Comparing Religious Intolerance in Indonesia by Affiliation to Muslim Organizations

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Pacific Affairs Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5509/20239615
Hariyadi, Akhmad Rizal Shidiq, A. Yusuf, Dharra Widdhyaningtyas Mahardhika
{"title":"Comparing Religious Intolerance in Indonesia by Affiliation to Muslim Organizations","authors":"Hariyadi, Akhmad Rizal Shidiq, A. Yusuf, Dharra Widdhyaningtyas Mahardhika","doi":"10.5509/20239615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Very few studies explicitly, let alone quantitatively, examine gaps in religious intolerance among individual Muslims based on a liation with major Muslim organizations in Indonesia. Most existing studies either focus on a single organization (non-comparative), are at the organizational\n policy level (not examining individual attitudes), or use a limited number of samples in their analysis. Against this backdrop, this study compares Indonesian Muslims' levels of religious intolerance based on their a liation with Muslim organizations or traditions: Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah,\n and other organizations. We utilize a large-scale household survey, the 2014 Indonesia Family Life Survey-5, and run an ordinal logistic regression to identify organizations' rank on the religious intolerance scale. We find that Muslims without any a liation with a Muslim organization (some\n 18 percent of Indonesian Muslims) are the most tolerant. Against this reference group, we find that NU followers are generally the most tolerant, followed by those a liated with Muhammadiyah, and those a liated with other Muslim organizations. This finding adds a stock of knowledge to our\n understanding of religion and society, especially regarding interfaith relations in Indonesia and in the Muslim world in general. Methodologically, this study also shows the benefit and feasibility of identifying the dynamic of religious intolerance using a quantitative approach at a micro\n level.","PeriodicalId":47041,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5509/20239615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Very few studies explicitly, let alone quantitatively, examine gaps in religious intolerance among individual Muslims based on a liation with major Muslim organizations in Indonesia. Most existing studies either focus on a single organization (non-comparative), are at the organizational policy level (not examining individual attitudes), or use a limited number of samples in their analysis. Against this backdrop, this study compares Indonesian Muslims' levels of religious intolerance based on their a liation with Muslim organizations or traditions: Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah, and other organizations. We utilize a large-scale household survey, the 2014 Indonesia Family Life Survey-5, and run an ordinal logistic regression to identify organizations' rank on the religious intolerance scale. We find that Muslims without any a liation with a Muslim organization (some 18 percent of Indonesian Muslims) are the most tolerant. Against this reference group, we find that NU followers are generally the most tolerant, followed by those a liated with Muhammadiyah, and those a liated with other Muslim organizations. This finding adds a stock of knowledge to our understanding of religion and society, especially regarding interfaith relations in Indonesia and in the Muslim world in general. Methodologically, this study also shows the benefit and feasibility of identifying the dynamic of religious intolerance using a quantitative approach at a micro level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从与穆斯林组织的关系看印度尼西亚的宗教不容忍现象
很少有研究明确地,更不用说在数量上,根据与印度尼西亚主要穆斯林组织的联系,审查个别穆斯林之间宗教不容忍的差距。大多数现有的研究要么集中在单个组织(非比较性),要么在组织政策层面(不检查个人态度),要么在分析中使用有限数量的样本。在此背景下,本研究比较了印度尼西亚穆斯林基于其联盟与穆斯林组织或传统(Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah和其他组织)的宗教不容忍程度。我们利用大规模的家庭调查,即2014年印度尼西亚家庭生活调查-5,并运行有序逻辑回归来确定组织在宗教不宽容量表上的排名。我们发现,没有与任何穆斯林组织结盟的穆斯林(约占印尼穆斯林的18%)是最宽容的。针对这一参照群体,我们发现NU的追随者通常是最宽容的,其次是那些与穆罕默德迪亚有联系的人,以及那些与其他穆斯林组织有联系的人。这一发现增加了我们对宗教和社会的认识,特别是对印度尼西亚和整个穆斯林世界的宗教间关系的认识。在方法上,这项研究也显示了在微观一级使用定量方法确定宗教不容忍动态的好处和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Affairs
Pacific Affairs AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Pacific Affairs has, over the years, celebrated and fostered a community of scholars and people active in the life of Asia and the Pacific. It has published scholarly articles of contemporary significance on Asia and the Pacific since 1928. Its initial incarnation from 1926 to 1928 was as a newsletter for the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR), but since May 1928, it has been published continuously as a quarterly under the same name. The IPR was a collaborative organization established in 1925 by leaders from several YMCA branches in the Asia Pacific, to “study the conditions of the Pacific people with a view to the improvement of their mutual relations.”
期刊最新文献
Department of Error. Management of Recurrent and Refractory Posterior Epistaxis by Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Cauterization: a Prospective Cohort Study. "Ambiguous" Network Monarchy as Problematic Euphoric Couplet Governing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia: Shifting Capacity under a Fragmented Political Leadership Presidential Personality and Foreign Policy Decision-Making: The Sunshine Policy under Kim Dae-jung (1998–2003)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1