh drug laws, and prosecutorial overreach. These three narratives, however, only partially explain how our correctional system expanded to its current overcrowded state. Neglected in our discussion of mass incarceration is our largely forgotten history of the long-term, wholesale institutionalization of the disabled. This form of mass detention, motivated by a continuing application of eugenics and persistent class-based discrimination, is an important part of our history of imprisonment, one that has shaped key contours of our current supersized correctional system. Only by fully exploring this forgotten narrative of long-term detention and isolation will policy makers be able to understand, diagnose, and solve the crisis of mass incarceration.

人们广泛讨论的对惩罚性监禁国家的三个解释是种族主义、严厉的毒品法律和检察官越权。然而,这三种说法只能部分解释我们的惩教系统是如何扩大到目前人满为患的状态的。在我们对大规模监禁的讨论中,被忽视的是我们基本上被遗忘的长期、大规模的残疾人机构化历史。这种大规模拘留的动机是优生学的持续应用和持续的阶级歧视,是我们监禁历史的一个重要组成部分,它塑造了我们目前超大规模的惩教系统的关键轮廓。只有充分探索这种被遗忘的长期拘留和隔离的叙述,政策制定者才能理解、诊断和解决大规模监禁的危机。
{"title":"Deviancy, Dependency, and Disability: the Forgotten History of Eugenics and Mass Incarceration.","authors":"Laura I Appleman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three widely discussed explanations of the punitive carceral state are racism, harsh drug laws, and prosecutorial overreach. These three narratives, however, only partially explain how our correctional system expanded to its current overcrowded state. Neglected in our discussion of mass incarceration is our largely forgotten history of the long-term, wholesale institutionalization of the disabled. This form of mass detention, motivated by a continuing application of eugenics and persistent class-based discrimination, is an important part of our history of imprisonment, one that has shaped key contours of our current supersized correctional system. Only by fully exploring this forgotten narrative of long-term detention and isolation will policy makers be able to understand, diagnose, and solve the crisis of mass incarceration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"417-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36789419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sludge and Ordeals 污泥与磨难
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2018-11-20 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3288192
C. Sunstein
In 2015, the United States government imposed 9.78 billion hours of paperwork burdens on the American people. Many of these hours are best categorized as “sludge,” reducing access to important licenses, programs, and benefits. Because of the sheer costs of sludge, rational people are effectively denied life-changing goods and services; the problem is compounded by the existence of behavioral biases, including inertia, present bias, and unrealistic optimism. In principle, a serious deregulatory effort should be undertaken to reduce sludge, through automatic enrollment, greatly simplified forms, and reminders. At the same time, sludge can promote legitimate goals. First, it can protect program integrity, which means that policymakers might have to make difficult tradeoffs between (1) granting benefits to people who are not entitled to them and (2) denying benefits to people who are entitled to them. Second, it can overcome impulsivity, recklessness, and self-control problems. Third, it can prevent intrusions on privacy. Fourth, it can serve as a rationing device, ensuring that benefits go to people who most need them. In most cases, these defenses of sludge turn out to be more attractive in principle than in practice. For sludge, a form of cost-benefit analysis is essential, and it will often argue in favor of a neglected form of deregulation: sludge reduction. For both public and private institutions,“Sludge Audits” should become routine. Various suggestions are offered for new action by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which oversees the Paperwork Reduction Act; for courts; and for Congress.
2015年,美国政府给美国人民带来了97.8亿小时的文书工作负担。其中许多时间最好被归类为“污泥”,从而减少了获得重要许可证、项目和福利的机会。由于污泥的纯粹成本,理性的人实际上被剥夺了改变生活的商品和服务;行为偏见的存在加剧了这个问题,包括惰性、当前偏见和不切实际的乐观主义。原则上,应采取认真的放松管制措施,通过自动登记、大幅简化表格和提醒来减少污泥。同时,污泥可以促进合法的目标。首先,它可以保护计划的完整性,这意味着政策制定者可能不得不在(1)向无权享受福利的人发放福利和(2)拒绝向有权享受福利的人们发放福利之间做出艰难的权衡。其次,它可以克服冲动、鲁莽和自我控制的问题。第三,它可以防止侵犯隐私。第四,它可以作为一种配给装置,确保福利惠及最需要的人。在大多数情况下,污泥的这些防御措施在原则上比在实践中更有吸引力。对于污泥,一种形式的成本效益分析是必不可少的,它经常会支持一种被忽视的放松管制形式:污泥减少。对于公共和私营机构来说,“污泥审计”应该成为惯例。为监督《减少文书工作法》的信息和监管事务办公室采取新行动提出了各种建议;法院;以及国会。
{"title":"Sludge and Ordeals","authors":"C. Sunstein","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3288192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3288192","url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, the United States government imposed 9.78 billion hours of paperwork burdens on the American people. Many of these hours are best categorized as “sludge,” reducing access to important licenses, programs, and benefits. Because of the sheer costs of sludge, rational people are effectively denied life-changing goods and services; the problem is compounded by the existence of behavioral biases, including inertia, present bias, and unrealistic optimism. In principle, a serious deregulatory effort should be undertaken to reduce sludge, through automatic enrollment, greatly simplified forms, and reminders. At the same time, sludge can promote legitimate goals. First, it can protect program integrity, which means that policymakers might have to make difficult tradeoffs between (1) granting