Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY Advances in Human Biology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/aihb.aihb_122_21
N. Kulkarni, V. Shah
{"title":"Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey","authors":"N. Kulkarni, V. Shah","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_122_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aimed to assess the patients' subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers after completion of active orthodontic treatment. Objective: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions evaluated the patients' experience with bonded fixed lingual retainer. Materials and Methods: The content was validated by a group of seven experienced orthodontists. The questionnaire survey was run using Google Forms, responded by 45 (50.6%) males and 44 (49.4%) females between the ages ranging from 19 to 42 years. Their responses were rated on a Visual Analogue Scale as applicable. Cronbach's alpha test was utilised for assessing the reliability, and the Chi-square test was used for the quantitative variables. Results: 33.7% of individuals were most comfortable, and 2.2% had severe discomfort during retainer placement. 6.6% of individuals had severe difficulty maintaining oral hygiene in the upper arch and 4.4% in lower teeth and gums, respectively. 2.2% had severe difficulty in speech. 85.4% had no tongue ulceration. 37.1% of respondents had a very good overall experience with fixed bonded lingual retainer, 59.5% had mild problems and only 1.1% had severe problems with a very bad experience. Conclusions: The study concluded that the overall experience of respondents with fixed lingual bonded retainer had mild problems. It was comfortable for most of the patients in maintaining oral hygiene with mild difficulty in speech and chewing. The cause of failure of the retainer was mainly due to bond failure or broken wire in the retainer.","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"30 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_122_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to assess the patients' subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers after completion of active orthodontic treatment. Objective: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions evaluated the patients' experience with bonded fixed lingual retainer. Materials and Methods: The content was validated by a group of seven experienced orthodontists. The questionnaire survey was run using Google Forms, responded by 45 (50.6%) males and 44 (49.4%) females between the ages ranging from 19 to 42 years. Their responses were rated on a Visual Analogue Scale as applicable. Cronbach's alpha test was utilised for assessing the reliability, and the Chi-square test was used for the quantitative variables. Results: 33.7% of individuals were most comfortable, and 2.2% had severe discomfort during retainer placement. 6.6% of individuals had severe difficulty maintaining oral hygiene in the upper arch and 4.4% in lower teeth and gums, respectively. 2.2% had severe difficulty in speech. 85.4% had no tongue ulceration. 37.1% of respondents had a very good overall experience with fixed bonded lingual retainer, 59.5% had mild problems and only 1.1% had severe problems with a very bad experience. Conclusions: The study concluded that the overall experience of respondents with fixed lingual bonded retainer had mild problems. It was comfortable for most of the patients in maintaining oral hygiene with mild difficulty in speech and chewing. The cause of failure of the retainer was mainly due to bond failure or broken wire in the retainer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘接固定舌固位器的主观评价:问卷调查
目的:本研究旨在评估患者在完成主动正畸治疗后对粘接固定舌固位器的主观评价。目的:通过11个问题的问卷调查,评价粘接固定舌固位器患者的使用体验。材料和方法:内容由七名经验丰富的正畸医师进行验证。问卷调查采用谷歌表格,年龄19 ~ 42岁,男性45人(50.6%),女性44人(49.4%)。根据适用的视觉模拟量表对他们的反应进行评分。信度采用Cronbach’s alpha检验,定量变量采用卡方检验。结果:33.7%的人在固位器放置过程中感到最舒适,2.2%的人在固位器放置过程中感到严重不适。6.6%的人在上牙弓和4.4%的人在下牙和牙龈有严重的口腔卫生困难。2.2%有严重的言语困难。85.4%患者舌部无溃疡。37.1%的受访者对固定粘接舌固位器的整体体验非常好,59.5%的受访者有轻微的问题,只有1.1%的受访者有严重的问题,体验非常差。结论:本研究的结论是,受访者使用固定舌结合固位器的整体体验有轻微的问题。大部分患者保持口腔卫生舒适,言语和咀嚼有轻微困难。固位器失效的原因主要是固位器粘结失效或断丝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the Efficacy of Natural and Synthetic Folic Acid on Human Health and Looking into a Better Alternative Effective Programmes to Reduce Inappropriate Dispensing of Antibiotics in Community Pharmacies Especially in Developing Countries Dengue Dynamics: A Global Update Evaluation of invasive tumour front in primary and secondary oral squamous cell carcinoma – A reliable prognostic parameter Study of the cellular senescence process in human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1