After the virtual flood: Risk perceptions and flood preparedness after virtual reality risk communication

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Judgment and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009074
Jantsje M. Mol, W. Botzen, J. Blasch
{"title":"After the virtual flood: Risk perceptions and flood preparedness after\n virtual reality risk communication","authors":"Jantsje M. Mol, W. Botzen, J. Blasch","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Many individuals experience problems understanding and preparing for\n low-probability/high-impact risk, like natural disasters and pandemics –\n unless they experience these events, yet then it is often too late to avoid\n damages. Individuals with recent disaster risk experience are, on average,\n better prepared. This seems to be mediated through emotions and a better\n understanding of the consequences. In this study, we use immersive virtual\n reality (VR) technology to examine whether a simulated disaster can\n stimulate people to invest in risk reducing measures in the context of\n flooding, which is one of the deadliest and most damaging natural disasters\n in the world. We investigate the possibility to boost risk perception,\n coping appraisal, negative emotions and damage-reducing behavior through a\n simulated flooding experience. We find that participants who experienced the\n virtual flood invest significantly more in the flood risk investment game\n than those in the control group. The investments in the VR treatment seem to\n decrease after four weeks but not significantly so.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Many individuals experience problems understanding and preparing for low-probability/high-impact risk, like natural disasters and pandemics – unless they experience these events, yet then it is often too late to avoid damages. Individuals with recent disaster risk experience are, on average, better prepared. This seems to be mediated through emotions and a better understanding of the consequences. In this study, we use immersive virtual reality (VR) technology to examine whether a simulated disaster can stimulate people to invest in risk reducing measures in the context of flooding, which is one of the deadliest and most damaging natural disasters in the world. We investigate the possibility to boost risk perception, coping appraisal, negative emotions and damage-reducing behavior through a simulated flooding experience. We find that participants who experienced the virtual flood invest significantly more in the flood risk investment game than those in the control group. The investments in the VR treatment seem to decrease after four weeks but not significantly so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟洪水之后:虚拟现实风险沟通之后的风险感知和洪水防备
许多人在理解和准备应对低概率/高影响风险(如自然灾害和流行病)方面遇到问题,除非他们经历了这些事件,但这时要避免损害往往为时已晚。平均而言,最近经历过灾难风险的人准备得更好。这似乎是通过情绪和对后果的更好理解来调解的。在本研究中,我们使用沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)技术来检验模拟灾害是否可以刺激人们在洪水背景下投资于降低风险的措施,洪水是世界上最致命和最具破坏性的自然灾害之一。我们研究了通过模拟洪水体验提高风险感知、应对评估、负面情绪和减少损害行为的可能性。我们发现,经历过虚拟洪水的参与者在洪水风险投资博弈中的投资显著高于对照组。在VR治疗上的投资似乎在四周后减少,但不是很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The benefits of deciding now and not later: The influence of the timing between acquiring knowledge and deciding on decision confidence, omission neglect bias, and choice deferral I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine The final step effect Choosing more aggressive commitment contracts for others than for the self Systematic metacognitive reflection helps people discover far-sighted decision strategies: A process-tracing experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1