Clitic-verb non-adjacency and the inertial theory of grammatical change: evidence from the history of European Portuguese

Q3 Arts and Humanities Lingua Posnaniensis Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.2478/linpo-2019-0006
M. Nkollo
{"title":"Clitic-verb non-adjacency and the inertial theory of grammatical change: evidence from the history of European Portuguese","authors":"M. Nkollo","doi":"10.2478/linpo-2019-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although clitic-verb non-adjacency is a minor linear pattern in contemporary European Portuguese (EP), it showed a significant frequency in the Classical and early Modern eras. The aims of the study are twofold. First, an attempt is made to pinpoint the contribution of the cl-X-verb model to the non-morphological attachment of proclitics to their verbal hosts in present-day EP. By means of a corpus analysis conducted in the 17th through 19th century texts, clitic-verb non-adjacency is demonstrated to have helped eliminate clitic -specific allomorphy in the preverbal domain. Its precise role consisted in preventing proclitics from being integrated into their hosts. The second aim is to see how this diagnosis fits in with the inertial model of grammatical change. In line with Longobardi’s proposal (2001), innovation in the syntactic processing of preverbal pronouns is claimed to have come about as a side-effect of the changes in more peripheral modules of grammar, i.e. in phonology and morphology.","PeriodicalId":35103,"journal":{"name":"Lingua Posnaniensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua Posnaniensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2019-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although clitic-verb non-adjacency is a minor linear pattern in contemporary European Portuguese (EP), it showed a significant frequency in the Classical and early Modern eras. The aims of the study are twofold. First, an attempt is made to pinpoint the contribution of the cl-X-verb model to the non-morphological attachment of proclitics to their verbal hosts in present-day EP. By means of a corpus analysis conducted in the 17th through 19th century texts, clitic-verb non-adjacency is demonstrated to have helped eliminate clitic -specific allomorphy in the preverbal domain. Its precise role consisted in preventing proclitics from being integrated into their hosts. The second aim is to see how this diagnosis fits in with the inertial model of grammatical change. In line with Longobardi’s proposal (2001), innovation in the syntactic processing of preverbal pronouns is claimed to have come about as a side-effect of the changes in more peripheral modules of grammar, i.e. in phonology and morphology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动词不邻接与语法变化的惯性理论:来自欧洲葡萄牙语历史的证据
摘要尽管在当代欧洲葡萄牙语中,集团动词非邻接是一种次要的线性模式,但在古典和现代早期,它表现出显著的频率。这项研究的目的有两个。首先,试图确定cl-X-verb模型对当今EP中前政治学者与其言语宿主的非形态依恋的贡献。通过对17至19世纪文本的语料库分析,证明了派系动词非邻接有助于消除前语域中的派系特定变体。它的确切作用是防止亲政治分子融入宿主。第二个目的是看看这种诊断如何符合语法变化的惯性模型。根据Longobardi(2001)的建议,语前代词句法处理的创新被认为是语法更外围模块(即音韵学和形态学)变化的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua Posnaniensis
Lingua Posnaniensis Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Temporal adverbial clauses: A cross-linguistic perspective Mubi-Toram lexicon and Afro-Asiatic IV: Addenda with *b- (Part 2) An Optimality-Theoretic analysis of stress in the Bani Sulaim dialect Angas-Sura etymologies XIII Mubi-Toram lexicon and Afro-Asiatic II: Addenda with *b-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1