See G.I. Jane Run: The Rise of Female Military Veteran Candidates for Congress

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Politics Research Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1177/1532673X231157388
Theresa Schroeder, Rebecca H. Best, Jeremy M. Teigen
{"title":"See G.I. Jane Run: The Rise of Female Military Veteran Candidates for Congress","authors":"Theresa Schroeder, Rebecca H. Best, Jeremy M. Teigen","doi":"10.1177/1532673X231157388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Veteran women are better represented in Congress than non-veteran women, but the reasons for this are unclear. Veteran women may be better represented because they run at higher rates and in more winnable races or because their military service leaves them uniquely qualified to overcome gender and partisan stereotypes. Voters often perceive women as lacking leadership ability and ill-suited to handling national security. However, female veterans have experience that may help them overcome gendered beliefs about their abilities. Using election data from the 2012–2020 U.S. congressional elections, we test whether veteran women gain greater voter support compared to non-veteran candidates and whether veteran women running as Democrats outperform male veteran Democrats. We find only limited evidence that military service wins more votes for candidates of either gender. Among Democrats, prior military service levels the playing field between male and female candidates, but veteran women only outperform veteran men in 2018.","PeriodicalId":51482,"journal":{"name":"American Politics Research","volume":"51 1","pages":"467 - 479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Politics Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X231157388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Veteran women are better represented in Congress than non-veteran women, but the reasons for this are unclear. Veteran women may be better represented because they run at higher rates and in more winnable races or because their military service leaves them uniquely qualified to overcome gender and partisan stereotypes. Voters often perceive women as lacking leadership ability and ill-suited to handling national security. However, female veterans have experience that may help them overcome gendered beliefs about their abilities. Using election data from the 2012–2020 U.S. congressional elections, we test whether veteran women gain greater voter support compared to non-veteran candidates and whether veteran women running as Democrats outperform male veteran Democrats. We find only limited evidence that military service wins more votes for candidates of either gender. Among Democrats, prior military service levels the playing field between male and female candidates, but veteran women only outperform veteran men in 2018.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参见《G.I. Jane Run:国会女退伍军人候选人的崛起》
资深女性在国会中的代表性高于非资深女性,但原因尚不清楚。退伍军人女性可能会有更好的代表性,因为她们的竞选率更高,参加的比赛更容易获胜,或者因为她们的兵役使她们有独特的资格克服性别和党派陈规定型观念。选民往往认为女性缺乏领导能力,不适合处理国家安全问题。然而,女性退伍军人的经验可能会帮助她们克服对自己能力的性别信仰。使用2012-2012年美国国会选举的选举数据,我们测试了与非资深候选人相比,资深女性是否获得了更大的选民支持,以及作为民主党人参选的资深女性是否优于男性资深民主党人。我们发现,只有有限的证据表明,兵役为任何性别的候选人赢得了更多的选票。在民主党人中,之前的兵役为男性和女性候选人提供了公平的竞争环境,但2018年,退伍军人女性的表现仅优于退伍军人男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Politics Research
American Politics Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The purpose of Amercian Politics Research is to promote and disseminate high-quality research in all areas of American politics, including local, state, and national. American Politics Research will publish significant studies concerning American political behavior, political parties, public opinion, legislative behavior, courts and the legal process, executive and administrative politics, public policy, and all other topics appropriate to our understanding of American government and politics. Manuscripts from all social science disciplines are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
When Do Voters Punish Politicians Who Violate Democratic Norms? Access or Experience? Determinants of Distrust in US Elections More Choices, More Problems? Ranked Choice Voting Errors in New York City How College Students React to COVID Vaccine PSAs: An Experimental Investigation Do Violations of Democratic Norms Change Political Attitudes? Evidence From the January 6th Insurrection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1