Writing a Script for India’s FTA Dispute Settlement Chapters

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2022043
R. Bhala
{"title":"Writing a Script for India’s FTA Dispute Settlement Chapters","authors":"R. Bhala","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India should negotiate robust dispute settlement chapters in its free trade agreements (FTAs). Through appropriate specific provisions in those chapters, India should pursue three goals, namely, the swift, just resolution of disputes, development of a common law on international trade, and enhancement of the rule of law in the Indo-Pacific region. India’s pursuit of these goals will help it expand its influence across the region, and counter the prospect of an authoritarian Chinese Communist Party (CCP) essentially dictating how trade and investment disputes are to be resolved. However, for India to pursue such negotiations, it must first resolve its bipolar approach to trade policy, between Nehruvian Socialism and Market-Oriented Reformism, which has paralysed it from pursuing an aggressive FTA agenda amidst understandable concerns about the nexus among trade, growth, and poverty alleviation. That means it will have to de-emphasize its current – and quixotic – policy of Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India).\ndispute settlement, adjudication, arbitration, WTO, USMCA, FTA, CPTPP, judicial interpretation, textualism, negotiations, binding, blockage, panel, appellate, procedures, deadlines, subject matter jurisdiction, transparency, precedent, stare decisis, common law, rule of law","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India should negotiate robust dispute settlement chapters in its free trade agreements (FTAs). Through appropriate specific provisions in those chapters, India should pursue three goals, namely, the swift, just resolution of disputes, development of a common law on international trade, and enhancement of the rule of law in the Indo-Pacific region. India’s pursuit of these goals will help it expand its influence across the region, and counter the prospect of an authoritarian Chinese Communist Party (CCP) essentially dictating how trade and investment disputes are to be resolved. However, for India to pursue such negotiations, it must first resolve its bipolar approach to trade policy, between Nehruvian Socialism and Market-Oriented Reformism, which has paralysed it from pursuing an aggressive FTA agenda amidst understandable concerns about the nexus among trade, growth, and poverty alleviation. That means it will have to de-emphasize its current – and quixotic – policy of Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India). dispute settlement, adjudication, arbitration, WTO, USMCA, FTA, CPTPP, judicial interpretation, textualism, negotiations, binding, blockage, panel, appellate, procedures, deadlines, subject matter jurisdiction, transparency, precedent, stare decisis, common law, rule of law
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为印度自由贸易协定争端解决章节写剧本
印度应该在其自由贸易协定(FTAs)中就强有力的争端解决章节进行谈判。通过这些章节的适当具体规定,印度应该追求三个目标,即迅速、公正地解决争端,发展国际贸易普通法,加强印度-太平洋地区的法治。印度对这些目标的追求将有助于扩大其在整个地区的影响力,并对抗专制的中国共产党(CCP)基本上决定如何解决贸易和投资争端的前景。然而,对于印度来说,要进行这样的谈判,它必须首先解决其在贸易政策上的两极做法,即尼赫鲁社会主义和市场导向的改革主义,这使得它无法在贸易、增长和减贫之间的关系上追求积极的自由贸易协定议程。这意味着印度将不得不弱化其当前不切实际的自力更生政策。争端解决、裁决、仲裁、WTO、USMCA、FTA、CPTPP、司法解释、文本主义、谈判、约束力、阻碍、专家组、上诉、程序、最后期限、标的管辖权、透明度、先例、判例、普通法、法治
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Analysis Of The Foreign Subsidies Regulation From An International Trade Law Perspective On Trade In Goods Robotics Process Automation (RPA) And The Import/Export Customs Declaration Process Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1 The Foreign Subsidies Regulation of the European Union: A New Instrument Levelling the Playing Field? Digitalization in Global Trade: Opportunities and Challenges for Investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1