On the Intersectional Amplification of Barriers to College Internships: A Comparative Case Study Analysis

IF 2.6 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Harvard Educational Review Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.17763/1943-5045-91.4.457
M. Wolfgram, Brian D. Vivona, Tamanna Akram
{"title":"On the Intersectional Amplification of Barriers to College Internships: A Comparative Case Study Analysis","authors":"M. Wolfgram, Brian D. Vivona, Tamanna Akram","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-91.4.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, authors Matthew Wolfgram, Brian Vivona, and Tamanna Akram present a comparative case study analysis of five students from a comprehensive, urban Hispanic-Serving Institution whose experiences exemplify a coordination of intersectional factors that amplify barriers to internship participation. Research shows that college internships yield academic, economic, and professional benefits. However, the opportunity to locate and participate in internships is not equal across student demographic and socioeconomic contexts. There are multiple complex barriers to internship participation for students who are socially and institutionally minoritized by race, gender, and other contextual factors, including finances, work responsibilities, travel, and gendered familial obligations. These factors intersect with systems of power and privilege to amplify challenges and foreclose futures. The authors argue that the delineation of barriers into types alone, such as financial, social, and cultural, without additional analysis of the dynamics of how such barriers intersect and amplify, runs the risk of misconstruing students’ actual experiences when they struggle to access internships and other educational opportunities.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-91.4.457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this article, authors Matthew Wolfgram, Brian Vivona, and Tamanna Akram present a comparative case study analysis of five students from a comprehensive, urban Hispanic-Serving Institution whose experiences exemplify a coordination of intersectional factors that amplify barriers to internship participation. Research shows that college internships yield academic, economic, and professional benefits. However, the opportunity to locate and participate in internships is not equal across student demographic and socioeconomic contexts. There are multiple complex barriers to internship participation for students who are socially and institutionally minoritized by race, gender, and other contextual factors, including finances, work responsibilities, travel, and gendered familial obligations. These factors intersect with systems of power and privilege to amplify challenges and foreclose futures. The authors argue that the delineation of barriers into types alone, such as financial, social, and cultural, without additional analysis of the dynamics of how such barriers intersect and amplify, runs the risk of misconstruing students’ actual experiences when they struggle to access internships and other educational opportunities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高校实习障碍的交叉放大——比较案例分析
在这篇文章中,作者Matthew Wolfgram、Brian Vivona和Tamanna Akram对来自一所综合性城市西班牙裔服务机构的五名学生进行了比较案例分析,他们的经历证明了跨部门因素的协调,这些因素放大了实习参与的障碍。研究表明,大学实习会带来学术、经济和职业方面的好处。然而,在不同的学生人口和社会经济背景下,寻找和参与实习的机会并不平等。对于因种族、性别和其他背景因素(包括财务、工作责任、旅行和性别家庭义务)而在社会和制度上处于少数地位的学生来说,参与实习有多种复杂的障碍。这些因素与权力和特权体系相交叉,以扩大挑战并阻止未来。作者认为,仅将障碍划分为金融、社会和文化等类型,而不进一步分析这些障碍如何交叉和扩大的动态,就有可能误解学生在努力获得实习和其他教育机会时的实际经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Harvard Educational Review
Harvard Educational Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.
期刊最新文献
“Whatever You Want to Call It”: Science of Reading Mythologies in the Education Reform Movement Language and Education in Africa: A Fresh Approach to the Debates on Language, Education, and Cultural Identity, by Bert van Pinxteren From Democratic Participation to Cariño: Exploring the Core Commitments of Foundational Scholars in the Field of Youth Participatory Action Research What Relationships Do We Want with Technology? Toward Technoskepticism in Schools Expanding the Reasons We Give: Black Parents’ Collective Engagement as Resisting White Supremacy at School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1