Farmers Markets and Single-Use Plastic: Why Environmentally Conscious Consumers Don’t Bring Reusable Bags

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EXTENSION Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.34068/joe.59.04.17
Scott D. Hardy, Jill Bartolotta
{"title":"Farmers Markets and Single-Use Plastic: Why Environmentally Conscious Consumers Don’t Bring Reusable Bags","authors":"Scott D. Hardy, Jill Bartolotta","doi":"10.34068/joe.59.04.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study looks at the role of Extension in helping local officials reduce plastic bag use at farmers markets in three Lake County, OH communities. We distributed free reusable bags to shoppers and conducted an education and outreach program. We then took observations to determine if the free reusable bags were being used. We also invited shoppers to take a voluntary survey about their environmental attitudes, why or why not they use the reusable bags, and how best to reduce plastic bag use moving forward. Results from the study suggest that supplying free reusable bags at farmer markets is not an effective strategy for Extension professionals attempting to reduce plastic bag use. Instead, we recommend working with local officials to develop financial incentives and disincentives tied to the type of bag option shoppers use, implement plastic bag bans at markets, and conduct locally-focused education and outreach. Although shoppers’ environmental literacy and desire for sustainability is high, it is shown that behavior change is unlikely to occur without financial or policy incentives.","PeriodicalId":47627,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EXTENSION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EXTENSION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.59.04.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study looks at the role of Extension in helping local officials reduce plastic bag use at farmers markets in three Lake County, OH communities. We distributed free reusable bags to shoppers and conducted an education and outreach program. We then took observations to determine if the free reusable bags were being used. We also invited shoppers to take a voluntary survey about their environmental attitudes, why or why not they use the reusable bags, and how best to reduce plastic bag use moving forward. Results from the study suggest that supplying free reusable bags at farmer markets is not an effective strategy for Extension professionals attempting to reduce plastic bag use. Instead, we recommend working with local officials to develop financial incentives and disincentives tied to the type of bag option shoppers use, implement plastic bag bans at markets, and conduct locally-focused education and outreach. Although shoppers’ environmental literacy and desire for sustainability is high, it is shown that behavior change is unlikely to occur without financial or policy incentives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农贸市场和一次性塑料:为什么有环保意识的消费者不带可重复使用的袋子
本研究着眼于推广项目在帮助当地官员减少俄亥俄州莱克县三个社区农贸市场塑料袋使用方面的作用。我们向顾客免费分发可重复使用的袋子,并开展了教育和推广计划。然后我们进行观察,以确定免费的可重复使用的袋子是否被使用。我们还邀请购物者自愿参与调查,了解他们对环境的态度,为什么或为什么不使用可重复使用的袋子,以及如何最好地减少塑料袋的使用。研究结果表明,对于试图减少塑料袋使用的推广专业人员来说,在农贸市场提供免费的可重复使用的袋子并不是一个有效的策略。相反,我们建议与当地官员合作,制定与购物者使用的塑料袋类型相关的财政激励和抑制措施,在市场上实施塑料袋禁令,并开展以当地为重点的教育和推广活动。尽管购物者的环境素养和对可持续性的渴望很高,但研究表明,如果没有财政或政策激励,行为改变不太可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF EXTENSION
JOURNAL OF EXTENSION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extension (JOE) expands and updates the research and knowledge base for U.S. Extension professionals and other outreach educators to improve their effectiveness. JOE also serves as a forum for emerging and contemporary issues affecting U.S. Cooperative Extension education. JOE is a refereed journal. Feature, Research in Brief, and Ideas at Work submissions undergo double-blind review, and Commentary and Tools of the Trade submissions are reviewed by the editor, Dr. Laura Hoelscher.
期刊最新文献
Intercultural Competency Development Model for Extension Professionals: Expert Consensus Using the Delphi Technique Increasing Extension Volunteer Knowledge and Preparedness with Youth Protection Training Across Program Areas Who Do Farmers Trust? Identifying Farmer Support Systems During Times of Stress and Suicide Risk Evaluating Physical Activity Resources to Support Health Equity in Arizona Food Sovereignty in Indigenous Communities: Extension Programs for Health, Culture, and Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1