Wirken Durch Anpassung: Eine Sprachphilosophische Erklärung Der Wirksamkeit Systemischer Fragen

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG Pub Date : 2022-06-15 DOI:10.3196/004433022835407168
Stefan Rinner
{"title":"Wirken Durch Anpassung: Eine Sprachphilosophische Erklärung Der Wirksamkeit Systemischer Fragen","authors":"Stefan Rinner","doi":"10.3196/004433022835407168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A central method of systemic therapy is the use of so called systemic questions. With these questions the therapist provides the client with an alternative and possibly less problematic description of reality. Since clients tend to tacitly accept these implicit offers by the therapist,\n systemic questions are often ascribed a \"hypnotic\" effect. In this paper, I will explain the \"hypnotic\" effect of systemic questions with the linguistic phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. For instance, in \"Scorekeeping in a Language Game\", David Lewis points out that speakers tend\n to tacitly accept the presuppositions of an utterance, because an utterance is only appropriate if its presuppositions are already part of common ground. Starting from this, I will argue with von Fintel's 'Hey, wait a minute' test that the implicit offers of systemic questions are nothing\n more than presuppositions of these questions. First, this will provide an explanation of the \"hypnotic\" effect of systemic question via the phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. In addition, it will explain how the implicit offers of systemic questions enable a new description of reality\n on the part of the client. In this way, the present paper is an example of how philosophy of language can be applied to problems outside of philosophy, providing further evidence that the research area of applied philosophy of language is real.","PeriodicalId":43672,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433022835407168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central method of systemic therapy is the use of so called systemic questions. With these questions the therapist provides the client with an alternative and possibly less problematic description of reality. Since clients tend to tacitly accept these implicit offers by the therapist, systemic questions are often ascribed a "hypnotic" effect. In this paper, I will explain the "hypnotic" effect of systemic questions with the linguistic phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. For instance, in "Scorekeeping in a Language Game", David Lewis points out that speakers tend to tacitly accept the presuppositions of an utterance, because an utterance is only appropriate if its presuppositions are already part of common ground. Starting from this, I will argue with von Fintel's 'Hey, wait a minute' test that the implicit offers of systemic questions are nothing more than presuppositions of these questions. First, this will provide an explanation of the "hypnotic" effect of systemic question via the phenomenon of presupposition accommodation. In addition, it will explain how the implicit offers of systemic questions enable a new description of reality on the part of the client. In this way, the present paper is an example of how philosophy of language can be applied to problems outside of philosophy, providing further evidence that the research area of applied philosophy of language is real.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过互动:用语言解释系统问题的作用
系统治疗的一个核心方法是使用所谓的系统性问题。通过这些问题,治疗师为客户提供了另一种可能问题较少的现实描述。由于客户倾向于默认治疗师的这些隐含提议,系统性问题通常被认为是“催眠”效果。在本文中,我将用预设顺应的语言学现象来解释系统性问题的“催眠”作用。例如,在《语言游戏中的记分》中,大卫·刘易斯指出,说话者倾向于默认话语的预设,因为只有当话语的预设已经是共同点的一部分时,话语才是合适的。从这一点开始,我将与冯·芬特尔的“嘿,等一下”测试争论,即系统性问题的隐含提供只不过是这些问题的预设。首先,这将通过预设调节现象来解释系统性问题的“催眠”效应。此外,它还将解释系统性问题的隐含提供如何使客户能够对现实进行新的描述。通过这种方式,本文是语言哲学如何应用于哲学之外的问题的一个例子,进一步证明了语言应用哲学的研究领域是真实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Mit diesem Doppelheft beginnt die Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung ihren 50. Jahrgang. Ihre Gründung im Frühjahr 1946 verdankt sie einem glücklichen Zusammenwirken. Die Initiative eines Münchner Philosophen aus Bulgarien verbindet sich mit dem Sachverstand namhafter Professoren, die damals noch aus ganz Deutschland, nicht nur dem Westen kommen. Ob er sie "nur" als Autoren oder zusätzlich für den Beirat der Redaktion gewinnt - von Anfang an versichert sich Georgi Schischkoff der Mitarbeit fast aller großen Namen der Zeit. Zunächst sind es etwa der Philosoph und Pädagoge Friedrich Bollnow, der Platon-Forscher Ernst Hoffmann, der Philosoph und Psychologe Philipp Lersch und die Philosophen Walter Bröcker und Wilhelm Weischedel.
期刊最新文献
Ebenen des philosophischen Textverstehens und ihre lesestrategische Bedeutung Die Autorinnen und Autoren dieses Heftes Schopenhauer über Seinsgründe Logik und Geschlecht? Empirische Daten zu Logikeinführungen im Philosophiestudium an deutschen Universitäten1 Replik zu den Kommentaren
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1