Obstacles to the African Solutions Approach: Can the African Union Realize a Peaceful and Secure Africa?

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of African Union Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-24 DOI:10.31920/2050-4306/2020/9n3a4
B. D. Gardachew
{"title":"Obstacles to the African Solutions Approach: Can the African Union Realize a Peaceful and Secure Africa?","authors":"B. D. Gardachew","doi":"10.31920/2050-4306/2020/9n3a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the major constraints the African Union faces in its peace support operations in Sudan (Darfur) and Somalia. Identifying and understanding these hindrances provide lessons for the regional and international stakeholders that are planning to undertake future peace operations on the continent. The study closely examines why the African Mission in Sudan (AMIS) and the African Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) were constrained in their attempts to find durable peace in Darfur and Somalia, respectively. The selection of these cases was motivated by different factors. In the first place, both countries have had to deal with protracted internal conflict. In addition, both countries are glaring examples of AU's comprehensive peace support operations. The data that inform the study were collected from a synthesis of the rich body of literature and personal interviews with purposively selected officials and experts on the issue under investigation. The study contends that given the limited financing from AU member states, weak military capacity, and division among member states over intervention, achieving the ambitious objective of African solutions to African problems will remains impossible for the foreseeable future.","PeriodicalId":37163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Union Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Union Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2050-4306/2020/9n3a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the major constraints the African Union faces in its peace support operations in Sudan (Darfur) and Somalia. Identifying and understanding these hindrances provide lessons for the regional and international stakeholders that are planning to undertake future peace operations on the continent. The study closely examines why the African Mission in Sudan (AMIS) and the African Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) were constrained in their attempts to find durable peace in Darfur and Somalia, respectively. The selection of these cases was motivated by different factors. In the first place, both countries have had to deal with protracted internal conflict. In addition, both countries are glaring examples of AU's comprehensive peace support operations. The data that inform the study were collected from a synthesis of the rich body of literature and personal interviews with purposively selected officials and experts on the issue under investigation. The study contends that given the limited financing from AU member states, weak military capacity, and division among member states over intervention, achieving the ambitious objective of African solutions to African problems will remains impossible for the foreseeable future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲解决方案的障碍:非洲联盟能否实现一个和平与安全的非洲?
本研究探讨了非洲联盟在苏丹(达尔富尔)和索马里的和平支持行动中面临的主要制约因素。确定和了解这些障碍为计划今后在非洲大陆开展和平行动的区域和国际利益攸关方提供了经验教训。这项研究仔细研究了为什么非洲驻苏丹特派团(非盟特派团)和非洲驻索马里特派团(非盟特派团)分别在达尔富尔和索马里寻求持久和平的努力受到限制。这些案例的选择是由不同的因素驱动的。首先,两国都不得不应对旷日持久的内部冲突。此外,这两个国家都是非盟全面支持和平行动的突出例子。为研究提供信息的数据是综合了丰富的文献资料和对有目的选定的官员和专家就调查中的问题进行的个人访谈而收集的。该研究认为,鉴于非盟成员国提供的资金有限,军事能力薄弱,以及成员国之间对干预的分歧,在可预见的未来,实现非洲解决非洲问题的雄心勃勃的目标仍然是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of African Union Studies
Journal of African Union Studies Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Nile Basin Initiatives (NBI) to External mediator: Challenges of the Ethiopia's Renaissance Dam Negotiations Editorial commentary : African Union and the quest for a new Africa The United Nations, International Criminal Court and African Union's Delayed Response to the Prolonged Dictatorship in Sudan The African Union's Collective Security Mechanisms and the Challenge of Armed Non-State Actors The United Nations, International Criminal Court and African Union's Delayed Response to the Prolonged Dictatorship in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1