The Social Network: How Friends’ Online Behavior and Belongingness Needs Influence Political Activity

IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Policy and Internet Pub Date : 2020-04-29 DOI:10.1002/poi3.240
H. Bäck, Emma A. Renström, David Sivén
{"title":"The Social Network: How Friends’ Online Behavior and Belongingness Needs Influence Political Activity","authors":"H. Bäck, Emma A. Renström, David Sivén","doi":"10.1002/poi3.240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are people more likely to become more politically active through social media when they observe that their friends are active? Previous research has shown that an individual's likelihood of engaging politically is influenced by observations of how friends act through social media, but relatively little is known about how such social influence through social media interacts with personality features. We argue that individuals with high belongingness needs will engage in political activity if they believe that this is expected from the social groups they belong to. To evaluate this hypothesis, a survey experiment was designed (n = 289) in Qualtrics. We had two experimental conditions (friends or extended network) in which we informed participants that the most shared or “liked” online material among their friends or extended network on Facebook was a specific petition. In a control condition, they were informed that they were shown a random petition. To increase the credibility of the manipulation, we asked participants to log into a fictive app that supposedly downloaded their Facebook data. We show that individuals are more likely to engage politically if they observe that their friends have been politically active on Facebook, but only if they have high belongingness needs. (Less)","PeriodicalId":46894,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Internet","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/poi3.240","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Internet","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Are people more likely to become more politically active through social media when they observe that their friends are active? Previous research has shown that an individual's likelihood of engaging politically is influenced by observations of how friends act through social media, but relatively little is known about how such social influence through social media interacts with personality features. We argue that individuals with high belongingness needs will engage in political activity if they believe that this is expected from the social groups they belong to. To evaluate this hypothesis, a survey experiment was designed (n = 289) in Qualtrics. We had two experimental conditions (friends or extended network) in which we informed participants that the most shared or “liked” online material among their friends or extended network on Facebook was a specific petition. In a control condition, they were informed that they were shown a random petition. To increase the credibility of the manipulation, we asked participants to log into a fictive app that supposedly downloaded their Facebook data. We show that individuals are more likely to engage politically if they observe that their friends have been politically active on Facebook, but only if they have high belongingness needs. (Less)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交网络:朋友的在线行为和归属需求如何影响政治活动
当人们观察到他们的朋友很活跃时,他们是否更有可能通过社交媒体变得更积极地参与政治?先前的研究表明,观察朋友在社交媒体上的行为会影响一个人参与政治的可能性,但对于社交媒体上的这种社会影响是如何与个性特征相互作用的,人们知之甚少。我们认为,如果具有高归属感需求的个人认为这是他们所属的社会群体所期望的,他们就会参与政治活动。为了评估这一假设,我们在《质量学》中设计了一个调查实验(n = 289)。我们有两种实验条件(朋友或扩展网络),我们告诉参与者,他们在Facebook上的朋友或扩展网络中分享最多或“喜欢”最多的在线材料是一份特定的请愿书。在对照条件下,他们被告知他们看到了一份随机的请愿书。为了增加操纵的可信度,我们要求参与者登录一个虚构的应用程序,据称该应用程序下载了他们的Facebook数据。我们表明,如果个人观察到他们的朋友在Facebook上政治活跃,他们更有可能参与政治,但前提是他们有高度的归属感需求。(少)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.20%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Understanding public policy in the age of the Internet requires understanding how individuals, organizations, governments and networks behave, and what motivates them in this new environment. Technological innovation and internet-mediated interaction raise both challenges and opportunities for public policy: whether in areas that have received much work already (e.g. digital divides, digital government, and privacy) or newer areas, like regulation of data-intensive technologies and platforms, the rise of precarious labour, and regulatory responses to misinformation and hate speech. We welcome innovative research in areas where the Internet already impacts public policy, where it raises new challenges or dilemmas, or provides opportunities for policy that is smart and equitable. While we welcome perspectives from any academic discipline, we look particularly for insight that can feed into social science disciplines like political science, public administration, economics, sociology, and communication. We welcome articles that introduce methodological innovation, theoretical development, or rigorous data analysis concerning a particular question or problem of public policy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of online citizen participation on legitimacy beliefs in local government. Evidence from a comparative study of online participation platforms in three German municipalities “Highly nuanced policy is very difficult to apply at scale”: Examining researcher account and content takedowns online Special issue: The (international) politics of content takedowns: Theory, practice, ethics Countering online terrorist content: A social regulation approach Content takedowns and activist organizing: Impact of social media content moderation on activists and organizing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1