Pioneering excellence or fleeing mediocracy? Why venture capital firms internationalize

IF 4.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-17 Epub Date: 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1482
Harald Kollmann, Jakob Müllner, Jonas Puck
{"title":"Pioneering excellence or fleeing mediocracy? Why venture capital firms internationalize","authors":"Harald Kollmann,&nbsp;Jakob Müllner,&nbsp;Jonas Puck","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Theories and empirical evidence on the competitive motives for VC internationalization are unclear and contradictory. In our study, we adopt a performance feedback perspective to explain VC firms' motives to venture abroad. We leverage unique peer-performance data on 295 VC funds and 2954 VC investments and find support for our hypotheses that performance below (a) peer, (b) historical, or (c) market aspiration levels drives VCs exodus to (a) foreign and (b) more distant markets. Our study complements theories on internationalization with an organization ecology perspective that acknowledges internationalization as an attempt at adaptation triggered by poor performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Venture capitalists (VC) are not just owners, but take an active role in shaping their portfolio companies' strategies. This causes them to favor investments in their geographic and psychic proximity to allow hands-on business development. Nevertheless, the share of cross-border investments by VCs has risen steadily in past years. Our research shows that this internationalization is not solely driven by pioneering and successful VCs but oftentimes by VCs struggling to achieve performance levels. This notion of internationalization by the weakest has important firm-level consequences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"34-65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gsj.1482","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

Theories and empirical evidence on the competitive motives for VC internationalization are unclear and contradictory. In our study, we adopt a performance feedback perspective to explain VC firms' motives to venture abroad. We leverage unique peer-performance data on 295 VC funds and 2954 VC investments and find support for our hypotheses that performance below (a) peer, (b) historical, or (c) market aspiration levels drives VCs exodus to (a) foreign and (b) more distant markets. Our study complements theories on internationalization with an organization ecology perspective that acknowledges internationalization as an attempt at adaptation triggered by poor performance.

Managerial Summary

Venture capitalists (VC) are not just owners, but take an active role in shaping their portfolio companies' strategies. This causes them to favor investments in their geographic and psychic proximity to allow hands-on business development. Nevertheless, the share of cross-border investments by VCs has risen steadily in past years. Our research shows that this internationalization is not solely driven by pioneering and successful VCs but oftentimes by VCs struggling to achieve performance levels. This notion of internationalization by the weakest has important firm-level consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追求卓越还是逃离平庸?为什么风险投资公司国际化
关于风险投资国际化竞争动机的理论和实证证据并不清晰且相互矛盾。在我们的研究中,我们采用绩效反馈的视角来解释风险投资公司海外投资的动机。我们利用295家风投基金和2954家风投投资的独特同行业绩数据,找到了支持我们假设的证据,即低于(a)同行、(b)历史或(c)市场期望水平的业绩促使风投公司外流到(a)国外和(b)更遥远的市场。我们的研究从组织生态学的角度对国际化理论进行了补充,认为国际化是一种由不良绩效引发的适应尝试。风险资本家(VC)不仅仅是所有者,而且在塑造其投资组合公司的战略方面发挥着积极的作用。这使得他们倾向于在他们的地理位置和精神上接近的地方投资,以允许实际的业务发展。尽管如此,风险投资在跨境投资中的份额在过去几年中稳步上升。我们的研究表明,这种国际化不仅仅是由先锋和成功的风投推动的,而且往往是由努力达到绩效水平的风投推动的。这种由最弱企业进行国际化的概念在企业层面具有重要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Protecting CSR-based reputation abroad: Intra-firm trade as a governance mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1