THE TEACHING OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) IN MALAYSIAN SCHOOLS: POLICY AND PRACTICES

Tiew Chia Chun, Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah
{"title":"THE TEACHING OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) IN MALAYSIAN SCHOOLS: POLICY AND PRACTICES","authors":"Tiew Chia Chun, Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah","doi":"10.22452/mojem.vol7no3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a move towards educational transformation, the Ministry of Education (MOE) has established a policy on the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and its practices are being emphasized throughout Malaysian education system. However, due to a lack of meta-analysis, the types of pedagogical practices used by teachers in enhancing students’ HOTS in the local context is unclear. This study used a meta-analytical approach to fill in the gap in literature on the pedagogical practices of HOTS in Malaysian classrooms. A total of 32 empirical studies were included in the analyses. Therefore, this paper aims at synthesising the pedagogical practices of teaching HOTS among Malaysian teachers. The findings offered a synthesis of HOTS pedagogical practices employed by teachers in Malaysian schools, which could be categorised as practices that promote and practices that inhibit the teaching of HOTS. The synthesis revealed that some practices that promoted the teaching of HOTS were brainstorming, constructivist learning, inquiry teaching, thinking map, and problem-based learning whereas some practices that inhibited the teaching of HOTS were teacher-centered learning and teaching lower-order thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":37473,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol7no3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

As a move towards educational transformation, the Ministry of Education (MOE) has established a policy on the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and its practices are being emphasized throughout Malaysian education system. However, due to a lack of meta-analysis, the types of pedagogical practices used by teachers in enhancing students’ HOTS in the local context is unclear. This study used a meta-analytical approach to fill in the gap in literature on the pedagogical practices of HOTS in Malaysian classrooms. A total of 32 empirical studies were included in the analyses. Therefore, this paper aims at synthesising the pedagogical practices of teaching HOTS among Malaysian teachers. The findings offered a synthesis of HOTS pedagogical practices employed by teachers in Malaysian schools, which could be categorised as practices that promote and practices that inhibit the teaching of HOTS. The synthesis revealed that some practices that promoted the teaching of HOTS were brainstorming, constructivist learning, inquiry teaching, thinking map, and problem-based learning whereas some practices that inhibited the teaching of HOTS were teacher-centered learning and teaching lower-order thinking skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚学校高等思维技能的教学:政策与实践
作为教育转型的一项举措,教育部(MOE)已经制定了一项关于高等思维技能(HOTS)教学的政策,其实践正在整个马来西亚教育系统中得到强调。然而,由于缺乏荟萃分析,教师在当地背景下提高学生HOTS的教学实践类型尚不清楚。本研究使用元分析方法来填补马来西亚课堂上HOTS教学实践的文献空白。本研究共纳入32项实证研究。因此,本文旨在综合马来西亚教师教学HOTS的教学实践。调查结果提供了马来西亚学校教师采用的HOTS教学实践的综合,这些实践可以分为促进HOTS教学的实践和抑制HOTS教学的实践。综合研究发现,头脑风暴、建构主义学习、探究性教学、思维图和问题型学习是促进HOTS教学的实践,而以教师为中心的学习和低阶思维技能的教学是抑制HOTS教学的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Educational Management is interested in features manuscripts concerning recent research and developments, professional issues, administrative and leadership concerns, and creative strategies and policies to improve educational management. MOJEM publishes original contributions on educational management , administration and leadership in the widest sense: on the management planning, policy decisions, finance, human recourse development, organizational behavior, change management and alternatives in schools as well as further and higher education institutions. By promoting critical discussion on current innovations within these areas, the journal represents an excellent forum for highlighting the profile of educational management on both a national and international level. MOJEM covers the recent research and practices on key debates and controversies within the broad field of educational management planning and policy. The journal also blends the best of educational research and practice, making it a valuable resource for educators, management, policy makers, administrators, researchers, teachers, and post graduate students. Anyone in the profession of educational management may submit her/his manuscript(s) for publication consideration in MOJEM. All submission will be double-blind reviewe by at least two professional reviewers with expertise in the relevant areas . Articles may be contributed at any time for publication consideration.
期刊最新文献
THE PRINCIPAL’S TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP APPROACH BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM IN STRENGTHENING THE CHARACTER OF STUDENTS THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE ON ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP SKILLS AND STUDENTS’ SKILL-BASED LEARNING OUTCOMES IN SAUDI HIGHER EDUCATION FACTORS AFFECTING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LIFELONG LEARNING IN INDONESIA AN INVESTIGATION INTO ISSUES IMPEDING HIGHER EDUCATION EFFECTIVENESS IN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES PERCEPTUAL GAP AMONG CORPORATE WORLD, ACADEMICS AND STUDENTS: PERSONAL QUALITIES AND EMPLOYABILITY COMPETENCIES OF STUDENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1