Personalized Expert Guidance of Students’ Book Choices in Primary and Secondary Education

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2022.2113944
Lisa van der Sande, Ilona Wildeman, A. Bus, R. van Steensel
{"title":"Personalized Expert Guidance of Students’ Book Choices in Primary and Secondary Education","authors":"Lisa van der Sande, Ilona Wildeman, A. Bus, R. van Steensel","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2022.2113944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In many schools, independent silent reading of self-selected books is used to promote reading. However, self-selection may be insufficient to counter negative reading experiences, particularly when students choose books not attuned to their reading level and interest. Two studies experimentally tested whether personalized expert guidance when selecting books could prevent a reading attitude decline. Study 1 focused on readers in prevocational secondary education (Grades 7 and 8; N = 136). Study 2 included younger readers from primary education (Grades 4–6, N = 99). Students in the experimental condition met with a librarian to discuss book choices every two weeks for three months. In both studies, the intervention stabilized the reading attitude decline, although, in Study 1, only for more advanced readers. In Study 2, reading comprehension of the most proficient readers also improved. This indicates that guidance in selecting books can preserve students’ reading attitude and increase reading proficiency growth.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"380 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2113944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In many schools, independent silent reading of self-selected books is used to promote reading. However, self-selection may be insufficient to counter negative reading experiences, particularly when students choose books not attuned to their reading level and interest. Two studies experimentally tested whether personalized expert guidance when selecting books could prevent a reading attitude decline. Study 1 focused on readers in prevocational secondary education (Grades 7 and 8; N = 136). Study 2 included younger readers from primary education (Grades 4–6, N = 99). Students in the experimental condition met with a librarian to discuss book choices every two weeks for three months. In both studies, the intervention stabilized the reading attitude decline, although, in Study 1, only for more advanced readers. In Study 2, reading comprehension of the most proficient readers also improved. This indicates that guidance in selecting books can preserve students’ reading attitude and increase reading proficiency growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中小学学生选书的个性化专家指导
在许多学校,自主默读自选书籍是促进阅读的一种方式。然而,自我选择可能不足以抵消负面的阅读经历,特别是当学生选择不符合他们阅读水平和兴趣的书籍时。两项实验测试了在选书时个性化的专家指导是否能防止阅读态度的下降。研究1关注的是职业前中等教育(7年级和8年级;n = 136)。研究2包括来自小学教育的年轻读者(4-6年级,N = 99)。实验条件下的学生在三个月内每两周与图书管理员会面讨论图书选择。在两项研究中,干预都稳定了阅读态度的下降,尽管在研究1中,干预只针对较高级的阅读者。在研究2中,最熟练的阅读者的阅读理解能力也有所提高。这表明,指导学生选书可以保持学生的阅读态度,促进阅读能力的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1