Motivating Corporate Sustainability Research in Management Accounting Through the Lens of Paradox Theory*

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1111/1911-3838.12314
Nadra Pencle
{"title":"Motivating Corporate Sustainability Research in Management Accounting Through the Lens of Paradox Theory*","authors":"Nadra Pencle","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Organizational leaders identify corporate sustainability as a complicated and urgent business imperative that their organizations face. The management accountant's role is to help develop accounting systems to measure and report corporate sustainability, yet several factors contribute to the contemporary management accountant's challenges in satisfying stakeholder demands to integrate sustainability into their practices and operations. Like sustainability, the tenets of paradox theory revolve around salient interdependent tensions with contradictions that persist across time. Therefore, I propose paradox theory as an alternative to the business case framing that currently dominates sustainability decision-making. In this paper, I synthesize the existing literature at the intersection of management accounting, corporate sustainability, and paradox theory. My research also unearths a new paradox, one currently absent from the literature: the corporate sustainability temporal paradox. Finally, I offer a set of theory-based research questions geared toward moving beyond business case thinking in accounting corporate sustainability research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"21 4","pages":"663-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3838.12314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Organizational leaders identify corporate sustainability as a complicated and urgent business imperative that their organizations face. The management accountant's role is to help develop accounting systems to measure and report corporate sustainability, yet several factors contribute to the contemporary management accountant's challenges in satisfying stakeholder demands to integrate sustainability into their practices and operations. Like sustainability, the tenets of paradox theory revolve around salient interdependent tensions with contradictions that persist across time. Therefore, I propose paradox theory as an alternative to the business case framing that currently dominates sustainability decision-making. In this paper, I synthesize the existing literature at the intersection of management accounting, corporate sustainability, and paradox theory. My research also unearths a new paradox, one currently absent from the literature: the corporate sustainability temporal paradox. Finally, I offer a set of theory-based research questions geared toward moving beyond business case thinking in accounting corporate sustainability research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悖论理论视角下的管理会计企业可持续发展激励研究*
组织领导者将企业可持续发展视为组织面临的复杂而紧迫的业务要求。管理会计师的角色是帮助开发会计系统来衡量和报告公司的可持续性,然而,有几个因素导致当代管理会计师在满足利益相关者要求将可持续性整合到他们的实践和运营中所面临的挑战。与可持续性一样,悖论理论的原则也围绕着显著的相互依赖的紧张关系和持续存在的矛盾。因此,我提出悖论理论作为目前主导可持续决策的商业案例框架的替代方案。在本文中,我综合了现有的文献在管理会计,企业可持续发展和悖论理论的交叉。我的研究还揭示了一个新的悖论,一个目前在文献中缺失的悖论:企业可持续性时间悖论。最后,我提供了一套基于理论的研究问题,旨在超越会计公司可持续发展研究中的商业案例思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Perspectives
Accounting Perspectives BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Accounting Perspectives provides a forum for peer-reviewed applied research, analysis, synthesis and commentary on issues of interest to academics, practitioners, financial analysts, financial executives, regulators, accounting policy makers and accounting students. Articles are sought from academics and practitioners that address relevant issues in any and all areas of accounting and related fields, including financial accounting and reporting, auditing and other assurance services, management accounting and performance measurement, information systems and related technologies, tax policy and practice, professional ethics, accounting education, and related topics. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Financial Reporting & Assurance Standards (FRAS) Canada Corner The Relationship Between Financial Education in Young Adults and Financial Literacy: A Review of the Literature in Canada and the United States* An Exploration of Technological Innovations in the Audit Industry: Disruption Theory Applied to a Regulated Industry* Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1