Investigation of attitudes toward death and hospice care in nursing students before internship

Wenli Xiao, Chun Li, Zhaoyang Dong, Lu Song, Bing Li, Min Cai, Yong-mei Lu
{"title":"Investigation of attitudes toward death and hospice care in nursing students before internship","authors":"Wenli Xiao, Chun Li, Zhaoyang Dong, Lu Song, Bing Li, Min Cai, Yong-mei Lu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2020.01.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate nursing students' attitudes toward death and hospice care before they start clinical practice, analyze the correlation between the two attitudes and compare their differences in junior and regular nursing college students. \n \n \nMethods \nA cross-sectional study was adopted to investigate the attitudes toward death and hospice care in 232 senior nursing students at school. Instruments included the Chinese version of the Death Attitude Profile-Revised (DAP-R) and the Chinese version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale-Form B (FATCOD-B). Pearson correlation analysis and independent t-test were used to analyze the data. \n \n \nResults \nThe mean scores of the 5 dimensions of death attitude were neutral acceptance (4.10±0.43), fear of death (2.76±0.66), death avoidance (2.73±0.74), approach acceptance (2.61±0.58), and escape acceptance (2.48±0.75), respectively. The total score of hospice care attitude was (107.63±8.45), which was negatively correlated with fear of death (r=-0.247, P<0.01), death avoidance (r=-0.278, P<0.01), and escape acceptance (r=-0.145, P<0.05) scores and positively correlated with neutral acceptance score (r=0.405, P<0.01). The death avoidance score of regular nursing college students was significantly lower than that of junior nursing college students (t=-2.043, P<0.05), and the hospice care attitude score of regular nursing college students was significantly higher that of junior nursing college students (t=2.639, P<0.01). \n \n \nConclusion \nThere is a big room to improve nursing students' attitudes toward death and hospice care. Strengthening end-of-life care education is imperative. \n \n \nKey words: \nHospice care; Death attitude; Education; Nursing; Students","PeriodicalId":56557,"journal":{"name":"中华医学教育探索杂志","volume":"19 1","pages":"106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学教育探索杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2020.01.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate nursing students' attitudes toward death and hospice care before they start clinical practice, analyze the correlation between the two attitudes and compare their differences in junior and regular nursing college students. Methods A cross-sectional study was adopted to investigate the attitudes toward death and hospice care in 232 senior nursing students at school. Instruments included the Chinese version of the Death Attitude Profile-Revised (DAP-R) and the Chinese version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale-Form B (FATCOD-B). Pearson correlation analysis and independent t-test were used to analyze the data. Results The mean scores of the 5 dimensions of death attitude were neutral acceptance (4.10±0.43), fear of death (2.76±0.66), death avoidance (2.73±0.74), approach acceptance (2.61±0.58), and escape acceptance (2.48±0.75), respectively. The total score of hospice care attitude was (107.63±8.45), which was negatively correlated with fear of death (r=-0.247, P<0.01), death avoidance (r=-0.278, P<0.01), and escape acceptance (r=-0.145, P<0.05) scores and positively correlated with neutral acceptance score (r=0.405, P<0.01). The death avoidance score of regular nursing college students was significantly lower than that of junior nursing college students (t=-2.043, P<0.05), and the hospice care attitude score of regular nursing college students was significantly higher that of junior nursing college students (t=2.639, P<0.01). Conclusion There is a big room to improve nursing students' attitudes toward death and hospice care. Strengthening end-of-life care education is imperative. Key words: Hospice care; Death attitude; Education; Nursing; Students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生实习前对死亡和临终关怀态度的调查
目的了解护生临床实习前对死亡和临终关怀的态度,分析这两种态度之间的相关性,并比较护生与普通护生的差异。方法采用横断面调查法,对232名在校护生的死亡态度和临终关怀态度进行调查。仪器包括中文版的死亡态度档案修订版(DAP-R)和中文版的Frommelt对死亡护理的态度量表B(FATCOD-B)。采用Pearson相关分析和独立t检验对数据进行分析。结果死亡态度5个维度的平均得分分别为中性接受(4.10±0.43)、死亡恐惧(2.76±0.66)、死亡回避(2.73±0.74)、接近接受(2.61±0.58)和逃避接受(2.48±0.75)。临终关怀态度总分为(107.63±8.45),与死亡恐惧(r=-0.247,P<0.01)、死亡回避(r=-0.278,P<0.01)呈负相关,普通护生的死亡回避得分显著低于专科护生(t=-2.043,P<0.05),普通护生的临终关怀态度得分显著高于专科护生(t=2.639,P<0.01)。加强临终关怀教育势在必行。关键词:临终关怀;死亡态度;教育;护理;学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5254
期刊最新文献
Application of formative evaluation based on Rain Classroom in clinical skills teaching Application of "micro-teaching assistant" interaction platform in the residents' standardized training of geriatrics department Enlightenment of Taiwan medical education model on standardized medical residency training in Mainland China Design of comprehensive nursing experiment project based on simulation technology for acute respiratory distress syndrome Problems and reflections on the construction of medical imaging technology specialty in affiliated hospitals of universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1