Social media, disinformation, and democracy: how different types of social media usage affect democracy cross-nationally

IF 3.7 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Democratization Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1080/13510347.2023.2208355
Lance Y. Hunter
{"title":"Social media, disinformation, and democracy: how different types of social media usage affect democracy cross-nationally","authors":"Lance Y. Hunter","doi":"10.1080/13510347.2023.2208355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much speculation exists regarding how social media impacts the health of democracies. However, minimal scholarly research empirically examines the effect social media has on democracy across multiple states and regions. Thus, this article analyses the effect social media and disinformation transmitted over social media have on democracy. The findings from a cross-national, time-series analysis of 158 states from 2000–2019 indicate that different types of social media usage have varying effects on democracy. General social media consumption, the presence of diverse political viewpoints on social media, and the use of social media in political campaigns bolster democracy. However, social media disinformation, online political polarization, and the use of social media to organize offline violence reduce overall levels of democracy. In addition, a mediation analysis is conducted to identify the precise linkages between social media disinformation and democracy and indicates that government and political party disinformation impact democracy by weakening key democratic norms.","PeriodicalId":47953,"journal":{"name":"Democratization","volume":"30 1","pages":"1040 - 1072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2208355","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Much speculation exists regarding how social media impacts the health of democracies. However, minimal scholarly research empirically examines the effect social media has on democracy across multiple states and regions. Thus, this article analyses the effect social media and disinformation transmitted over social media have on democracy. The findings from a cross-national, time-series analysis of 158 states from 2000–2019 indicate that different types of social media usage have varying effects on democracy. General social media consumption, the presence of diverse political viewpoints on social media, and the use of social media in political campaigns bolster democracy. However, social media disinformation, online political polarization, and the use of social media to organize offline violence reduce overall levels of democracy. In addition, a mediation analysis is conducted to identify the precise linkages between social media disinformation and democracy and indicates that government and political party disinformation impact democracy by weakening key democratic norms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体、虚假信息和民主:不同类型的社交媒体使用如何影响全国民主
摘要关于社交媒体如何影响民主国家的健康,人们有很多猜测。然而,最低限度的学术研究实证考察了社交媒体对多个州和地区民主的影响。因此,本文分析了社交媒体和通过社交媒体传播的虚假信息对民主的影响。2000-2009年对158个州进行的跨国家时间序列分析结果表明,不同类型的社交媒体使用对民主有不同的影响。一般的社交媒体消费、社交媒体上各种政治观点的存在,以及在政治竞选中使用社交媒体,都有助于民主。然而,社交媒体的虚假信息、网络政治两极分化以及利用社交媒体组织线下暴力,降低了民主的总体水平。此外,还进行了调解分析,以确定社交媒体虚假信息与民主之间的确切联系,并表明政府和政党虚假信息通过削弱关键的民主规范来影响民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Democratization
Democratization POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Democratization aims to promote a better understanding of democratization - defined as the way democratic norms, institutions and practices evolve and are disseminated both within and across national and cultural boundaries. While the focus is on democratization viewed as a process, the journal also builds on the enduring interest in democracy itself and its analysis. The emphasis is contemporary and the approach comparative, with the publication of scholarly contributions about those areas where democratization is currently attracting considerable attention world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Benign bureaucracies? Religious affairs ministries as institutions of political control Legitimation, co-optation, and survival: why is Turkey silent on China’s persecution of Uyghurs? Neoliberal Citizenship: Sacred Markets, Sacrificial Lives Neoliberal Citizenship: Sacred Markets, Sacrificial Lives , by Luca Mavelli, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 190 pp., £75(hardback), index, ISBN 978-0-19-285758-3 Democratization, state capacity and developmental correlates of international artificial intelligence trade Bread, freedom or social justice? An empirical investigation into the determinants of the Arab Spring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1