Accessibility of instructional materials for effective teaching: outlook from high schools in Eleme, River State, Nigeria

K. Ukhurebor, Obiukwu Eucharia Odinakachi, Festus Onyeka Mbalisi, J. Opateye, Enoch Leonard
{"title":"Accessibility of instructional materials for effective teaching: outlook from high schools in Eleme, River State, Nigeria","authors":"K. Ukhurebor, Obiukwu Eucharia Odinakachi, Festus Onyeka Mbalisi, J. Opateye, Enoch Leonard","doi":"10.18844/cjes.v18i2.8225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study focuses on the accessibility of instructional material for effective teaching in secondary (high) schools in Eleme, Rivers State, Nigeria. The population of the study consisted of 450 teachers from eight secondary (high) schools using a structured research questionnaire. The questionnaires were administered to 78 teachers from eight secondary (high) schools. Percentages (%) and frequency counts were used to assess the data that had been obtained. The numerical values of the estimated % of the response options’ values served as the basis for the decision. Any item with a % score of 50 or higher was considered to be accessible (available), whereas % values lower than 50 were considered to be unavailable. The analysis's findings indicated that these secondary (high) schools had a poor supply of instructional materials for efficient instruction. The little teaching resources that were provided were insufficient, and the teachers either could hardly use them or did not know how to use them, so they were rarely used. The research also revealed that teaching without instructional resources is ineffective; thus, for efficient teaching and learning, teachers should make the most of the instructional materials that are already accessible. The study suggests that the government set aside enough money in the budget to increase access to teaching resources across the board for all public secondary (high) schools. This study recommends more investigation into how teachers utilize instructional resources for efficient teaching and learning. Hence, it is believed that this findings from this study will attempt to bring solutions to the inaccessibility and underuse of instructional resources in teaching and studying in high schools.\nKeywords: Academic performance; Learning; Student; School; Teaching","PeriodicalId":37121,"journal":{"name":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v18i2.8225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study focuses on the accessibility of instructional material for effective teaching in secondary (high) schools in Eleme, Rivers State, Nigeria. The population of the study consisted of 450 teachers from eight secondary (high) schools using a structured research questionnaire. The questionnaires were administered to 78 teachers from eight secondary (high) schools. Percentages (%) and frequency counts were used to assess the data that had been obtained. The numerical values of the estimated % of the response options’ values served as the basis for the decision. Any item with a % score of 50 or higher was considered to be accessible (available), whereas % values lower than 50 were considered to be unavailable. The analysis's findings indicated that these secondary (high) schools had a poor supply of instructional materials for efficient instruction. The little teaching resources that were provided were insufficient, and the teachers either could hardly use them or did not know how to use them, so they were rarely used. The research also revealed that teaching without instructional resources is ineffective; thus, for efficient teaching and learning, teachers should make the most of the instructional materials that are already accessible. The study suggests that the government set aside enough money in the budget to increase access to teaching resources across the board for all public secondary (high) schools. This study recommends more investigation into how teachers utilize instructional resources for efficient teaching and learning. Hence, it is believed that this findings from this study will attempt to bring solutions to the inaccessibility and underuse of instructional resources in teaching and studying in high schools. Keywords: Academic performance; Learning; Student; School; Teaching
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效教学教材的可及性:来自尼日利亚河州埃莱姆高中的展望
这项研究的重点是在尼日利亚河流州埃莱姆的中学(高中)有效教学的教学材料的可获得性。研究对象包括来自8所中学(高中)的450名教师,采用结构化调查问卷。问卷调查对象为来自8所中学的78名教师。使用百分比(%)和频率计数来评估已获得的数据。响应选项值的估计百分比的数值作为决策的基础。任何%得分为50或更高的项目都被认为是可访问的(可用的),而%值低于50被认为是不可用的。分析的结果表明,这些中学(高中)的教学材料供应不足,无法进行有效的教学。所提供的少量教学资源不足,教师要么不会使用,要么不知道如何使用,因此很少使用。研究还发现,没有教学资源的教学是无效的;因此,为了有效的教与学,教师应该充分利用已有的教学材料。研究表明,政府在预算中拨出足够的资金,以增加所有公立中学(高中)获得教学资源的机会。本研究建议对教师如何有效地利用教学资源进行更多的调查。因此,我们相信本研究的结果将试图为解决高中教学和学习中教学资源难以获得和利用不足的问题提供解决方案。关键词:学习成绩;学习;学生;学校;教学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of preschool teachers' chess learning and teaching experiences Intrinsic motivation in preschool children: Predictive effect on levels of resilience Utilizing prior language knowledge: A study of how Thai students translate unknown languages into English The effectiveness of the psychoeducation program developed to increase school attachment Manifestations of students' "clip thinking" in working with a scientific text
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1