Combining wind power and farmed fish: Coastal community perceptions of multi-use offshore renewable energy installations in Europe

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102421
Suzannah-Lynn Billing , George Charalambides , Paul Tett , Michelle Giordano , Carlo Ruzzo , Felice Arena , Anita Santoro , Fabrizio Lagasco , Giulio Brizzi , Maurizio Collu
{"title":"Combining wind power and farmed fish: Coastal community perceptions of multi-use offshore renewable energy installations in Europe","authors":"Suzannah-Lynn Billing ,&nbsp;George Charalambides ,&nbsp;Paul Tett ,&nbsp;Michelle Giordano ,&nbsp;Carlo Ruzzo ,&nbsp;Felice Arena ,&nbsp;Anita Santoro ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Lagasco ,&nbsp;Giulio Brizzi ,&nbsp;Maurizio Collu","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2021.102421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is increasing competition for space in coastal seas as new industrial sectors, such as Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) and Aquaculture, seek to expand. Multi-Use - involving sharing of space and, in some cases, facilities - can lessen competition and reduce industry costs if societal and economic challenges can be overcome. An example societal challenge is that of gaining Social Licence to Operate (SLO) for 'Multifunctional Offshore Installations' (MOI) combining fish farming with MRE (from wind and waves) in a large floating structure. This article reports a mixed-methods study at two potential MOI deployment sites in 2019, aiming to understand the local context for SLO. A survey was carried out in Reggio Calabria, Italy, with 108 respondents, and in Islay, Scotland, with 127 respondents. Questions concerned opinions about MRE and fish-farming, separately and combined. A facilitated workshop in Reggio Calabria provided additional qualitative data. Most findings were the same in both places. Respondents thought better of MRE than fish-farming but remained moderately likely to eat fish produced in MOI. The majority distrusted regulators to control environmental impacts of the technology. The main differences were that respondents in Reggio Calabria anticipated local benefits from MOI industrial activity, and were more likely to accept development by non-local owners than were people on Islay. We interpreted the findings in a conceptual framework that combines theory for SLO with theory for Action Situations, hypothesising that a community’s diffuse and perhaps heterogenous opinions might ‘crystalise’ around an issue during an Action Situation. The hypothesis will be tested when a prototype MOI is deployed near Reggio Calabria in 2021.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102421"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621005089/pdfft?md5=3f67e78b668581536a76d132d5a14b4a&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629621005089-main.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621005089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

There is increasing competition for space in coastal seas as new industrial sectors, such as Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) and Aquaculture, seek to expand. Multi-Use - involving sharing of space and, in some cases, facilities - can lessen competition and reduce industry costs if societal and economic challenges can be overcome. An example societal challenge is that of gaining Social Licence to Operate (SLO) for 'Multifunctional Offshore Installations' (MOI) combining fish farming with MRE (from wind and waves) in a large floating structure. This article reports a mixed-methods study at two potential MOI deployment sites in 2019, aiming to understand the local context for SLO. A survey was carried out in Reggio Calabria, Italy, with 108 respondents, and in Islay, Scotland, with 127 respondents. Questions concerned opinions about MRE and fish-farming, separately and combined. A facilitated workshop in Reggio Calabria provided additional qualitative data. Most findings were the same in both places. Respondents thought better of MRE than fish-farming but remained moderately likely to eat fish produced in MOI. The majority distrusted regulators to control environmental impacts of the technology. The main differences were that respondents in Reggio Calabria anticipated local benefits from MOI industrial activity, and were more likely to accept development by non-local owners than were people on Islay. We interpreted the findings in a conceptual framework that combines theory for SLO with theory for Action Situations, hypothesising that a community’s diffuse and perhaps heterogenous opinions might ‘crystalise’ around an issue during an Action Situation. The hypothesis will be tested when a prototype MOI is deployed near Reggio Calabria in 2021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合风力发电和养殖鱼类:欧洲沿海社区对多用途海上可再生能源装置的看法
随着海洋可再生能源(MRE)和水产养殖等新工业部门寻求扩大,对沿海海域空间的竞争日益激烈。如果能够克服社会和经济挑战,多用途- -包括共享空间,在某些情况下还包括共享设施- -可以减少竞争并降低工业成本。一个社会挑战的例子是获得“多功能海上设施”(MOI)的社会运营许可证(SLO),该设施将鱼类养殖与大型浮动结构中的MRE(风能和海浪)相结合。本文报告了2019年在两个潜在的MOI部署地点进行的混合方法研究,旨在了解SLO的当地环境。一项调查在意大利的雷焦卡拉布里亚进行,有108名受访者,在苏格兰的伊莱进行,有127名受访者。问题涉及对MRE和养鱼的意见,分别和合并。在雷焦卡拉布里亚便利举办的讲习班提供了更多的质量数据。这两个地方的大多数调查结果是相同的。受访者认为更多的是渔业,而不是养鱼,但仍然有适度的可能吃在MOI生产的鱼。大多数人不相信监管机构能够控制这项技术对环境的影响。主要的区别在于,雷焦卡拉布里亚的受访者期望从MOI工业活动中获得当地利益,并且比Islay人更有可能接受非本地所有者的开发。我们将SLO理论与行动情境理论相结合的概念框架解释了这些发现,假设在行动情境中,社区中分散的、也许是异质的观点可能会围绕一个问题“结晶”。2021年在雷焦卡拉布里亚附近部署原型MOI时,将对这一假设进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Desert or garden? Energy sacrifice zones, territorial affordances and competing visions for post-coal landscapes: The case of the Czechoslovak Army Mine Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom Institutional entrepreneuring for energy poverty: The role of boundary work in developing a collaborative product-service system for household appliances A technology to solve the water-energy-food crisis? Mapping sociotechnical configurations of agrivoltaics using Q-methodology Justice or just plans? Reviewing the energy transition strategy of Brazil's Ceará state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1