benefits to people who are not entitled to them and (2) denying benefits to people who are entitled to them. Second, it can overcome impulsivity, recklessness, and self-control problems. Third, it can prevent intrusions on privacy. Fourth, it can serve as a rationing device, ensuring that benefits go to people who most need them. In most cases, these defenses of sludge turn out to be more attractive in principle than in practice. For sludge, a form of cost-benefit analysis is essential, and it will often argue in favor of a neglected form of deregulation: sludge reduction. For both public and private institutions,“Sludge Audits” should become routine. Various suggestions are offered for new action by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which oversees the Paperwork Reduction Act; for courts; and for Congress.","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"1843-1883"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.3288192","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48508265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
Legitimate Yet Manipulative: The Conundrum of Open-Market Manipulation 合法而又操纵:公开市场操纵的难题
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3155504
G. Fletcher
Is manipulation possible in the absence of misconduct? This is the foundational inquiry at the heart of open-market manipulation. Open-market manipulation captures the attention of lawmakers and courts because it is market manipulation effected entirely through facially legitimate transactions. Whereas traditional, well-accepted forms of market manipulation involve deception, fraud, and monopolistic prices, open-market manipulation involves no objectively bad acts and, instead, is accomplished through permissible transactions executed on the open market. As enforcement of this form of manipulation increases, the question arises—when, if ever, is a legitimate transaction manipulative? To the Securities Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“the Commissions”), the answer is simple—legitimate transactions are manipulative if the trader intends to manipulate the market. The Commissions’ enforcement actions are based on the theory that the manipulative intent of the trader is sufficient to transform otherwise legitimate transactions into open-market manipulation. But this approach is fundamentally flawed. Traders may be treated differently for the same conduct under this approach, and it leaves market actors none the wiser as to when their conduct may be considered manipulative. Indeed, the Commissions’ intent-focused approach only exacerbates the chaos that currently surrounds the law of market manipulation and makes enforcement against open-market manipulation less effective. This Article is the first in-depth analysis of the concept of open-market manipulation, and it finds the Commissions’ approach to be sorely lacking. While the Commissions are correct to conclude that facially legitimate transactions may be manipulative, the intent-centric model is untenable. Intent is an insufficient tool in identifying open-market manipulation because it does not address the most important aspect of open-market manipulation—how open-market transactions harm the markets. Thus, this Article argues that Courts and regulators should, instead, coherently identify the necessary conditions under which open-market transactions are harmful to the markets. Specifically, this Article argues that only those open-market transactions that impede the markets’ efficiency and undermine their integrity should be deemed manipulative. Linking the theory of open-market manipulation to the purpose of anti-manipulation laws would provide the Commissions with more cogent principles on which to hold manipulators liable for their seemingly legitimate transactions.
在没有不当行为的情况下,操纵是可能的吗?这是公开市场操纵的核心问题。公开市场操纵引起了立法者和法院的注意,因为它完全是通过表面上合法的交易实现的市场操纵。传统的、被广泛接受的市场操纵形式涉及欺骗、欺诈和垄断价格,而公开市场操纵在客观上不涉及不良行为,而是通过在公开市场上执行的允许交易来实现的。随着这种操纵形式的强制执行的增加,问题出现了——什么时候,如果有的话,合法的交易是操纵的?对证券交易委员会和商品期货交易委员会(“委员会”)来说,答案很简单——如果交易者有意操纵市场,合法交易就是操纵交易。委员会的执法行动基于这样一种理论,即交易者的操纵意图足以将原本合法的交易转变为公开市场操纵。但这种方法从根本上是有缺陷的。在这种方法下,交易者可能会因同样的行为而受到不同的对待,这让市场参与者不知道他们的行为何时可能被视为操纵行为。事实上,欧盟委员会以意图为中心的做法只会加剧目前围绕市场操纵法的混乱,并降低对公开市场操纵的执法效率。本文是对公开市场操纵概念的第一次深入分析,它发现委员会的方法非常缺乏。虽然委员会得出表面上合法的交易可能存在操纵的结论是正确的,但以意图为中心的模型是站不住脚的。意图在识别公开市场操纵方面是一个不够充分的工具,因为它没有解决公开市场操纵最重要的方面——公开市场交易是如何损害市场的。因此,本文认为,法院和监管机构应该一致地确定公开市场交易对市场有害的必要条件。具体来说,本文认为只有那些阻碍市场效率和破坏其完整性的公开市场交易才应被视为操纵。将公开市场操纵理论与反操纵法的目的联系起来,将为委员会提供更有说服力的原则,使操纵者对其看似合法的交易负责。
{"title":"Legitimate Yet Manipulative: The Conundrum of Open-Market Manipulation","authors":"G. Fletcher","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3155504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3155504","url":null,"abstract":"Is manipulation possible in the absence of misconduct? This is the foundational inquiry at the heart of open-market manipulation. Open-market manipulation captures the attention of lawmakers and courts because it is market manipulation effected entirely through facially legitimate transactions. Whereas traditional, well-accepted forms of market manipulation involve deception, fraud, and monopolistic prices, open-market manipulation involves no objectively bad acts and, instead, is accomplished through permissible transactions executed on the open market. As enforcement of this form of manipulation increases, the question arises—when, if ever, is a legitimate transaction manipulative? \u0000 \u0000To the