A Civic Alternative to Stoicism: The Ethics of Hellenistic Honorary Decrees

IF 0.9 2区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.1525/CA.2018.37.2.187
B. Gray
{"title":"A Civic Alternative to Stoicism: The Ethics of Hellenistic Honorary Decrees","authors":"B. Gray","doi":"10.1525/CA.2018.37.2.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shows how the public inscriptions of Hellenistic poleis, especially decrees in honor of leading citizens, illuminate Greek ethical thinking, including wider debates about questions of central importance for Greek ethical philosophers. It does so by comparing decrees' rhetoric with the ethical language and doctrines of different ancient philosophical schools. Whereas some scholars identify ethical views comparable to Stoic ideas in Hellenistic decrees, this article argues that there are more significant overlaps, especially in decrees from Asia Minor dating to after 150 BC, with fourth-century BC ethical philosophy, especially Aristotle's, and its Hellenistic continuators. The overlaps between decrees and philosophers' approaches had complex, diverse causes (section 4), probably sometimes including philosophical education and influence. Comparison of philosophy and epigraphy shows that, in the same way as the polis continued to flourish after Chaironeia, critical reflection about the ethical foundations of civic life also remained vibrant, among both philosophers and citizens.","PeriodicalId":45164,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/CA.2018.37.2.187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/CA.2018.37.2.187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article shows how the public inscriptions of Hellenistic poleis, especially decrees in honor of leading citizens, illuminate Greek ethical thinking, including wider debates about questions of central importance for Greek ethical philosophers. It does so by comparing decrees' rhetoric with the ethical language and doctrines of different ancient philosophical schools. Whereas some scholars identify ethical views comparable to Stoic ideas in Hellenistic decrees, this article argues that there are more significant overlaps, especially in decrees from Asia Minor dating to after 150 BC, with fourth-century BC ethical philosophy, especially Aristotle's, and its Hellenistic continuators. The overlaps between decrees and philosophers' approaches had complex, diverse causes (section 4), probably sometimes including philosophical education and influence. Comparison of philosophy and epigraphy shows that, in the same way as the polis continued to flourish after Chaironeia, critical reflection about the ethical foundations of civic life also remained vibrant, among both philosophers and citizens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯多葛主义的公民选择:希腊荣誉法令的伦理
这篇文章展示了希腊化poleis的公开铭文,特别是纪念杰出公民的法令,如何阐明希腊的伦理思想,包括关于希腊伦理哲学家核心问题的更广泛的辩论。它通过将法令的修辞与古代不同哲学流派的伦理语言和学说进行比较来做到这一点。尽管一些学者在希腊化法令中确定了可与斯多葛思想相媲美的伦理观点,但本文认为,与公元前4世纪的伦理哲学,特别是亚里士多德的伦理哲学及其希腊化延续者,存在更显著的重叠,尤其是在公元前150年之后的小亚细亚法令中。法令和哲学家方法之间的重叠有着复杂多样的原因(第4节),有时可能包括哲学教育和影响。哲学和金石学的比较表明,正如城邦在Chaironeia之后继续繁荣一样,对公民生活伦理基础的批判性反思也在哲学家和公民中保持着活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Homer and the Simile at Sea Translating Aphrodite: The Sandal-Binder in Two Roman Contexts Working for the Emperor at Antium: Profession and Prestige in the Fasti Antiates Ministrorum Domus Augustae Life Cycles beyond the Human: Biomass and Biorhythms in Heraclitus Feeling for Augustine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1