Techno -economy of lithic raw materials in Piedmont (north-western Italy). A first life-like scenario

IF 1.1 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Lithic Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.2218/jls.7322
Sara Daffara, G. Berruti, Sandro Caracausi, Maite García‐Rojas, M. Arzarello
{"title":"Techno -economy of lithic raw materials in Piedmont (north-western Italy). A first life-like scenario","authors":"Sara Daffara, G. Berruti, Sandro Caracausi, Maite García‐Rojas, M. Arzarello","doi":"10.2218/jls.7322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data about Palaeolithic peopling, settlement dynamics and techno-economy of the south-western margin of the Alpine region are sketchy. In this area, the lack of systematic research and the scarcity of lithic raw materials, spread the idea that Piedmont was not inhabited during Palaeolithic. In 2009, the re-starting of the excavations at the Ciota Ciara cave, gave rise to new questions and to the development of research projects at a regional scale. \nThe Ciota Ciara cave is the only Middle Palaeolithic site object of multidisciplinary and systematic investigations. Its lithic assemblage, analysed through a techno-economic approach, allows to understand in detail the technological choices and the land mobility of the Neanderthal groups on a local and sub-regional scale. Other Middle Palaeolithic assemblages are known in the region and are all issued from surface collections. They come from the northern part of the region, from Vaude Canavesane, Trino, Baragge biellesi and Colline Novaresi. The technological study of these assemblages led to the identification of strong similarities in the technological choices of the Middle Palaeolithic human groups: they based their technology on the exploitation of vein quartz, a rock diffused all over the regional territory, from time to time accompanied by other local (spongolite, rhyolite, metamorphic rocks, jasper) and allochthonous (radiolarite and flint) lithic resources, with technological adaptation to their quality and mechanical properties both when it comes to predetermined methods (Levallois and discoid) and when expedient reduction sequences are used. Concerning Upper Palaeolithic, the only lithic assemblage issued from an archaeological excavation (and therefore with a clear stratigraphic context) is that from the Epigravettian site of Castelletto Ticino. Other lithic artefacts referable on a techno-typological basis to Upper Palaeolithic are from Trino and Colline Novaresi. As for Middle Palaeolithic, the techno-economic approach used in the analysis of these lithic assemblages, allow to have, for the first time, reliable data at a regional scale. \nIn this work we present the data obtained after about ten years of research in Piedmont: they outline a scenario where, even in the limits of analysis mostly based on materials issued from surface collections, we can see both clear differences between the Middle and the Upper Palaeolithic technological behaviours and hypothesise the land mobility of the hunter-gatherers’ groups that inhabited the region.","PeriodicalId":44072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lithic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lithic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.7322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data about Palaeolithic peopling, settlement dynamics and techno-economy of the south-western margin of the Alpine region are sketchy. In this area, the lack of systematic research and the scarcity of lithic raw materials, spread the idea that Piedmont was not inhabited during Palaeolithic. In 2009, the re-starting of the excavations at the Ciota Ciara cave, gave rise to new questions and to the development of research projects at a regional scale. The Ciota Ciara cave is the only Middle Palaeolithic site object of multidisciplinary and systematic investigations. Its lithic assemblage, analysed through a techno-economic approach, allows to understand in detail the technological choices and the land mobility of the Neanderthal groups on a local and sub-regional scale. Other Middle Palaeolithic assemblages are known in the region and are all issued from surface collections. They come from the northern part of the region, from Vaude Canavesane, Trino, Baragge biellesi and Colline Novaresi. The technological study of these assemblages led to the identification of strong similarities in the technological choices of the Middle Palaeolithic human groups: they based their technology on the exploitation of vein quartz, a rock diffused all over the regional territory, from time to time accompanied by other local (spongolite, rhyolite, metamorphic rocks, jasper) and allochthonous (radiolarite and flint) lithic resources, with technological adaptation to their quality and mechanical properties both when it comes to predetermined methods (Levallois and discoid) and when expedient reduction sequences are used. Concerning Upper Palaeolithic, the only lithic assemblage issued from an archaeological excavation (and therefore with a clear stratigraphic context) is that from the Epigravettian site of Castelletto Ticino. Other lithic artefacts referable on a techno-typological basis to Upper Palaeolithic are from Trino and Colline Novaresi. As for Middle Palaeolithic, the techno-economic approach used in the analysis of these lithic assemblages, allow to have, for the first time, reliable data at a regional scale. In this work we present the data obtained after about ten years of research in Piedmont: they outline a scenario where, even in the limits of analysis mostly based on materials issued from surface collections, we can see both clear differences between the Middle and the Upper Palaeolithic technological behaviours and hypothesise the land mobility of the hunter-gatherers’ groups that inhabited the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮埃蒙特(意大利西北部)石料原料的技术经济。第一个逼真的场景
关于高寒地区西南缘旧石器时代人口、定居动态和技术经济的资料较为粗略。在这一地区,由于缺乏系统的研究和石器原料的稀缺,旧石器时代皮埃蒙特没有人居住的观点广为传播。2009年,Ciota Ciara洞穴的发掘工作重新开始,引发了新的问题,并推动了区域范围内研究项目的发展。Ciota Ciara洞穴是唯一对中旧石器时代遗址进行多学科和系统调查的对象。通过技术经济方法分析其岩石组合,可以详细了解尼安德特人群体在当地和次区域范围内的技术选择和土地流动性。在该地区已知的其他中旧石器时代的组合都来自地面收集。他们来自该地区的北部,来自Vaude Canavesane, Trino, Baragge biellesi和Colline Novaresi。对这些组合的技术研究表明,在旧石器时代中期人类群体的技术选择上有很强的相似性:他们的技术基于脉状石英的开采,脉状石英是一种分布在整个区域的岩石,有时伴随着其他本地(海绵岩、流纹岩、变质岩、碧玉)和异域(放射石和燧石)的岩石资源,无论是在预定的方法(勒瓦卢瓦和盘状)还是在使用有利的还原序列时,都对其质量和力学特性进行了技术适应。关于旧石器时代晚期,唯一来自考古发掘(因此具有明确的地层背景)的岩石组合是来自提契诺城堡的埃皮格拉韦特遗址。在技术类型学基础上可参考旧石器时代晚期的其他石器人工制品是来自特里诺和科林诺瓦雷西。至于旧石器时代中期,在分析这些石器组合时使用的技术经济方法,第一次允许在区域范围内获得可靠的数据。在这项工作中,我们展示了在皮埃蒙特大约十年的研究后获得的数据:他们概述了一个场景,即使在主要基于地面收集的材料的分析的限制下,我们也可以看到旧石器时代中期和晚期技术行为之间的明显差异,并假设居住在该地区的狩猎采集者群体的土地流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishing a new workflow in the study of core reduction intensity and distribution Obsidian Lithic Technology, Chaîne Opératoire and Symbolic Meaning in the Northern Hualfín Valley (Northwest Argentina) during Late - Inka Period Techno -economy of lithic raw materials in Piedmont (north-western Italy). A first life-like scenario Cal Sitjo: A new Mesolithic to Neolithic sequence in a chert-rich region (Sant Martí de Tous, NE Iberia) What lies in between: Levallois, discoid and intermediate methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1