Securities Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“the Commissions”), the answer is simple—legitimate transactions are manipulative if the trader intends to manipulate the market. The Commissions’ enforcement actions are based on the theory that the manipulative intent of the trader is sufficient to transform otherwise legitimate transactions into open-market manipulation. But this approach is fundamentally flawed. Traders may be treated differently for the same conduct under this approach, and it leaves market actors none the wiser as to when their conduct may be considered manipulative. Indeed, the Commissions’ intent-focused approach only exacerbates the chaos that currently surrounds the law of market manipulation and makes enforcement against open-market manipulation less effective. \u0000 \u0000This Article is the first in-depth analysis of the concept of open-market manipulation, and it finds the Commissions’ approach to be sorely lacking. While the Commissions are correct to conclude that facially legitimate transactions may be manipulative, the intent-centric model is untenable. Intent is an insufficient tool in identifying open-market manipulation because it does not address the most important aspect of open-market manipulation—how open-market transactions harm the markets. Thus, this Article argues that Courts and regulators should, instead, coherently identify the necessary conditions under which open-market transactions are harmful to the markets. Specifically, this Article argues that only those open-market transactions that impede the markets’ efficiency and undermine their integrity should be deemed manipulative. Linking the theory of open-market manipulation to the purpose of anti-manipulation laws would provide the Commissions with more cogent principles on which to hold manipulators liable for their seemingly legitimate transactions.","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"479-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.3155504","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44955984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence. 暴力分娩:将分娩过程中的强迫程序重新定义为产科暴力。
IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Maria TR Borges

In the United States, women are routinely forced to undergo cesarean sections, episiotomies, and the use of forceps, despite their desire to attempt natural vaginal delivery. Yet, the current American legal system does little to provide redress for women coerced to undergo certain medical procedures during childbirth. Courts and physicians alike are prepared to override a woman's choice of childbirth procedure if they believe this choice poses risks to the fetus, and both give little value to the woman's right to bodily autonomy. This Note proposes a solution for addressing the problem of coerced medical procedures during childbirth by importing a framework created in Venezuela and Argentina that characterizes this issue as "obstetric violence." First, this Note contains an overview of the shortcomings of the existing American legal framework to address the problem. Second, it explains the advantages of the obstetric violence framework and argues that its adoption in the United States would address many of the failures of the existing system. And third, this Note introduces a few legislative and litigation strategies that can be used to implement this framework in the United States and briefly addresses some of the challenges these strategies may pose.

在美国,尽管妇女希望自然阴道分娩,但她们通常被迫接受剖宫产、外阴切开术和使用产钳。然而,目前的美国法律体系几乎没有为在分娩过程中被迫接受某些医疗程序的妇女提供赔偿。如果法院和医生认为妇女选择的分娩程序对胎儿有风险,他们都准备推翻妇女选择的分娩程序,而且两者都不重视妇女的身体自主权。本说明提出了一种解决办法,通过引进委内瑞拉和阿根廷创建的框架,将这一问题定性为"产科暴力",来解决分娩期间的强迫医疗程序问题。首先,本说明概述了解决这一问题的现行美国法律框架的缺点。其次,它解释了产科暴力框架的优势,并认为在美国采用该框架将解决现有体系的许多缺陷。第三,本说明介绍了一些可用于在美国实施这一框架的立法和诉讼策略,并简要介绍了这些策略可能带来的一些挑战。
{"title":"A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence.","authors":"Maria TR Borges","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, women are routinely forced to undergo cesarean sections, episiotomies, and the use of forceps, despite their desire to attempt natural vaginal delivery. Yet, the current American legal system does little to provide redress for women coerced to undergo certain medical procedures during childbirth. Courts and physicians alike are prepared to override a woman's choice of childbirth procedure if they believe this choice poses risks to the fetus, and both give little value to the woman's right to bodily autonomy. This Note proposes a solution for addressing the problem of coerced medical procedures during childbirth by importing a framework created in Venezuela and Argentina that characterizes this issue as \"obstetric violence.\" First, this Note contains an overview of the shortcomings of the existing American legal framework to address the problem. Second, it explains the advantages of the obstetric violence framework and argues that its adoption in the United States would address many of the failures of the existing system. And third, this Note introduces a few legislative and litigation strategies that can be used to implement this framework in the United States and briefly addresses some of the challenges these strategies may pose.</p>","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"67 4","pages":"827-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35854123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Duke Law Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1