Luxury, Voluptuousity, Levinas: on Jan Steen and Giovanni Segantini

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Luxury-History Culture Consumption Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/20511817.2022.2117665
J. Armitage
{"title":"Luxury, Voluptuousity, Levinas: on Jan Steen and Giovanni Segantini","authors":"J. Armitage","doi":"10.1080/20511817.2022.2117665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article deals with the concepts of luxury and voluptuousity, the abundant and the sensual, and their position in the history of art, for luxury and voluptuosity are rarely mentioned in single works of art by name. The article is an encounter with the history of art, particularly as it is manifested in two paintings that do at least reference luxury, the Golden Age Dutch artist Jan Steen’s Beware of Luxury (1633), and the Symbolist stateless artist Giovanni Segantini’s The Punishment of Luxury (1891). To understand Steen’s and Segantini’s conceptions of luxury and voluptuosity, and thus to build a foundation for an interpretation of their most important ideas regarding profligate and often exaggerated subjects and objects, it is argued that researchers can usefully explore Steen’s and Segantini’s engagement with luxury and voluptuousity from the perspective of French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas’ phenomenological explanations of art, knowledge, and ontology where these two concepts are appreciated not as aesthetic categories but as aspects of desire and happiness, need, the untouchable in human contact, and as the future in the present. Deliberating the wider philosophical implications of why luxury and voluptuosity are not continually invoked by artists and writers on art history, the article emphasizes their significance for contemporary American artists such as Jeff Koons and for contemporary art history whilst concluding that, whereas Levinas’ theorizations and interpretations of the relationship between luxury and voluptuousity are intellectually stimulating, they are also problematic because, it is suggested, luxury and voluptuousity are a continuum.","PeriodicalId":55901,"journal":{"name":"Luxury-History Culture Consumption","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Luxury-History Culture Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511817.2022.2117665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article deals with the concepts of luxury and voluptuousity, the abundant and the sensual, and their position in the history of art, for luxury and voluptuosity are rarely mentioned in single works of art by name. The article is an encounter with the history of art, particularly as it is manifested in two paintings that do at least reference luxury, the Golden Age Dutch artist Jan Steen’s Beware of Luxury (1633), and the Symbolist stateless artist Giovanni Segantini’s The Punishment of Luxury (1891). To understand Steen’s and Segantini’s conceptions of luxury and voluptuosity, and thus to build a foundation for an interpretation of their most important ideas regarding profligate and often exaggerated subjects and objects, it is argued that researchers can usefully explore Steen’s and Segantini’s engagement with luxury and voluptuousity from the perspective of French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas’ phenomenological explanations of art, knowledge, and ontology where these two concepts are appreciated not as aesthetic categories but as aspects of desire and happiness, need, the untouchable in human contact, and as the future in the present. Deliberating the wider philosophical implications of why luxury and voluptuosity are not continually invoked by artists and writers on art history, the article emphasizes their significance for contemporary American artists such as Jeff Koons and for contemporary art history whilst concluding that, whereas Levinas’ theorizations and interpretations of the relationship between luxury and voluptuousity are intellectually stimulating, they are also problematic because, it is suggested, luxury and voluptuousity are a continuum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奢华,性感,列维纳斯:简·斯蒂恩和乔瓦尼·塞甘蒂尼
摘要本文论述了奢侈与淫荡、丰盛与感官的概念,以及它们在艺术史上的地位,因为奢侈与淫荡在单个艺术作品中很少被提及。这篇文章是一次与艺术史的相遇,尤其是在两幅至少与奢侈品有关的画作中,黄金时代的荷兰艺术家Jan Steen的《当心奢侈品》(1633)和象征主义无国家艺术家Giovanni Segantini的《奢侈的惩罚》(1891)。为了理解Steen和Segantini关于奢侈和淫荡的概念,从而为解释他们关于挥霍和经常被夸大的主体和客体的最重要的思想奠定基础,研究者认为可以从法国哲学家Emmanuel Levinas对艺术、知识、艺术和艺术的现象学解释的角度来探索Steen和Segantini对奢侈和淫荡的参与。在本体论中,这两个概念不是作为美学范畴来欣赏而是作为欲望和幸福,需要,人类接触中不可触及的东西,以及现在的未来。考虑到为什么奢侈和淫荡没有被艺术史上的艺术家和作家不断引用这一更广泛的哲学含义,文章强调了它们对当代美国艺术家的意义,如杰夫·昆斯和当代艺术史,同时得出结论,尽管列维纳斯对奢侈和淫荡之间关系的理论和解释在理智上是刺激的,但它们也有问题,因为,有人认为,奢侈和性感是一个连续体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Luxury-History Culture Consumption
Luxury-History Culture Consumption HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
‘Brand Purpose’ in fashion and luxury brand management: A must or an opportunity? Tales of a state of mind, body and space: The quest for the next luxury Splitting the atom of heritage to respond to luxury’s challenges and crises ‘The luxury runs deep’: Which were the most luxurious cars of the 1970s? Curative handcrafted textiles: Healing generations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1